非对比CT单独与联合CT + CTA或MRA选择急性缺血性卒中取栓:天使行为登记分析

G. Ma, M. Mokin, B. Jia, Aparna Jadhav, X. Tong, D. Mo, N. Ma, F. Gao, X. Huo, G. Luo, L. Song, X. Sun, Y. Deng, A. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Gui, C. Song, Y. Peng, J. Wu, S. Zhao, J. Zhao, Z. Zhou, Z. Miao, Z. Ren
{"title":"非对比CT单独与联合CT + CTA或MRA选择急性缺血性卒中取栓:天使行为登记分析","authors":"G. Ma, M. Mokin, B. Jia, Aparna Jadhav, X. Tong, D. Mo, N. Ma, F. Gao, X. Huo, G. Luo, L. Song, X. Sun, Y. Deng, A. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Gui, C. Song, Y. Peng, J. Wu, S. Zhao, J. Zhao, Z. Zhou, Z. Miao, Z. Ren","doi":"10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-snis.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs) account for 25%-40% of all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases. With peri-procedural embolization occurring in up to 9% of all EVT cases, secondary MeVOs are of particular interest to neuroin-terventionalists. There is currently no reliable evidence regarding whether EVT is safe and effective for MeVO strokes. We sought to gain insight into the current management approaches regarding EVT in AIS caused by secondary MeVOs. Methods We conducted an international case-based survey (MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke; MeVO-FRON-TIERS) among stroke physicians to gain insight into the current management approaches regarding EVT in AIS caused by secondary MeVOs. Survey participants were presented three cases involving secondary MeVO, each consisting of three case-vignettes with differences in the neurological status of the described patient (improvement, no change, unable to assess due to general anaesthesia). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses clustered by respondent identity were performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat.","PeriodicalId":341680,"journal":{"name":"Oral poster abstracts","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P-001 Non-contrast CT alone versus combined CT plus CTA or MRA selection for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: analysis of the angel-act registry\",\"authors\":\"G. Ma, M. Mokin, B. Jia, Aparna Jadhav, X. Tong, D. Mo, N. Ma, F. Gao, X. Huo, G. Luo, L. Song, X. Sun, Y. Deng, A. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Gui, C. Song, Y. Peng, J. Wu, S. Zhao, J. Zhao, Z. Zhou, Z. Miao, Z. Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-snis.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs) account for 25%-40% of all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases. With peri-procedural embolization occurring in up to 9% of all EVT cases, secondary MeVOs are of particular interest to neuroin-terventionalists. There is currently no reliable evidence regarding whether EVT is safe and effective for MeVO strokes. We sought to gain insight into the current management approaches regarding EVT in AIS caused by secondary MeVOs. Methods We conducted an international case-based survey (MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke; MeVO-FRON-TIERS) among stroke physicians to gain insight into the current management approaches regarding EVT in AIS caused by secondary MeVOs. Survey participants were presented three cases involving secondary MeVO, each consisting of three case-vignettes with differences in the neurological status of the described patient (improvement, no change, unable to assess due to general anaesthesia). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses clustered by respondent identity were performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral poster abstracts\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral poster abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-snis.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral poster abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-snis.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中血管闭塞(MeVOs)占所有急性缺血性卒中(AIS)病例的25%-40%。在所有EVT病例中,术中栓塞发生率高达9%,继发性MeVOs是神经介入医生特别感兴趣的问题。目前还没有可靠的证据表明EVT对MeVO卒中是否安全有效。我们试图深入了解由继发性MeVOs引起的AIS中EVT的当前管理方法。方法:我们进行了一项基于国际病例的调查(mevo -寻找卒中介入血运重建术的依据和目标;MeVO-FRON-TIERS)的研究,以深入了解继发性mevo引起的AIS中EVT的当前管理方法。调查参与者被介绍了三个涉及继发性MeVO的病例,每个病例由三个病例小插曲组成,所描述的患者的神经状态存在差异(改善,无变化,由于全身麻醉无法评估)。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析被调查者身份聚类,以评估影响治疗决定的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
P-001 Non-contrast CT alone versus combined CT plus CTA or MRA selection for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: analysis of the angel-act registry
Background Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVOs) account for 25%-40% of all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) cases. With peri-procedural embolization occurring in up to 9% of all EVT cases, secondary MeVOs are of particular interest to neuroin-terventionalists. There is currently no reliable evidence regarding whether EVT is safe and effective for MeVO strokes. We sought to gain insight into the current management approaches regarding EVT in AIS caused by secondary MeVOs. Methods We conducted an international case-based survey (MeVO-Finding Rationales and Objectifying New Targets for IntervEntional Revascularization in Stroke; MeVO-FRON-TIERS) among stroke physicians to gain insight into the current management approaches regarding EVT in AIS caused by secondary MeVOs. Survey participants were presented three cases involving secondary MeVO, each consisting of three case-vignettes with differences in the neurological status of the described patient (improvement, no change, unable to assess due to general anaesthesia). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses clustered by respondent identity were performed to assess factors influencing the decision to treat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信