V. Mhatre, S. Pilakkal, P. Chadha, Kaustav Talpatra
{"title":"调强放射治疗(IMRT)中a- si1200和a- si1000电子门脉成像仪剂量学比较","authors":"V. Mhatre, S. Pilakkal, P. Chadha, Kaustav Talpatra","doi":"10.4172/2155-9619.1000354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study investigates the dosimetric impact of a-Si 1200 over a-Si 1000 portal imager for 6 MV photon beam of a Varian Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device (a-Si EPID) installed on Edge and Novalis TxLinac. Materials and Methods: The performance of an a-Si EPID 1200 was assessed and compared to its performance with a-Si EPID 1000 and dose measurements using an ionization chamber. This study was conducted for 6MV photon energy and the EPID performance was assessed as function of the delivered dose, dose rate, field size, SDD effect, Ghosting effect, Backscatter arm shielding impact and intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields. Results: The dose response for a-Si 1200 was within 0.5% for low MU (2-10) as compared to 1.4% for a-Si 1000 portal imager and less than 1% for both the imager above 10 MU. The output factor variation for 25 × 25 cm2 was 1.3% for a-Si 1200 and 3.8% for a-Si 1000 when compared with ionisation chamber. The ghosting was measured to be 0.2% for a-Si 1200 as compared to 0.8% for a-Si 1000 portal imager. There is a significant improvement in a-Si 1200 portal image due to backscatter shielding material attached to the back of the panel of a-Si 1200 portal imager. Conclusion: The new aS1200 detector showed a significant dosimetric improvement when compared with previous aS1000 hence providing more accurate measurements for pre-treatment patient specific Quality Assurance (QA).","PeriodicalId":302578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric Comparison of a-Si 1200 and a-Si 1000 Electronic Portal Imager for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)\",\"authors\":\"V. Mhatre, S. Pilakkal, P. Chadha, Kaustav Talpatra\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9619.1000354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study investigates the dosimetric impact of a-Si 1200 over a-Si 1000 portal imager for 6 MV photon beam of a Varian Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device (a-Si EPID) installed on Edge and Novalis TxLinac. Materials and Methods: The performance of an a-Si EPID 1200 was assessed and compared to its performance with a-Si EPID 1000 and dose measurements using an ionization chamber. This study was conducted for 6MV photon energy and the EPID performance was assessed as function of the delivered dose, dose rate, field size, SDD effect, Ghosting effect, Backscatter arm shielding impact and intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields. Results: The dose response for a-Si 1200 was within 0.5% for low MU (2-10) as compared to 1.4% for a-Si 1000 portal imager and less than 1% for both the imager above 10 MU. The output factor variation for 25 × 25 cm2 was 1.3% for a-Si 1200 and 3.8% for a-Si 1000 when compared with ionisation chamber. The ghosting was measured to be 0.2% for a-Si 1200 as compared to 0.8% for a-Si 1000 portal imager. There is a significant improvement in a-Si 1200 portal image due to backscatter shielding material attached to the back of the panel of a-Si 1200 portal imager. Conclusion: The new aS1200 detector showed a significant dosimetric improvement when compared with previous aS1000 hence providing more accurate measurements for pre-treatment patient specific Quality Assurance (QA).\",\"PeriodicalId\":302578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9619.1000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的:研究安装在Edge和Novalis TxLinac上的瓦里安非晶硅电子传送门成像装置(a- si EPID)的6 MV光子束中,a- si 1200对a- si 1000传送门成像仪的剂量学影响。材料和方法:评估了a-Si epid1200的性能,并将其与a-Si epid1000的性能和使用电离室的剂量测量进行了比较。本研究以6MV光子能量为研究对象,通过传递剂量、剂量率、场大小、SDD效应、重影效应、后向散射臂屏蔽冲击和调强放疗场的函数来评估EPID的性能。结果:低MU(2-10)时,a-Si 1200的剂量反应在0.5%以内,而a-Si 1000门静脉成像仪的剂量反应为1.4%,10 MU以上的剂量反应均小于1%。与电离室相比,25 × 25 cm2的a-Si 1200输出因子变化为1.3%,a-Si 1000输出因子变化为3.8%。经测量,a-Si 1200的重影率为0.2%,而a-Si 1000的重影率为0.8%。由于在a- si 1200传送门成像仪面板背面附加了后向散射屏蔽材料,使得a- si 1200传送门成像有了明显的改善。结论:与以前的aS1000相比,新的aS1200检测仪显示出显著的剂量学改进,因此为治疗前患者特异性质量保证(QA)提供了更准确的测量。
Dosimetric Comparison of a-Si 1200 and a-Si 1000 Electronic Portal Imager for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)
Aim: This study investigates the dosimetric impact of a-Si 1200 over a-Si 1000 portal imager for 6 MV photon beam of a Varian Amorphous Silicon Electronic Portal Imaging Device (a-Si EPID) installed on Edge and Novalis TxLinac. Materials and Methods: The performance of an a-Si EPID 1200 was assessed and compared to its performance with a-Si EPID 1000 and dose measurements using an ionization chamber. This study was conducted for 6MV photon energy and the EPID performance was assessed as function of the delivered dose, dose rate, field size, SDD effect, Ghosting effect, Backscatter arm shielding impact and intensity-modulated radiation therapy fields. Results: The dose response for a-Si 1200 was within 0.5% for low MU (2-10) as compared to 1.4% for a-Si 1000 portal imager and less than 1% for both the imager above 10 MU. The output factor variation for 25 × 25 cm2 was 1.3% for a-Si 1200 and 3.8% for a-Si 1000 when compared with ionisation chamber. The ghosting was measured to be 0.2% for a-Si 1200 as compared to 0.8% for a-Si 1000 portal imager. There is a significant improvement in a-Si 1200 portal image due to backscatter shielding material attached to the back of the panel of a-Si 1200 portal imager. Conclusion: The new aS1200 detector showed a significant dosimetric improvement when compared with previous aS1000 hence providing more accurate measurements for pre-treatment patient specific Quality Assurance (QA).