{"title":"超越斯堪的纳维亚:华盛顿对市场腐败的共识","authors":"A. Offer, Gabriel Söderberg","doi":"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reveals that Scandinavia was but a sideshow in a larger plot in which market-liberal advocates strove to capture the command of policy worldwide with the ‘Washington Consensus’. Their doctrines are viewed here from three aspects: internal validity, empirical performance, and unintended consequences. In brief, these doctrines were inconsistent, failed repeatedly, and engulfed the public domain in a miasma of corruption, in developed countries as well as ‘emerging’ ones. The reason, the chapter argues, is that these doctrines were founded on deficient models of reality. The Nobel Prize played a part in all of this, if only a minor one.","PeriodicalId":189824,"journal":{"name":"The Nobel Factor","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Scandinavia: Washington Consensus to Market Corruption\",\"authors\":\"A. Offer, Gabriel Söderberg\",\"doi\":\"10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reveals that Scandinavia was but a sideshow in a larger plot in which market-liberal advocates strove to capture the command of policy worldwide with the ‘Washington Consensus’. Their doctrines are viewed here from three aspects: internal validity, empirical performance, and unintended consequences. In brief, these doctrines were inconsistent, failed repeatedly, and engulfed the public domain in a miasma of corruption, in developed countries as well as ‘emerging’ ones. The reason, the chapter argues, is that these doctrines were founded on deficient models of reality. The Nobel Prize played a part in all of this, if only a minor one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Nobel Factor\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Nobel Factor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nobel Factor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691196312.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond Scandinavia: Washington Consensus to Market Corruption
This chapter reveals that Scandinavia was but a sideshow in a larger plot in which market-liberal advocates strove to capture the command of policy worldwide with the ‘Washington Consensus’. Their doctrines are viewed here from three aspects: internal validity, empirical performance, and unintended consequences. In brief, these doctrines were inconsistent, failed repeatedly, and engulfed the public domain in a miasma of corruption, in developed countries as well as ‘emerging’ ones. The reason, the chapter argues, is that these doctrines were founded on deficient models of reality. The Nobel Prize played a part in all of this, if only a minor one.