印度时装业的山寨文化及知识产权保护需求分析

Ena Kapur
{"title":"印度时装业的山寨文化及知识产权保护需求分析","authors":"Ena Kapur","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3875108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper analyzes the role of intellectual property protection vis-à-vis the fashion industry. The Piracy Paradox coined by law professors Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman in the United States has led to imitation becoming an inescapable reality for designers all around the world on the astonishing pretext that is “imitation sparks innovation.” Presenting a critique of the Paradox in the Indian scenario in Part 1 of the paper, the author stresses upon the need for securing proper laws to protect the heart of the fashion industry, that is original artistic expressions. In Part 2 of the paper, whilst examining judicial decisions in India, the author argues that the present laws are riddled with loopholes that have resulted in a proliferation of cheap knock-offs that not only hamper the creative process of a brand, but negatively impact its exclusive reputation as well as its revenue. The infamous idea presented by the Piracy Paradox coupled with a lacunae in the laws have cost not only big fashion brands and designers but also disrupted the emergence of businesses in the nascent stages. To conclude, solutions have been proposed to dismantle the notion propounded by the Piracy Paradox and strengthen the laws in place to ensure fair and just competition in the economy.","PeriodicalId":205967,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Knockoff Culture and the need for IP protection in the Fashion Industry in India\",\"authors\":\"Ena Kapur\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3875108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper analyzes the role of intellectual property protection vis-à-vis the fashion industry. The Piracy Paradox coined by law professors Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman in the United States has led to imitation becoming an inescapable reality for designers all around the world on the astonishing pretext that is “imitation sparks innovation.” Presenting a critique of the Paradox in the Indian scenario in Part 1 of the paper, the author stresses upon the need for securing proper laws to protect the heart of the fashion industry, that is original artistic expressions. In Part 2 of the paper, whilst examining judicial decisions in India, the author argues that the present laws are riddled with loopholes that have resulted in a proliferation of cheap knock-offs that not only hamper the creative process of a brand, but negatively impact its exclusive reputation as well as its revenue. The infamous idea presented by the Piracy Paradox coupled with a lacunae in the laws have cost not only big fashion brands and designers but also disrupted the emergence of businesses in the nascent stages. To conclude, solutions have been proposed to dismantle the notion propounded by the Piracy Paradox and strengthen the laws in place to ensure fair and just competition in the economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了知识产权保护对-à-vis时尚产业的作用。美国法学教授Kal Raustiala和Christopher Sprigman提出的“盗版悖论”(Piracy Paradox)以“模仿激发创新”为借口,导致模仿成为世界各地设计师无法逃避的现实。在本文的第一部分中,作者对印度场景中的悖论提出了批评,强调需要确保适当的法律来保护时尚产业的核心,即原创的艺术表达。在论文的第2部分,在审查印度的司法决定的同时,作者认为,目前的法律漏洞百出,导致廉价仿冒品的泛滥,不仅阻碍了品牌的创作过程,而且对其独家声誉和收入产生了负面影响。盗版悖论提出的臭名昭著的想法,加上法律上的漏洞,不仅让大型时尚品牌和设计师付出了代价,而且还扰乱了萌芽阶段的商业发展。总之,已经提出了解决方案,以消除盗版悖论所提出的概念,并加强适当的法律,以确保公平和公正的经济竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Knockoff Culture and the need for IP protection in the Fashion Industry in India
The present paper analyzes the role of intellectual property protection vis-à-vis the fashion industry. The Piracy Paradox coined by law professors Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman in the United States has led to imitation becoming an inescapable reality for designers all around the world on the astonishing pretext that is “imitation sparks innovation.” Presenting a critique of the Paradox in the Indian scenario in Part 1 of the paper, the author stresses upon the need for securing proper laws to protect the heart of the fashion industry, that is original artistic expressions. In Part 2 of the paper, whilst examining judicial decisions in India, the author argues that the present laws are riddled with loopholes that have resulted in a proliferation of cheap knock-offs that not only hamper the creative process of a brand, but negatively impact its exclusive reputation as well as its revenue. The infamous idea presented by the Piracy Paradox coupled with a lacunae in the laws have cost not only big fashion brands and designers but also disrupted the emergence of businesses in the nascent stages. To conclude, solutions have been proposed to dismantle the notion propounded by the Piracy Paradox and strengthen the laws in place to ensure fair and just competition in the economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信