未能签署乌克兰-欧盟联系国协议(2013年10月至11月)

V. Denysenko
{"title":"未能签署乌克兰-欧盟联系国协议(2013年10月至11月)","authors":"V. Denysenko","doi":"10.21272/starovyna.2019.55.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The failure to sign the Association Agreement with the EU in autumn 2013 has been\ninvestigated. The role of the Russian factor, which became decisive in the foreign policy reversal of the Yanukovych regime, has been revealed. The importance of Viktor Yanukovych’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on October 27, 2013, in the dramatic change of Ukraine’s international vector has been emphasized. On the basis of diplomats’ memoirs, the assumption about intimidation of the Ukrainian President by the Russian side has been substantiated. The timeline of the preparation of the 2013 Vilnius Summit, the position of EU structures and the attempts of the fourth President of Ukraine to win time to trade with the Russians have been reproduced. The thesis about the Donetsk clan’s attempts to prepare public opinion for a 180 degree turn in late October - early November 2013 has been presented. For this purpose, demonstration meetings were organized with representatives of Ukrainian business and trade\nunions, who called for revision of plans for European integration on their own initiative. The main role in manipulating public opinion rested on the government of Mykola Azarov and the Verkhovna Rada, which had a majority coalition led by the Party of Regions. Instead, Viktor Yanukovych continued his European integration rhetoric and reiterated to Western partners his own willingness to sign the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. On November 21, the real position of the ruling elite was made available to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. According to it, the process of preparation for the signing of the Association Agreement was suspended, the proposal was made for the trilateral Ukraine-EU-Russia negotiations, and the ministries were tasked with developing measures to maintain economic ties with the CIS countries. The decision was rejected by European partners and led to Yanukovych’s attempts to find other ways to thwart the signing of the Agreement. It has been proved that this role was played by Yanukovych’s requirements for financial assistance from the EU amounting to about 160 billion euros, which aimed to prevent the signing of the Association Agreement.\nKey words: Viktor Yanukovych, association of Ukraine with the EU, эYulia Tymoshenko,\nEuropean integration, Pat Cox, Alexander Kwasniewski, Vladimir Putin.","PeriodicalId":332840,"journal":{"name":"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE FAILURE TO SIGN THE UKRAINE-EU ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT (OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2013)\",\"authors\":\"V. Denysenko\",\"doi\":\"10.21272/starovyna.2019.55.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The failure to sign the Association Agreement with the EU in autumn 2013 has been\\ninvestigated. The role of the Russian factor, which became decisive in the foreign policy reversal of the Yanukovych regime, has been revealed. The importance of Viktor Yanukovych’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on October 27, 2013, in the dramatic change of Ukraine’s international vector has been emphasized. On the basis of diplomats’ memoirs, the assumption about intimidation of the Ukrainian President by the Russian side has been substantiated. The timeline of the preparation of the 2013 Vilnius Summit, the position of EU structures and the attempts of the fourth President of Ukraine to win time to trade with the Russians have been reproduced. The thesis about the Donetsk clan’s attempts to prepare public opinion for a 180 degree turn in late October - early November 2013 has been presented. For this purpose, demonstration meetings were organized with representatives of Ukrainian business and trade\\nunions, who called for revision of plans for European integration on their own initiative. The main role in manipulating public opinion rested on the government of Mykola Azarov and the Verkhovna Rada, which had a majority coalition led by the Party of Regions. Instead, Viktor Yanukovych continued his European integration rhetoric and reiterated to Western partners his own willingness to sign the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. On November 21, the