刀具速度下管道金属损失缺陷的建模

Matthew Romney, Adrian Belanger
{"title":"刀具速度下管道金属损失缺陷的建模","authors":"Matthew Romney, Adrian Belanger","doi":"10.1115/IPC2018-78014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate defect sizing is crucial for maintaining effective pipeline safety and operation. Under growing pressure from local, national and world organizations, pipeline operators demand improved magnetic flux leakage (MFL) metal-loss sizing accuracy and classification from in-line inspection (ILI) tools.\n The axial MFL field response in pipeline steel near a metal-loss defect is a very complex phenomenon. Although critical for proper sizing model development, the effects of tool speed due to product flow is very difficult to model during finite element analysis (FEA) and therefore is often overlooked. However, understanding the dynamic MFL response is crucial for proper ILI tool design and the development of accurate defect sizing algorithms.\n T.D. Williamson (TDW) utilizes dynamic computer simulation modeling, paired with laboratory testing, to develop the complex parametric relationships between metal loss geometry, pipeline material and ILI tool speed. The blend of simulation and physical test results allow for TDW to iterate more quickly across multiple physics variables with simulation models, while maintaining a firm footing in reality with physical test validation. Accurately simulating magnetic field responses of metal loss under dynamic conditions produces the data necessary to identify optimal magnetizer design, including optimizing sensor spacing and placement for metal-loss defect sizing and characterization.\n This paper will provide an overview of advances in the use of computer simulation modeling for predicting dynamic flux leakage field response. Besides increasing accuracy, results from this work will extend specifications beyond optimal speed ranges and provide the basis for general corrosion profilometry predictions from decomposition of the full MFL signal.","PeriodicalId":273758,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Pipeline Metal Loss Defects at Tool Speed\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Romney, Adrian Belanger\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/IPC2018-78014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate defect sizing is crucial for maintaining effective pipeline safety and operation. Under growing pressure from local, national and world organizations, pipeline operators demand improved magnetic flux leakage (MFL) metal-loss sizing accuracy and classification from in-line inspection (ILI) tools.\\n The axial MFL field response in pipeline steel near a metal-loss defect is a very complex phenomenon. Although critical for proper sizing model development, the effects of tool speed due to product flow is very difficult to model during finite element analysis (FEA) and therefore is often overlooked. However, understanding the dynamic MFL response is crucial for proper ILI tool design and the development of accurate defect sizing algorithms.\\n T.D. Williamson (TDW) utilizes dynamic computer simulation modeling, paired with laboratory testing, to develop the complex parametric relationships between metal loss geometry, pipeline material and ILI tool speed. The blend of simulation and physical test results allow for TDW to iterate more quickly across multiple physics variables with simulation models, while maintaining a firm footing in reality with physical test validation. Accurately simulating magnetic field responses of metal loss under dynamic conditions produces the data necessary to identify optimal magnetizer design, including optimizing sensor spacing and placement for metal-loss defect sizing and characterization.\\n This paper will provide an overview of advances in the use of computer simulation modeling for predicting dynamic flux leakage field response. Besides increasing accuracy, results from this work will extend specifications beyond optimal speed ranges and provide the basis for general corrosion profilometry predictions from decomposition of the full MFL signal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的缺陷尺寸是保证管道安全有效运行的关键。在地方、国家和世界组织日益增长的压力下,管道运营商要求在线检测(ILI)工具提高漏磁(MFL)金属损失尺寸的准确性和分类。管线钢在金属损耗缺陷附近的轴向磁场响应是一个非常复杂的现象。虽然对适当的尺寸模型的开发至关重要,但由于产品流动引起的刀具速度的影响在有限元分析(FEA)中很难建模,因此经常被忽视。然而,了解动态MFL响应对于正确设计ILI工具和开发准确的缺陷尺寸算法至关重要。T.D. Williamson (TDW)利用动态计算机模拟建模,结合实验室测试,开发了金属损失几何形状、管道材料和ILI工具速度之间的复杂参数关系。模拟和物理测试结果的混合允许TDW使用模拟模型在多个物理变量之间更快地迭代,同时在物理测试验证中保持坚实的基础。准确模拟动态条件下金属损耗的磁场响应,可以产生确定最佳磁化器设计所需的数据,包括优化传感器间距和放置,以确定金属损耗缺陷的尺寸和表征。本文将概述利用计算机模拟模型预测动态漏磁场响应的进展。除了提高精度外,这项工作的结果将超出最佳速度范围,并为根据全MFL信号的分解进行一般腐蚀剖面预测提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling Pipeline Metal Loss Defects at Tool Speed
Accurate defect sizing is crucial for maintaining effective pipeline safety and operation. Under growing pressure from local, national and world organizations, pipeline operators demand improved magnetic flux leakage (MFL) metal-loss sizing accuracy and classification from in-line inspection (ILI) tools. The axial MFL field response in pipeline steel near a metal-loss defect is a very complex phenomenon. Although critical for proper sizing model development, the effects of tool speed due to product flow is very difficult to model during finite element analysis (FEA) and therefore is often overlooked. However, understanding the dynamic MFL response is crucial for proper ILI tool design and the development of accurate defect sizing algorithms. T.D. Williamson (TDW) utilizes dynamic computer simulation modeling, paired with laboratory testing, to develop the complex parametric relationships between metal loss geometry, pipeline material and ILI tool speed. The blend of simulation and physical test results allow for TDW to iterate more quickly across multiple physics variables with simulation models, while maintaining a firm footing in reality with physical test validation. Accurately simulating magnetic field responses of metal loss under dynamic conditions produces the data necessary to identify optimal magnetizer design, including optimizing sensor spacing and placement for metal-loss defect sizing and characterization. This paper will provide an overview of advances in the use of computer simulation modeling for predicting dynamic flux leakage field response. Besides increasing accuracy, results from this work will extend specifications beyond optimal speed ranges and provide the basis for general corrosion profilometry predictions from decomposition of the full MFL signal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信