{"title":"节约法律D-B8","authors":"J. Ramseyer","doi":"10.15779/Z38ZG37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implicitly extending Stigler (1977), William Klein proposes a lexicon of twenty-eight generic arguments for normative corporate law scholarship in Criteria for Good Laws of Business Association. He suggests that adopting the lexicon would enhance the efficiency and precision of legal debate. Workable? Hardly. Since when, after all, do we select our colleagues for their communicative efficiency or precision? Yet perhaps Criteria is not about communicative efficiency at all. Perhaps it is about content-and the vacuum at the heart of most legal scholarship-instead. t Mitsubishi Professor of Japanese Legal Studies, Harvard University. I gratefully acknowledge the comments and assistance of Mitu Gulati, Fred McChesney, Eric Rasmusen, Roberta Romano, Mark West, and the participants at the Mercatus Center conference in honor of Bill Klein; and the generous financial assistance of the John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics & Business (\"you used our money to write that?\") at the Harvard Law School. Berkeley Business Law Journal Vol. 2.1, 2005 Economizing Legal D-B8 Economizing Legal D-B8","PeriodicalId":326069,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economizing Legal D-B8\",\"authors\":\"J. Ramseyer\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38ZG37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Implicitly extending Stigler (1977), William Klein proposes a lexicon of twenty-eight generic arguments for normative corporate law scholarship in Criteria for Good Laws of Business Association. He suggests that adopting the lexicon would enhance the efficiency and precision of legal debate. Workable? Hardly. Since when, after all, do we select our colleagues for their communicative efficiency or precision? Yet perhaps Criteria is not about communicative efficiency at all. Perhaps it is about content-and the vacuum at the heart of most legal scholarship-instead. t Mitsubishi Professor of Japanese Legal Studies, Harvard University. I gratefully acknowledge the comments and assistance of Mitu Gulati, Fred McChesney, Eric Rasmusen, Roberta Romano, Mark West, and the participants at the Mercatus Center conference in honor of Bill Klein; and the generous financial assistance of the John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics & Business (\\\"you used our money to write that?\\\") at the Harvard Law School. Berkeley Business Law Journal Vol. 2.1, 2005 Economizing Legal D-B8 Economizing Legal D-B8\",\"PeriodicalId\":326069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Business Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Business Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZG37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZG37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
威廉·克莱因(William Klein)含蓄地扩展了斯蒂格勒(1977),在《商业协会好法标准》(Criteria for Good Laws of Business Association)一书中为规范性公司法学术提出了28个通用论点的词典。他建议,采用该词典将提高法律辩论的效率和准确性。可行的吗?几乎没有。毕竟,从什么时候开始,我们选择同事的标准是他们的沟通效率或准确性?然而,或许《标准》根本就不是关于沟通效率的。也许这是关于内容——以及大多数法律学术核心的真空——的问题。哈佛大学日本法律研究三菱教授。我感谢米图·古拉蒂、弗雷德·麦克切斯尼、埃里克·拉斯穆森、罗伯塔·罗马诺、马克·韦斯特以及出席纪念比尔·克莱因的莫卡特斯中心会议的与会者的评论和协助;以及哈佛法学院约翰·m·奥林法律、经济与商业中心的慷慨资助(“你用我们的钱写的?”)。《加州大学伯克利分校商法学刊》2005年第1期
Implicitly extending Stigler (1977), William Klein proposes a lexicon of twenty-eight generic arguments for normative corporate law scholarship in Criteria for Good Laws of Business Association. He suggests that adopting the lexicon would enhance the efficiency and precision of legal debate. Workable? Hardly. Since when, after all, do we select our colleagues for their communicative efficiency or precision? Yet perhaps Criteria is not about communicative efficiency at all. Perhaps it is about content-and the vacuum at the heart of most legal scholarship-instead. t Mitsubishi Professor of Japanese Legal Studies, Harvard University. I gratefully acknowledge the comments and assistance of Mitu Gulati, Fred McChesney, Eric Rasmusen, Roberta Romano, Mark West, and the participants at the Mercatus Center conference in honor of Bill Klein; and the generous financial assistance of the John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics & