“在数字时代执法——欧洲的一项关键任务

Winfried Bausback
{"title":"“在数字时代执法——欧洲的一项关键任务","authors":"Winfried Bausback","doi":"10.5771/9783748921561-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, the forthcoming European Parliament elections in May2 are being described as a battle to decide Europe’s destiny. This is partly because Europe is often no longer regarded as a great achievement; instead, there are forces muscling into the European Parliament whose intention is none other than to destroy what Europe was once meant to be – an economic community and a community of shared values. The unbearably relentless wrangling about Brexit may have encouraged this alienation from Europe, but it would be far too simple to blame this shift first and foremost on the turmoil in the British House of Commons – because an achievement is always only as great as its perceived benefit to society. And, to overstate the argument somewhat, the acceptance of Europe will be decided not by major geopolitical issues like Brexit or by piecemeal regulations like the bans on lead pouring, drinking straws or cotton buds, but by how it handles the really important, socially relevant responsibilities and challenges. One such challenge is to manage the effects and excesses of the digital transformation process. In many areas of our lives, digitalisation is indispensable, and the same is true for a united Europe. It makes us what we are today: a modern information society. At the same time, however, the digital transformation can also represent an existential threat to this very society. Looking at the last 12 months alone, data integrity has simply taken far too many blows. In March 2018 it was discovered that the meanwhile bankrupt company Cambridge Analytica had used what was supposedly an academic research app to unlawfully harvest the personal details of tens of millions of Facebook users to then manipulate voters with targeted messages during the US election campaign. In September 2018, a security","PeriodicalId":326055,"journal":{"name":"Turning Point in Data Protection Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Enforcing the law in the digital era – a key task for Europe”1\",\"authors\":\"Winfried Bausback\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748921561-105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increasingly, the forthcoming European Parliament elections in May2 are being described as a battle to decide Europe’s destiny. This is partly because Europe is often no longer regarded as a great achievement; instead, there are forces muscling into the European Parliament whose intention is none other than to destroy what Europe was once meant to be – an economic community and a community of shared values. The unbearably relentless wrangling about Brexit may have encouraged this alienation from Europe, but it would be far too simple to blame this shift first and foremost on the turmoil in the British House of Commons – because an achievement is always only as great as its perceived benefit to society. And, to overstate the argument somewhat, the acceptance of Europe will be decided not by major geopolitical issues like Brexit or by piecemeal regulations like the bans on lead pouring, drinking straws or cotton buds, but by how it handles the really important, socially relevant responsibilities and challenges. One such challenge is to manage the effects and excesses of the digital transformation process. In many areas of our lives, digitalisation is indispensable, and the same is true for a united Europe. It makes us what we are today: a modern information society. At the same time, however, the digital transformation can also represent an existential threat to this very society. Looking at the last 12 months alone, data integrity has simply taken far too many blows. In March 2018 it was discovered that the meanwhile bankrupt company Cambridge Analytica had used what was supposedly an academic research app to unlawfully harvest the personal details of tens of millions of Facebook users to then manipulate voters with targeted messages during the US election campaign. In September 2018, a security\",\"PeriodicalId\":326055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turning Point in Data Protection Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turning Point in Data Protection Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921561-105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turning Point in Data Protection Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921561-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即将于5月2日举行的欧洲议会(European Parliament)选举越来越多地被形容为一场决定欧洲命运的战役。部分原因在于,欧洲往往不再被视为一个伟大的成就;相反,一些势力正在强行进入欧洲议会,它们的目的无非是要摧毁欧洲曾经的理想——一个经济共同体和一个拥有共同价值观的共同体。关于英国退欧的无休止争吵可能助长了这种与欧洲的疏远,但将这种转变首先归咎于英国下议院的动荡,这太简单了——因为一项成就的伟大程度,总是取决于它对社会的好处。而且,夸大其词地说,对欧洲的接受程度将不是由英国退欧等重大地缘政治问题,也不是由禁止倒铅、禁止使用吸管或禁止使用棉签等零零碎碎的规定决定的,而是由它如何处理真正重要的、与社会相关的责任和挑战决定的。其中一个挑战是管理数字化转型过程的影响和过度。在我们生活的许多领域,数字化是不可或缺的,对于一个统一的欧洲来说也是如此。它使我们成为今天的样子:一个现代信息社会。然而,与此同时,数字化转型也可能对这个社会的生存构成威胁。仅看过去12个月,数据完整性就遭受了太多打击。2018年3月,同时破产的剑桥分析公司被发现使用一款据称是学术研究的应用程序非法获取数千万Facebook用户的个人信息,然后在美国大选期间用有针对性的信息操纵选民。2018年9月,某证券
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Enforcing the law in the digital era – a key task for Europe”1
Increasingly, the forthcoming European Parliament elections in May2 are being described as a battle to decide Europe’s destiny. This is partly because Europe is often no longer regarded as a great achievement; instead, there are forces muscling into the European Parliament whose intention is none other than to destroy what Europe was once meant to be – an economic community and a community of shared values. The unbearably relentless wrangling about Brexit may have encouraged this alienation from Europe, but it would be far too simple to blame this shift first and foremost on the turmoil in the British House of Commons – because an achievement is always only as great as its perceived benefit to society. And, to overstate the argument somewhat, the acceptance of Europe will be decided not by major geopolitical issues like Brexit or by piecemeal regulations like the bans on lead pouring, drinking straws or cotton buds, but by how it handles the really important, socially relevant responsibilities and challenges. One such challenge is to manage the effects and excesses of the digital transformation process. In many areas of our lives, digitalisation is indispensable, and the same is true for a united Europe. It makes us what we are today: a modern information society. At the same time, however, the digital transformation can also represent an existential threat to this very society. Looking at the last 12 months alone, data integrity has simply taken far too many blows. In March 2018 it was discovered that the meanwhile bankrupt company Cambridge Analytica had used what was supposedly an academic research app to unlawfully harvest the personal details of tens of millions of Facebook users to then manipulate voters with targeted messages during the US election campaign. In September 2018, a security
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信