商品收益的横截面:一个非参数方法

C. Struck, Enoch Cheng
{"title":"商品收益的横截面:一个非参数方法","authors":"C. Struck, Enoch Cheng","doi":"10.3905/jfds.2020.1.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To what extent are financial market returns predictable? Standard approaches to asset pricing make strong parametric assumptions that undermine their return-predicting ability. The authors employ tree-based methods to overcome these limitations and attempt to approximate an upper bound for the predictability of returns in commodities futures markets. Out of sample, they find that up to 3.74% of 1-month returns are predictable—more than a 10-fold increase from standard approaches. The findings hint at the importance multiway interactions and nonlinearities acquire in the data; they imply that new factors should be tested on their ability to add explanatory power to an ensemble of existing factors. TOPICS: Futures and forward contracts, commodities Key Findings • Standard approaches to asset pricing make strong parametric assumptions that undermine their return-predicting ability. • The authors employ tree-based methods to overcome these limitations and estimate the predictability of returns in commodities futures markets. • Out of sample, they find that up to 3.74% of 1-month returns are predictable—more than a 10-fold increase from standard approaches.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cross Section of Commodity Returns: A Nonparametric Approach\",\"authors\":\"C. Struck, Enoch Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfds.2020.1.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To what extent are financial market returns predictable? Standard approaches to asset pricing make strong parametric assumptions that undermine their return-predicting ability. The authors employ tree-based methods to overcome these limitations and attempt to approximate an upper bound for the predictability of returns in commodities futures markets. Out of sample, they find that up to 3.74% of 1-month returns are predictable—more than a 10-fold increase from standard approaches. The findings hint at the importance multiway interactions and nonlinearities acquire in the data; they imply that new factors should be tested on their ability to add explanatory power to an ensemble of existing factors. TOPICS: Futures and forward contracts, commodities Key Findings • Standard approaches to asset pricing make strong parametric assumptions that undermine their return-predicting ability. • The authors employ tree-based methods to overcome these limitations and estimate the predictability of returns in commodities futures markets. • Out of sample, they find that up to 3.74% of 1-month returns are predictable—more than a 10-fold increase from standard approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2020.1.034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2020.1.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

金融市场回报在多大程度上是可预测的?资产定价的标准方法做出了强有力的参数假设,这削弱了它们预测收益的能力。作者采用基于树的方法来克服这些限制,并试图近似商品期货市场回报可预测性的上限。在样本之外,他们发现高达3.74%的1个月回报是可预测的——比标准方法增加了10倍以上。这些发现暗示了数据中多重相互作用和非线性的重要性;他们暗示,应该测试新因素是否有能力为现有因素的集合增加解释力。主题:期货和远期合约,大宗商品主要发现•资产定价的标准方法做出了强有力的参数假设,破坏了它们的回报预测能力。•作者采用基于树的方法来克服这些限制,并估计商品期货市场回报的可预测性。•在样本之外,他们发现高达3.74%的1个月回报是可预测的,比标准方法增加了10倍以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cross Section of Commodity Returns: A Nonparametric Approach
To what extent are financial market returns predictable? Standard approaches to asset pricing make strong parametric assumptions that undermine their return-predicting ability. The authors employ tree-based methods to overcome these limitations and attempt to approximate an upper bound for the predictability of returns in commodities futures markets. Out of sample, they find that up to 3.74% of 1-month returns are predictable—more than a 10-fold increase from standard approaches. The findings hint at the importance multiway interactions and nonlinearities acquire in the data; they imply that new factors should be tested on their ability to add explanatory power to an ensemble of existing factors. TOPICS: Futures and forward contracts, commodities Key Findings • Standard approaches to asset pricing make strong parametric assumptions that undermine their return-predicting ability. • The authors employ tree-based methods to overcome these limitations and estimate the predictability of returns in commodities futures markets. • Out of sample, they find that up to 3.74% of 1-month returns are predictable—more than a 10-fold increase from standard approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信