{"title":"伟大的朱利叶斯不是为了正义而流血吗?:在莎士比亚的《凯撒大帝》中,通过立遗嘱来考察社会正义理论","authors":"Lisa M. Barksdale-Shaw","doi":"10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article submits that, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s will functions as the pivotal, legal instrument that subscribesa path toward social justice for every Roman citizen by providing an economic legacy, and simultaneouslyovershadows the deadly allegations against Caesar, thereby highlighting his reputedly vile, tyrannical rule andexposing the calculating motives of Cassius and Brutus. The conveyance of land – as an act of empowering theRoman people – creates a strategic way toward leveraging economic power into their hands. I examine Caesar’swill, Roman inheritance, and Caesar’s legacy. I find similarities with the more recent South African legislationsurrounding land expropriation “in the public interest” with an effort “to tackle injustices”. The article alsoexamines how law negotiates as theatrical stage property, and as a legal instrument to gauge the rights of aneconomically undervalued class. Here, this analysis surveys justice, the law, and material culture, as a way tointerrogate this distinctive Roman history while considering written evidence, particularly its negotiation as afundamental, early modern legal vehicle","PeriodicalId":334648,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?”: Examining a theory of social justice through will-making in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M. Barksdale-Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article submits that, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s will functions as the pivotal, legal instrument that subscribesa path toward social justice for every Roman citizen by providing an economic legacy, and simultaneouslyovershadows the deadly allegations against Caesar, thereby highlighting his reputedly vile, tyrannical rule andexposing the calculating motives of Cassius and Brutus. The conveyance of land – as an act of empowering theRoman people – creates a strategic way toward leveraging economic power into their hands. I examine Caesar’swill, Roman inheritance, and Caesar’s legacy. I find similarities with the more recent South African legislationsurrounding land expropriation “in the public interest” with an effort “to tackle injustices”. The article alsoexamines how law negotiates as theatrical stage property, and as a legal instrument to gauge the rights of aneconomically undervalued class. Here, this analysis surveys justice, the law, and material culture, as a way tointerrogate this distinctive Roman history while considering written evidence, particularly its negotiation as afundamental, early modern legal vehicle\",\"PeriodicalId\":334648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shakespeare in Southern Africa\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shakespeare in Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?”: Examining a theory of social justice through will-making in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
This article submits that, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s will functions as the pivotal, legal instrument that subscribesa path toward social justice for every Roman citizen by providing an economic legacy, and simultaneouslyovershadows the deadly allegations against Caesar, thereby highlighting his reputedly vile, tyrannical rule andexposing the calculating motives of Cassius and Brutus. The conveyance of land – as an act of empowering theRoman people – creates a strategic way toward leveraging economic power into their hands. I examine Caesar’swill, Roman inheritance, and Caesar’s legacy. I find similarities with the more recent South African legislationsurrounding land expropriation “in the public interest” with an effort “to tackle injustices”. The article alsoexamines how law negotiates as theatrical stage property, and as a legal instrument to gauge the rights of aneconomically undervalued class. Here, this analysis surveys justice, the law, and material culture, as a way tointerrogate this distinctive Roman history while considering written evidence, particularly its negotiation as afundamental, early modern legal vehicle