引言:重新想象移民世代

Mette Louise Berg, Suzanne Eckstein
{"title":"引言:重新想象移民世代","authors":"Mette Louise Berg, Suzanne Eckstein","doi":"10.1353/dsp.2015.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We live in an era of globalization involving large-scale international migration and increasing transnational connectedness that have con- tributed to the emergence and growth of diaspora communities. In this context, questions of how diaspora migrants adapt to host societies and engage with their homelands are becoming increasingly important economically, politically, socially, and culturally—to diasporic groups themselves, to their homelands, and to the countries where they settle. Yet little is known about internal diversity and stratification within indi- vidual diasporas. Our understanding of how pre-migration experiences shape migrants' adaptation where they resettle and their homeland in- volvements, as well as their relations to other diaspora members settled elsewhere, remains especially inadequate. This Introduction and the special issue more generally advance the understanding of diasporas and their internal diversity, analytically and descriptively, through a his- torically grounded conceptual generational frame. The concept of generation has been fundamental to the scholarly understanding of migrant adaptation, especially within the assimilation- ist and transnational frameworks. Most typically, studies of migrant generations focus on contrasts between the foreign-born, defined as the first generation, and their progeny, born where they resettle and defined as the second generation. In these studies, generation is used in the sense of kinship descent, focused on genealogical remove from the per- son within a family who moved to a new country. Within the social sciences more broadly, as David Kertzer (1983) has shown, generation is also used to refer to age- or birth date-based cohorts with distinctive historical experiences, as in \"the 1968 generation\" or \"generation Y\" ;t o life-stage groups, such as \"the college generation\"; and to people living in a particular historical period, such as \"the generation of 1914.\" These meanings of generation are distinct from each other, but as Nancy Diaspora 18:1/2 (2009) / published Winter 2015","PeriodicalId":119873,"journal":{"name":"Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Reimagining Migrant Generations\",\"authors\":\"Mette Louise Berg, Suzanne Eckstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dsp.2015.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We live in an era of globalization involving large-scale international migration and increasing transnational connectedness that have con- tributed to the emergence and growth of diaspora communities. In this context, questions of how diaspora migrants adapt to host societies and engage with their homelands are becoming increasingly important economically, politically, socially, and culturally—to diasporic groups themselves, to their homelands, and to the countries where they settle. Yet little is known about internal diversity and stratification within indi- vidual diasporas. Our understanding of how pre-migration experiences shape migrants' adaptation where they resettle and their homeland in- volvements, as well as their relations to other diaspora members settled elsewhere, remains especially inadequate. This Introduction and the special issue more generally advance the understanding of diasporas and their internal diversity, analytically and descriptively, through a his- torically grounded conceptual generational frame. The concept of generation has been fundamental to the scholarly understanding of migrant adaptation, especially within the assimilation- ist and transnational frameworks. Most typically, studies of migrant generations focus on contrasts between the foreign-born, defined as the first generation, and their progeny, born where they resettle and defined as the second generation. In these studies, generation is used in the sense of kinship descent, focused on genealogical remove from the per- son within a family who moved to a new country. Within the social sciences more broadly, as David Kertzer (1983) has shown, generation is also used to refer to age- or birth date-based cohorts with distinctive historical experiences, as in \\\"the 1968 generation\\\" or \\\"generation Y\\\" ;t o life-stage groups, such as \\\"the college generation\\\"; and to people living in a particular historical period, such as \\\"the generation of 1914.\\\" These meanings of generation are distinct from each other, but as Nancy Diaspora 18:1/2 (2009) / published Winter 2015\",\"PeriodicalId\":119873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.2015.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dsp.2015.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

我们生活在一个全球化的时代,涉及大规模的国际移民和日益增加的跨国联系,这有助于侨民社区的出现和发展。在这种背景下,散居移民如何适应东道国社会并与祖国接触的问题在经济、政治、社会和文化方面变得越来越重要——对散居群体本身、对他们的祖国以及对他们定居的国家都是如此。然而,人们对个别散居者的内部多样性和分层却知之甚少。我们对移民前的经历如何影响移民对他们重新定居的地方和他们的家园的适应,以及他们与其他定居在其他地方的散居成员的关系的理解仍然特别不足。本导言和特刊通过一个以历史为基础的世代概念框架,以分析和描述的方式,更广泛地推进了对流散者及其内部多样性的理解。代际概念一直是移民适应的学术理解的基础,特别是在同化主义和跨国框架内。最典型的是,对移民世代的研究集中在外国出生的第一代和他们的后代之间的对比,他们出生在他们重新定居的地方,被定义为第二代。在这些研究中,世代是在亲属血统的意义上使用的,重点是在一个家庭中移居到一个新国家的人的宗谱上的变化。在更广泛的社会科学中,正如David Kertzer(1983)所表明的,generation也用于指具有不同历史经历的年龄或出生日期为基础的群体,如“1968一代”或“Y一代”;或生命阶段群体,如“大学一代”;以及生活在特定历史时期的人,比如“1914年的一代”。这些generation的含义彼此不同,但正如Nancy Diaspora 18:1/2 (2009) / 2015 Winter出版的那样
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: Reimagining Migrant Generations
We live in an era of globalization involving large-scale international migration and increasing transnational connectedness that have con- tributed to the emergence and growth of diaspora communities. In this context, questions of how diaspora migrants adapt to host societies and engage with their homelands are becoming increasingly important economically, politically, socially, and culturally—to diasporic groups themselves, to their homelands, and to the countries where they settle. Yet little is known about internal diversity and stratification within indi- vidual diasporas. Our understanding of how pre-migration experiences shape migrants' adaptation where they resettle and their homeland in- volvements, as well as their relations to other diaspora members settled elsewhere, remains especially inadequate. This Introduction and the special issue more generally advance the understanding of diasporas and their internal diversity, analytically and descriptively, through a his- torically grounded conceptual generational frame. The concept of generation has been fundamental to the scholarly understanding of migrant adaptation, especially within the assimilation- ist and transnational frameworks. Most typically, studies of migrant generations focus on contrasts between the foreign-born, defined as the first generation, and their progeny, born where they resettle and defined as the second generation. In these studies, generation is used in the sense of kinship descent, focused on genealogical remove from the per- son within a family who moved to a new country. Within the social sciences more broadly, as David Kertzer (1983) has shown, generation is also used to refer to age- or birth date-based cohorts with distinctive historical experiences, as in "the 1968 generation" or "generation Y" ;t o life-stage groups, such as "the college generation"; and to people living in a particular historical period, such as "the generation of 1914." These meanings of generation are distinct from each other, but as Nancy Diaspora 18:1/2 (2009) / published Winter 2015
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信