T. Amphansap, Chatdanai Phan-udom, P. Chotiyarnwong, Nitirat Stitkitti, Atiporn Therdyothin
{"title":"泰国骨质疏松症药物治疗的适当FRAX®干预阈值","authors":"T. Amphansap, Chatdanai Phan-udom, P. Chotiyarnwong, Nitirat Stitkitti, Atiporn Therdyothin","doi":"10.56929/jseaortho-022-0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) has been recommended and incorporated into osteoporotic guidelines worldwide to assess fracture risk and promptly diagnose osteoporosis when bone mineral density is unavailable. However, a country-specific intervention threshold for Thai patients remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify an appropriate cut-off point for the 10-year probability of hip fracture (HF), specifically in the Thai population.\nMethods: This retrospective cohort study included members of the Thai population aged 50-90 years, enrolled from January 2018 to January 2020. Analysis of data collected from online FRAX® tool questionnaires was conducted and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a new appropriate cut-off value as the intervention threshold.\nResults: A total of 1,311 (HF: 422 [32.2%], non-HF: 889 [67.8%]) participants were included. The FRAX® 10-year probability of fracture in patients with HF was significantly higher than in non-HF (5.8% ± 4% vs. 4.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas the probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) was similar (11.0 ± 5.8% vs. 10.6 ± 6.2%, P = 0.27). The ROC curve revealed a new intervention threshold for the FRAX®-based 10-year risk for HF of 4.3% with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval: 0.632 (range: 0.602-0.663; P < 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of 62.9% and 60.7%, respectively.\nConclusions: The intervention threshold cut-off value for osteoporosis treatment among the Thai population was 4.3%, which is higher than the cut-off point recommended in the Thai national guidelines.","PeriodicalId":333749,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate FRAX® Intervention Threshold for Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"T. Amphansap, Chatdanai Phan-udom, P. Chotiyarnwong, Nitirat Stitkitti, Atiporn Therdyothin\",\"doi\":\"10.56929/jseaortho-022-0158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) has been recommended and incorporated into osteoporotic guidelines worldwide to assess fracture risk and promptly diagnose osteoporosis when bone mineral density is unavailable. However, a country-specific intervention threshold for Thai patients remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify an appropriate cut-off point for the 10-year probability of hip fracture (HF), specifically in the Thai population.\\nMethods: This retrospective cohort study included members of the Thai population aged 50-90 years, enrolled from January 2018 to January 2020. Analysis of data collected from online FRAX® tool questionnaires was conducted and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a new appropriate cut-off value as the intervention threshold.\\nResults: A total of 1,311 (HF: 422 [32.2%], non-HF: 889 [67.8%]) participants were included. The FRAX® 10-year probability of fracture in patients with HF was significantly higher than in non-HF (5.8% ± 4% vs. 4.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas the probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) was similar (11.0 ± 5.8% vs. 10.6 ± 6.2%, P = 0.27). The ROC curve revealed a new intervention threshold for the FRAX®-based 10-year risk for HF of 4.3% with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval: 0.632 (range: 0.602-0.663; P < 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of 62.9% and 60.7%, respectively.\\nConclusions: The intervention threshold cut-off value for osteoporosis treatment among the Thai population was 4.3%, which is higher than the cut-off point recommended in the Thai national guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-022-0158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-022-0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®)已被推荐并纳入世界范围内的骨质疏松指南,以评估骨折风险并在骨矿物质密度不可用时及时诊断骨质疏松症。然而,泰国患者的特定国家干预阈值仍然未知。因此,我们的目的是确定一个合适的10年髋部骨折(HF)概率的分界点,特别是在泰国人群中。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年1月至2020年1月登记的年龄在50-90岁之间的泰国人群。对在线FRAX®工具问卷收集的数据进行分析,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定一个新的适当的截止值作为干预阈值。结果:共纳入1311名参与者(HF: 422[32.2%],非HF: 889[67.8%])。HF患者FRAX®10年骨折概率显著高于非HF患者(分别为5.8%±4% vs. 4.7%±4.5%);P < 0.01),而严重骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的发生率相似(11.0±5.8% vs. 10.6±6.2%,P = 0.27)。ROC曲线显示,基于FRAX®的HF 10年风险的新干预阈值为4.3%,曲线下面积(AUC)最大(95%置信区间:0.632(范围:0.602-0.663;P < 0.001),敏感性为62.9%,特异性为60.7%。结论:泰国人群骨质疏松治疗的干预阈值临界值为4.3%,高于泰国国家指南推荐的临界值。
Appropriate FRAX® Intervention Threshold for Pharmacological Treatment of Osteoporosis in Thailand
Purpose: The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) has been recommended and incorporated into osteoporotic guidelines worldwide to assess fracture risk and promptly diagnose osteoporosis when bone mineral density is unavailable. However, a country-specific intervention threshold for Thai patients remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to identify an appropriate cut-off point for the 10-year probability of hip fracture (HF), specifically in the Thai population.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included members of the Thai population aged 50-90 years, enrolled from January 2018 to January 2020. Analysis of data collected from online FRAX® tool questionnaires was conducted and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a new appropriate cut-off value as the intervention threshold.
Results: A total of 1,311 (HF: 422 [32.2%], non-HF: 889 [67.8%]) participants were included. The FRAX® 10-year probability of fracture in patients with HF was significantly higher than in non-HF (5.8% ± 4% vs. 4.7% ± 4.5%, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas the probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) was similar (11.0 ± 5.8% vs. 10.6 ± 6.2%, P = 0.27). The ROC curve revealed a new intervention threshold for the FRAX®-based 10-year risk for HF of 4.3% with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval: 0.632 (range: 0.602-0.663; P < 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of 62.9% and 60.7%, respectively.
Conclusions: The intervention threshold cut-off value for osteoporosis treatment among the Thai population was 4.3%, which is higher than the cut-off point recommended in the Thai national guidelines.