伟大的朱利叶斯不是为了正义而流血吗?:在莎士比亚的《凯撒大帝》中,通过立遗嘱来考察社会正义理论

Lisa M. Barksdale-Shaw
{"title":"伟大的朱利叶斯不是为了正义而流血吗?:在莎士比亚的《凯撒大帝》中,通过立遗嘱来考察社会正义理论","authors":"Lisa M. Barksdale-Shaw","doi":"10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article submits that, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s will functions as the pivotal, legal instrument that subscribesa path toward social justice for every Roman citizen by providing an economic legacy, and simultaneouslyovershadows the deadly allegations against Caesar, thereby highlighting his reputedly vile, tyrannical rule andexposing the calculating motives of Cassius and Brutus. The conveyance of land – as an act of empowering theRoman people – creates a strategic way toward leveraging economic power into their hands. I examine Caesar’swill, Roman inheritance, and Caesar’s legacy. I find similarities with the more recent South African legislationsurrounding land expropriation “in the public interest” with an effort “to tackle injustices”. The article alsoexamines how law negotiates as theatrical stage property, and as a legal instrument to gauge the rights of aneconomically undervalued class. Here, this analysis surveys justice, the law, and material culture, as a way tointerrogate this distinctive Roman history while considering written evidence, particularly its negotiation as afundamental, early modern legal vehicle","PeriodicalId":334648,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?”: Examining a theory of social justice through will-making in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M. Barksdale-Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article submits that, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s will functions as the pivotal, legal instrument that subscribesa path toward social justice for every Roman citizen by providing an economic legacy, and simultaneouslyovershadows the deadly allegations against Caesar, thereby highlighting his reputedly vile, tyrannical rule andexposing the calculating motives of Cassius and Brutus. The conveyance of land – as an act of empowering theRoman people – creates a strategic way toward leveraging economic power into their hands. I examine Caesar’swill, Roman inheritance, and Caesar’s legacy. I find similarities with the more recent South African legislationsurrounding land expropriation “in the public interest” with an effort “to tackle injustices”. The article alsoexamines how law negotiates as theatrical stage property, and as a legal instrument to gauge the rights of aneconomically undervalued class. Here, this analysis surveys justice, the law, and material culture, as a way tointerrogate this distinctive Roman history while considering written evidence, particularly its negotiation as afundamental, early modern legal vehicle\",\"PeriodicalId\":334648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shakespeare in Southern Africa\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shakespeare in Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SISA.V33I1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,在《恺撒大帝》中,恺撒的遗嘱作为关键的法律工具,通过提供经济遗产,为每个罗马公民指明了通往社会正义的道路,同时掩盖了对恺撒的致命指控,从而突出了他众所周知的卑鄙、暴虐的统治,暴露了卡西乌斯和布鲁图斯的算计动机。土地的转让——作为赋予罗马人民权力的一种行为——创造了一种将经济权力转移到他们手中的战略方式。我检查了凯撒的遗嘱,罗马遗产和凯撒的遗产。我发现,最近南非围绕“为了公共利益”而征收土地的立法与“解决不公正问题”有相似之处。本文还考察了法律如何作为戏剧舞台财产进行谈判,以及作为衡量经济上被低估阶层权利的法律工具。在这里,这篇分析调查了正义、法律和物质文化,作为一种方式来审问这段独特的罗马历史,同时考虑到书面证据,特别是作为基本的、早期现代法律工具的谈判
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?”: Examining a theory of social justice through will-making in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar
This article submits that, in Julius Caesar, Caesar’s will functions as the pivotal, legal instrument that subscribesa path toward social justice for every Roman citizen by providing an economic legacy, and simultaneouslyovershadows the deadly allegations against Caesar, thereby highlighting his reputedly vile, tyrannical rule andexposing the calculating motives of Cassius and Brutus. The conveyance of land – as an act of empowering theRoman people – creates a strategic way toward leveraging economic power into their hands. I examine Caesar’swill, Roman inheritance, and Caesar’s legacy. I find similarities with the more recent South African legislationsurrounding land expropriation “in the public interest” with an effort “to tackle injustices”. The article alsoexamines how law negotiates as theatrical stage property, and as a legal instrument to gauge the rights of aneconomically undervalued class. Here, this analysis surveys justice, the law, and material culture, as a way tointerrogate this distinctive Roman history while considering written evidence, particularly its negotiation as afundamental, early modern legal vehicle
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信