医学生临床前与临床年问题型学习的学习效果

Sarawut Suksuphew, Raksina Chainarongsiriporn, Tiraporn Phumwiriya
{"title":"医学生临床前与临床年问题型学习的学习效果","authors":"Sarawut Suksuphew, Raksina Chainarongsiriporn, Tiraporn Phumwiriya","doi":"10.4172/2469-9837.1000215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare learning outcomes of problem-based learning (PBL) between pre-clinical and clinical years of medical students. \n \nMethods: The questionnaires were sent to medical students who enrolled during academic year 2012-2015 and they were asked their personal opinion on learning outcomes from PBL by using Likert scale (0-5). The returned questionnaires were divided into pre-clinical (2nd-3rd) and clinical (4th-5th) year groups. The difference of opinion rates between both groups were compared by using the independent t Test. \n \nResults: The response rate of the questionnaire was 98%. The most of medical students learned by PBL more than 10 times a year. The opinion rates about learning capacity, skills, communications, teamwork and self-assessment were in much agree level (4.34-4.75). The process of applying to reality situation, knowledge management and self-knowledge management were different with statistical significance between both groups (p<0.05). Both groups agree that PBL is a collaborative process (p=0.97). In the pre-clinical students, PBL has made them more applicable to classroom learning. While clinical students found that PBL enabled them to be applied outside the classroom, more specifically, the application of real patient problems improved. \n \nConclusion: Although the skills learned from the PBL were different between pre-clinical and clinical year groups. Group work is still an important factor in successful PBL. When the facilitators understand the specific objectives of mutual learning in PBL, it will encourage medical students to learn effectively.","PeriodicalId":439866,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Outcomes of Problem-Based Learning between Pre-clinical and Clinical Years of Medical Students\",\"authors\":\"Sarawut Suksuphew, Raksina Chainarongsiriporn, Tiraporn Phumwiriya\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2469-9837.1000215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To compare learning outcomes of problem-based learning (PBL) between pre-clinical and clinical years of medical students. \\n \\nMethods: The questionnaires were sent to medical students who enrolled during academic year 2012-2015 and they were asked their personal opinion on learning outcomes from PBL by using Likert scale (0-5). The returned questionnaires were divided into pre-clinical (2nd-3rd) and clinical (4th-5th) year groups. The difference of opinion rates between both groups were compared by using the independent t Test. \\n \\nResults: The response rate of the questionnaire was 98%. The most of medical students learned by PBL more than 10 times a year. The opinion rates about learning capacity, skills, communications, teamwork and self-assessment were in much agree level (4.34-4.75). The process of applying to reality situation, knowledge management and self-knowledge management were different with statistical significance between both groups (p<0.05). Both groups agree that PBL is a collaborative process (p=0.97). In the pre-clinical students, PBL has made them more applicable to classroom learning. While clinical students found that PBL enabled them to be applied outside the classroom, more specifically, the application of real patient problems improved. \\n \\nConclusion: Although the skills learned from the PBL were different between pre-clinical and clinical year groups. Group work is still an important factor in successful PBL. When the facilitators understand the specific objectives of mutual learning in PBL, it will encourage medical students to learn effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-9837.1000215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-9837.1000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较医学生临床前与临床阶段问题型学习(PBL)学习效果。方法:采用李克特量表(0-5)对2012-2015学年入学的医学生进行问卷调查,了解他们对PBL学习效果的个人看法。将返回的问卷分为临床前(2 -3年)组和临床(4 -5年)组。采用独立t检验比较两组意见率的差异。结果:问卷回复率为98%。大多数医学生每年通过PBL学习10次以上。学生对学习能力、技能、沟通能力、团队合作能力和自我评价的意见评分均在4.34-4.75之间。应用于实际情况的过程、知识管理和自我知识管理两组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。两组都认为PBL是一个协作过程(p=0.97)。在临床前学生中,PBL使他们更适合课堂学习。虽然临床学生发现PBL使他们能够在课堂外应用,更具体地说,对实际患者问题的应用得到了改善。结论:临床前组和临床年组在PBL学习技能方面存在差异。小组工作仍然是PBL成功的一个重要因素。当辅导员理解PBL中相互学习的具体目标时,它将鼓励医学生有效地学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Outcomes of Problem-Based Learning between Pre-clinical and Clinical Years of Medical Students
Objectives: To compare learning outcomes of problem-based learning (PBL) between pre-clinical and clinical years of medical students. Methods: The questionnaires were sent to medical students who enrolled during academic year 2012-2015 and they were asked their personal opinion on learning outcomes from PBL by using Likert scale (0-5). The returned questionnaires were divided into pre-clinical (2nd-3rd) and clinical (4th-5th) year groups. The difference of opinion rates between both groups were compared by using the independent t Test. Results: The response rate of the questionnaire was 98%. The most of medical students learned by PBL more than 10 times a year. The opinion rates about learning capacity, skills, communications, teamwork and self-assessment were in much agree level (4.34-4.75). The process of applying to reality situation, knowledge management and self-knowledge management were different with statistical significance between both groups (p<0.05). Both groups agree that PBL is a collaborative process (p=0.97). In the pre-clinical students, PBL has made them more applicable to classroom learning. While clinical students found that PBL enabled them to be applied outside the classroom, more specifically, the application of real patient problems improved. Conclusion: Although the skills learned from the PBL were different between pre-clinical and clinical year groups. Group work is still an important factor in successful PBL. When the facilitators understand the specific objectives of mutual learning in PBL, it will encourage medical students to learn effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信