240V或以下、2000A以上系统电弧闪光可持续性的详细方法

Kyle D. Carr, Zarheer Jooma, John J. Whipple
{"title":"240V或以下、2000A以上系统电弧闪光可持续性的详细方法","authors":"Kyle D. Carr, Zarheer Jooma, John J. Whipple","doi":"10.1109/ESW49146.2022.9925030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The IEEE Std. 1584–2018 IEEE Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations has seen a welcome improvement in calculation accuracy from the 2002 version. Empirical data used for the 2018 standard shows that below 250VAC certain arcs sustained while other arcs failed to sustain. The “<240V and <125kVA transformer” exception in the 2002 standard has been replaced by “≤240V (nominal) and <2000A (short-circuit current)” language, that includes a band of arcs that did not sustain during practical testing. Previously published papers suggested further research into this area, however, within the finite resources available to the 1584–2018 working committee, not all requests could materialize. This paper investigates whether guidelines for arc sustainability (<250VAC equipment) match the empirical arc testing data available from IEEE, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), and others while considering new developments and a better understating of arc physics. It uses recent data from studies performed at utilities and industry to determine the impact (if any) of a range of conservatism in the standard. This paper concludes by presenting a more detailed approach using NFPA 70E® - 2021 for users who may be affected by conservative results and suggests areas where additional testing and research may benefit end-users.","PeriodicalId":325388,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Detailed Approach for ARC Flash Sustainability for Systems at or Below 240V and Over 2000A\",\"authors\":\"Kyle D. Carr, Zarheer Jooma, John J. Whipple\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESW49146.2022.9925030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The IEEE Std. 1584–2018 IEEE Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations has seen a welcome improvement in calculation accuracy from the 2002 version. Empirical data used for the 2018 standard shows that below 250VAC certain arcs sustained while other arcs failed to sustain. The “<240V and <125kVA transformer” exception in the 2002 standard has been replaced by “≤240V (nominal) and <2000A (short-circuit current)” language, that includes a band of arcs that did not sustain during practical testing. Previously published papers suggested further research into this area, however, within the finite resources available to the 1584–2018 working committee, not all requests could materialize. This paper investigates whether guidelines for arc sustainability (<250VAC equipment) match the empirical arc testing data available from IEEE, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), and others while considering new developments and a better understating of arc physics. It uses recent data from studies performed at utilities and industry to determine the impact (if any) of a range of conservatism in the standard. This paper concludes by presenting a more detailed approach using NFPA 70E® - 2021 for users who may be affected by conservative results and suggests areas where additional testing and research may benefit end-users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW49146.2022.9925030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW49146.2022.9925030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与2002年版本相比,IEEE Std. 1584-2018《IEEE电弧闪光危险计算指南》的计算精度有了可喜的提高。2018年标准使用的经验数据显示,在250VAC以下,某些电弧持续存在,而其他电弧无法持续存在。2002年标准中的“<240V和<125kVA变压器”例外已被“≤240V(标称)和<2000A(短路电流)”语言所取代,其中包括在实际测试中不持续的一段电弧。先前发表的论文建议对这一领域进行进一步研究,然而,在1584-2018年工作委员会可用的有限资源范围内,并非所有请求都能实现。本文研究了电弧可持续性指南(<250VAC设备)是否与IEEE、电力研究所(EPRI)和其他机构提供的经验电弧测试数据相匹配,同时考虑到新的发展和对电弧物理的更好理解。它使用最近在公用事业和工业中进行的研究数据来确定标准保守性范围的影响(如果有的话)。本文最后为可能受保守结果影响的用户提供了一种使用NFPA 70E®- 2021的更详细的方法,并建议在哪些领域进行额外的测试和研究可能使最终用户受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Detailed Approach for ARC Flash Sustainability for Systems at or Below 240V and Over 2000A
The IEEE Std. 1584–2018 IEEE Guide for Performing Arc Flash Hazard Calculations has seen a welcome improvement in calculation accuracy from the 2002 version. Empirical data used for the 2018 standard shows that below 250VAC certain arcs sustained while other arcs failed to sustain. The “<240V and <125kVA transformer” exception in the 2002 standard has been replaced by “≤240V (nominal) and <2000A (short-circuit current)” language, that includes a band of arcs that did not sustain during practical testing. Previously published papers suggested further research into this area, however, within the finite resources available to the 1584–2018 working committee, not all requests could materialize. This paper investigates whether guidelines for arc sustainability (<250VAC equipment) match the empirical arc testing data available from IEEE, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), and others while considering new developments and a better understating of arc physics. It uses recent data from studies performed at utilities and industry to determine the impact (if any) of a range of conservatism in the standard. This paper concludes by presenting a more detailed approach using NFPA 70E® - 2021 for users who may be affected by conservative results and suggests areas where additional testing and research may benefit end-users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信