意大利急诊科分诊护士对院前急救人员的看法:对临床交接的潜在威胁。

Francesco Dojmi Di Delupis, Niccolò Mancini, M. Ruggeri, P. Pisanelli
{"title":"意大利急诊科分诊护士对院前急救人员的看法:对临床交接的潜在威胁。","authors":"Francesco Dojmi Di Delupis, Niccolò Mancini, M. Ruggeri, P. Pisanelli","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nIn Italy, volunteer rescuers respond to most prehospital emergency calls. These rescuers provide the majority of patient information during handover at the emergency department triage. Standardized terminology between rescuers and triage nurses is lacking in Italy, and miscommunication may cause a poor handover. Even though rescuers are professional health providers, their qualification is not legally recognized, and triage nurses have a pervasive sense of inadequacy about the rescuers' competences.This work explored triage nurses' perceptions of rescuers and the causes of these perceptions to verify whether difficult interprofessional relationships negatively influence the clinical handover process.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe performed a survey among 402 triage nurses for 3 main areas of rescuers' competency: communication, knowledge, and decision making. For each area, we identified communications, decision making, and knowledge indicators. A scale score of 6 or higher was considered not sufficient.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe found that 75.5% (n = 302/400) of triage nurses regard rescuers' ability to recognize life-threatening situations as not sufficient (communication ability indicator). Approximately 66% (n = 264/401) of triage nurses regard rescuers' ability to administer oxygen as not sufficient (decision-making indicator), and approximately 58% (n = 232/402) of nurses regard rescuers' ability to report the reason for the emergency call as not sufficient (knowledge indicator).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results of this survey show that the overall perception of triage nurses about prehospital rescuers is slightly below sufficiency. This perception could cause errors during the prehospital or hospital handover at the triage and could lead to delayed decisions and incorrect treatment.","PeriodicalId":206245,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Emergency Department Triage Nurses About Prehospital Emergency Rescuers in Italy: A Latent Threat to Clinical Handover.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Dojmi Di Delupis, Niccolò Mancini, M. Ruggeri, P. Pisanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nIn Italy, volunteer rescuers respond to most prehospital emergency calls. These rescuers provide the majority of patient information during handover at the emergency department triage. Standardized terminology between rescuers and triage nurses is lacking in Italy, and miscommunication may cause a poor handover. Even though rescuers are professional health providers, their qualification is not legally recognized, and triage nurses have a pervasive sense of inadequacy about the rescuers' competences.This work explored triage nurses' perceptions of rescuers and the causes of these perceptions to verify whether difficult interprofessional relationships negatively influence the clinical handover process.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nWe performed a survey among 402 triage nurses for 3 main areas of rescuers' competency: communication, knowledge, and decision making. For each area, we identified communications, decision making, and knowledge indicators. A scale score of 6 or higher was considered not sufficient.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe found that 75.5% (n = 302/400) of triage nurses regard rescuers' ability to recognize life-threatening situations as not sufficient (communication ability indicator). Approximately 66% (n = 264/401) of triage nurses regard rescuers' ability to administer oxygen as not sufficient (decision-making indicator), and approximately 58% (n = 232/402) of nurses regard rescuers' ability to report the reason for the emergency call as not sufficient (knowledge indicator).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe results of this survey show that the overall perception of triage nurses about prehospital rescuers is slightly below sufficiency. This perception could cause errors during the prehospital or hospital handover at the triage and could lead to delayed decisions and incorrect treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的在意大利,志愿救援人员响应大多数院前紧急呼叫。在急诊科分诊交接时,这些救援人员提供了大部分患者信息。在意大利,救援人员和分诊护士之间缺乏标准化的术语,沟通不畅可能会导致交接不顺利。尽管救援人员是专业的医疗服务提供者,但他们的资格没有得到法律承认,而且分诊护士对救援人员的能力普遍感到不足。这项工作探讨了分诊护士对救援人员的看法和这些看法的原因,以验证困难的跨专业关系是否对临床交接过程产生负面影响。方法对402名分诊护士进行沟通能力、知识能力和决策能力3个主要方面的调查。对于每个领域,我们确定了沟通、决策和知识指标。量表得分为6分或更高被认为是不够的。结果75.5% (n = 302/400)的分诊护士认为救援人员对危重情况的识别能力不足(沟通能力指标)。约66% (n = 264/401)的分诊护士认为救援人员给氧能力不足(决策指标),约58% (n = 232/402)的护士认为救援人员报告紧急呼叫原因的能力不足(知识指标)。结论本调查结果显示,分诊护士对院前急救人员的整体认知略低于充分。这种认知可能会导致院前或医院分诊交接时出现错误,并可能导致决策延迟和治疗错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Emergency Department Triage Nurses About Prehospital Emergency Rescuers in Italy: A Latent Threat to Clinical Handover.
OBJECTIVES In Italy, volunteer rescuers respond to most prehospital emergency calls. These rescuers provide the majority of patient information during handover at the emergency department triage. Standardized terminology between rescuers and triage nurses is lacking in Italy, and miscommunication may cause a poor handover. Even though rescuers are professional health providers, their qualification is not legally recognized, and triage nurses have a pervasive sense of inadequacy about the rescuers' competences.This work explored triage nurses' perceptions of rescuers and the causes of these perceptions to verify whether difficult interprofessional relationships negatively influence the clinical handover process. METHODS We performed a survey among 402 triage nurses for 3 main areas of rescuers' competency: communication, knowledge, and decision making. For each area, we identified communications, decision making, and knowledge indicators. A scale score of 6 or higher was considered not sufficient. RESULTS We found that 75.5% (n = 302/400) of triage nurses regard rescuers' ability to recognize life-threatening situations as not sufficient (communication ability indicator). Approximately 66% (n = 264/401) of triage nurses regard rescuers' ability to administer oxygen as not sufficient (decision-making indicator), and approximately 58% (n = 232/402) of nurses regard rescuers' ability to report the reason for the emergency call as not sufficient (knowledge indicator). CONCLUSIONS The results of this survey show that the overall perception of triage nurses about prehospital rescuers is slightly below sufficiency. This perception could cause errors during the prehospital or hospital handover at the triage and could lead to delayed decisions and incorrect treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信