曾特纳谈卡茨(还有泽德勒和希斯)

J. Zentner
{"title":"曾特纳谈卡茨(还有泽德勒和希斯)","authors":"J. Zentner","doi":"10.3368/er.10.2.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restoration, as an attempt to replicate natural landscapes or ecosystems, provokes deeply held feelings about the separation of humanity and nature which have been a part of Western culture for centuries. The environmental movement, from which the field of restoration is at least partly derived, generally postulates a clear separation between humanity’s works (although not necessarily humanity) and nature. Restoration challenges this separation, and we will continue to question both the restorationist’s ability to replicate natural landscapes and the degree to which purely human objectives should influence restoration efforts until an ethical framework is developed within the restoration movement to resolve this challenge. Two recent publications, \"The ethical significance of human intervention in nature\" by Eric Katz (R&MN 9:2, pp. 90-96) and The Experience of Place by Tony Hiss (Harper & Row, 240 pp.) approach the relationship between nature and humanity and its implications for restoration quite differently. Here I will review both publications in the hope of contributing to the development of an ethical framework for the field of restoration.","PeriodicalId":105419,"journal":{"name":"Restoration & Management Notes","volume":"30 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zentner on Katz (and Zedler, and Hiss)\",\"authors\":\"J. Zentner\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/er.10.2.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Restoration, as an attempt to replicate natural landscapes or ecosystems, provokes deeply held feelings about the separation of humanity and nature which have been a part of Western culture for centuries. The environmental movement, from which the field of restoration is at least partly derived, generally postulates a clear separation between humanity’s works (although not necessarily humanity) and nature. Restoration challenges this separation, and we will continue to question both the restorationist’s ability to replicate natural landscapes and the degree to which purely human objectives should influence restoration efforts until an ethical framework is developed within the restoration movement to resolve this challenge. Two recent publications, \\\"The ethical significance of human intervention in nature\\\" by Eric Katz (R&MN 9:2, pp. 90-96) and The Experience of Place by Tony Hiss (Harper & Row, 240 pp.) approach the relationship between nature and humanity and its implications for restoration quite differently. Here I will review both publications in the hope of contributing to the development of an ethical framework for the field of restoration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"volume\":\"30 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restoration & Management Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.10.2.113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration & Management Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.10.2.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作为复制自然景观或生态系统的一种尝试,修复激起了人们对人类与自然分离的深刻感受,这种分离已经成为西方文化几个世纪的一部分。恢复领域至少部分来源于环境运动,它通常假定人类的工作(尽管不一定是人类)与自然之间有明确的分离。修复挑战了这种分离,我们将继续质疑修复主义者复制自然景观的能力,以及纯粹的人类目标应该在多大程度上影响修复工作,直到在修复运动中形成一个道德框架来解决这一挑战。最近出版的两本出版物,埃里克·卡茨的《人类干预自然的伦理意义》(R&MN 9:2, 90-96页)和托尼·希斯的《地方的体验》(Harper & Row出版社,240页),对自然与人类的关系及其对恢复的影响有着截然不同的看法。在这里,我将回顾这两份出版物,希望对修复领域的伦理框架的发展有所贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zentner on Katz (and Zedler, and Hiss)
Restoration, as an attempt to replicate natural landscapes or ecosystems, provokes deeply held feelings about the separation of humanity and nature which have been a part of Western culture for centuries. The environmental movement, from which the field of restoration is at least partly derived, generally postulates a clear separation between humanity’s works (although not necessarily humanity) and nature. Restoration challenges this separation, and we will continue to question both the restorationist’s ability to replicate natural landscapes and the degree to which purely human objectives should influence restoration efforts until an ethical framework is developed within the restoration movement to resolve this challenge. Two recent publications, "The ethical significance of human intervention in nature" by Eric Katz (R&MN 9:2, pp. 90-96) and The Experience of Place by Tony Hiss (Harper & Row, 240 pp.) approach the relationship between nature and humanity and its implications for restoration quite differently. Here I will review both publications in the hope of contributing to the development of an ethical framework for the field of restoration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信