real position of the ruling elite was made available to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. According to it, the process of preparation for the signing of the Association Agreement was suspended, the proposal was made for the trilateral Ukraine-EU-Russia negotiations, and the ministries were tasked with developing measures to maintain economic ties with the CIS countries. The decision was rejected by European partners and led to Yanukovych’s attempts to find other ways to thwart the signing of the Agreement. It has been proved that this role was played by Yanukovych’s requirements for financial assistance from the EU amounting to about 160 billion euros, which aimed to prevent the signing of the Association Agreement.\\nKey words: Viktor Yanukovych, association of Ukraine with the EU, эYulia Tymoshenko,\\nEuropean integration, Pat Cox, Alexander Kwasniewski, Vladimir Putin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21272/starovyna.2019.55.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/starovyna.2019.55.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2013年秋季未能与欧盟签署联系国协议一事已被调查。在推翻亚努科维奇政权的外交政策中起决定性作用的俄罗斯因素已经显露出来。2013年10月27日,维克多·亚努科维奇与俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京的会晤在乌克兰国际地位的巨大变化中发挥了重要作用。根据外交官的回忆录,关于俄罗斯方面恐吓乌克兰总统的假设得到了证实。2013年维尔纽斯峰会的筹备时间表,欧盟结构的立场以及乌克兰第四任总统争取时间与俄罗斯进行贸易的尝试都被复制。关于顿涅茨克家族试图在2013年10月底至11月初让公众舆论180度大转弯的论点已经提出。为此目的,与乌克兰商业和工会的代表组织了示范会议,他们要求根据自己的倡议修订欧洲一体化计划。操纵公众舆论的主要角色是尼古拉·阿扎罗夫(Mykola Azarov)政府和最高拉达(Verkhovna Rada),他们拥有一个由地区党领导的多数联盟。相反,亚努科维奇继续他的欧洲一体化言论,并向西方伙伴重申他愿意签署乌克兰与欧盟之间的联系国协议。11月21日,乌克兰内阁部长得知了统治精英的真实立场。根据该文件,签署联系国协议的准备工作被暂停,乌克兰-欧盟-俄罗斯三方谈判的提议被提出,各部委的任务是制定与独联体国家保持经济联系的措施。这一决定遭到了欧洲伙伴国的反对,导致亚努科维奇试图寻找其他方法来阻止协议的签署。事实证明,亚努科维奇要求欧盟提供约1600亿欧元的财政援助起到了这一作用,其目的是阻止《联系国协定》的签署。关键词:亚努科维奇,乌克兰加入欧盟,эYulia季莫申科,欧洲一体化,考克斯,克瓦希涅夫斯基,普京
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE FAILURE TO SIGN THE UKRAINE-EU ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT (OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2013)
The failure to sign the Association Agreement with the EU in autumn 2013 has been investigated. The role of the Russian factor, which became decisive in the foreign policy reversal of the Yanukovych regime, has been revealed. The importance of Viktor Yanukovych’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on October 27, 2013, in the dramatic change of Ukraine’s international vector has been emphasized. On the basis of diplomats’ memoirs, the assumption about intimidation of the Ukrainian President by the Russian side has been substantiated. The timeline of the preparation of the 2013 Vilnius Summit, the position of EU structures and the attempts of the fourth President of Ukraine to win time to trade with the Russians have been reproduced. The thesis about the Donetsk clan’s attempts to prepare public opinion for a 180 degree turn in late October - early November 2013 has been presented. For this purpose, demonstration meetings were organized with representatives of Ukrainian business and trade unions, who called for revision of plans for European integration on their own initiative. The main role in manipulating public opinion rested on the government of Mykola Azarov and the Verkhovna Rada, which had a majority coalition led by the Party of Regions. Instead, Viktor Yanukovych continued his European integration rhetoric and reiterated to Western partners his own willingness to sign the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU. On November 21, the real position of the ruling elite was made available to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. According to it, the process of preparation for the signing of the Association Agreement was suspended, the proposal was made for the trilateral Ukraine-EU-Russia negotiations, and the ministries were tasked with developing measures to maintain economic ties with the CIS countries. The decision was rejected by European partners and led to Yanukovych’s attempts to find other ways to thwart the signing of the Agreement. It has been proved that this role was played by Yanukovych’s requirements for financial assistance from the EU amounting to about 160 billion euros, which aimed to prevent the signing of the Association Agreement. Key words: Viktor Yanukovych, association of Ukraine with the EU, эYulia Tymoshenko, European integration, Pat Cox, Alexander Kwasniewski, Vladimir Putin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信