进步的公司刑法缺失的解释

W. Laufer
{"title":"进步的公司刑法缺失的解释","authors":"W. Laufer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3034705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article offers a modern progressive account of corporate criminal law using foundational principles of twentieth century progressivism. The central role of science and advancing technology define the architecture of this account. Some of the intractable challenges of using the criminal law to regulate corporations are reviewed, followed by a recognition of a remarkable convergence of corporate compliance standards, measures, practices, and insights from conventional, plural, and polycentric theories of regulation. This is a convergence of informal corporate social controls offering a potentially powerful opportunity for the promotion of modern progressive interests, practices, and advocacy. Next, the two pillars of twentieth century progressivism, the instrumental use of science and social control, are discussed. A “compliance conundrum,” it is argued, undermines corporate commitments to compliance science, technology, and more effective social controls. This conundrum contributes to a compliance game where corporate and regulatory players placate each other with an outcome that often has little to do with greater law abidance. With a glimmer hope, this Article concludes by considering the unique position of progressives to disrupt the compliance game while promoting corporate criminal justice.","PeriodicalId":171263,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Missing Account of Progressive Corporate Criminal Law\",\"authors\":\"W. Laufer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3034705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article offers a modern progressive account of corporate criminal law using foundational principles of twentieth century progressivism. The central role of science and advancing technology define the architecture of this account. Some of the intractable challenges of using the criminal law to regulate corporations are reviewed, followed by a recognition of a remarkable convergence of corporate compliance standards, measures, practices, and insights from conventional, plural, and polycentric theories of regulation. This is a convergence of informal corporate social controls offering a potentially powerful opportunity for the promotion of modern progressive interests, practices, and advocacy. Next, the two pillars of twentieth century progressivism, the instrumental use of science and social control, are discussed. A “compliance conundrum,” it is argued, undermines corporate commitments to compliance science, technology, and more effective social controls. This conundrum contributes to a compliance game where corporate and regulatory players placate each other with an outcome that often has little to do with greater law abidance. With a glimmer hope, this Article concludes by considering the unique position of progressives to disrupt the compliance game while promoting corporate criminal justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3034705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3034705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文运用二十世纪进步主义的基本原则,对公司刑法进行了现代进步解释。科学和先进技术的核心作用定义了这个账户的架构。本文回顾了利用刑法监管公司的一些棘手挑战,随后认识到公司合规标准、措施、实践和来自传统、多元和多中心监管理论的见解的显著融合。这是一种非正式企业社会控制的融合,为促进现代进步的利益、实践和倡导提供了潜在的强大机会。接下来,我们将讨论二十世纪进步主义的两大支柱,即科学的工具性应用和社会控制。有人认为,“合规难题”破坏了企业对合规科学、技术和更有效的社会控制的承诺。这一难题导致了一场合规游戏,企业和监管机构的参与者相互安抚,结果往往与更严格的遵纪守法没有多大关系。带着一丝希望,本文最后考虑了进步主义者在促进公司刑事司法的同时打破合规游戏的独特地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Missing Account of Progressive Corporate Criminal Law
This Article offers a modern progressive account of corporate criminal law using foundational principles of twentieth century progressivism. The central role of science and advancing technology define the architecture of this account. Some of the intractable challenges of using the criminal law to regulate corporations are reviewed, followed by a recognition of a remarkable convergence of corporate compliance standards, measures, practices, and insights from conventional, plural, and polycentric theories of regulation. This is a convergence of informal corporate social controls offering a potentially powerful opportunity for the promotion of modern progressive interests, practices, and advocacy. Next, the two pillars of twentieth century progressivism, the instrumental use of science and social control, are discussed. A “compliance conundrum,” it is argued, undermines corporate commitments to compliance science, technology, and more effective social controls. This conundrum contributes to a compliance game where corporate and regulatory players placate each other with an outcome that often has little to do with greater law abidance. With a glimmer hope, this Article concludes by considering the unique position of progressives to disrupt the compliance game while promoting corporate criminal justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信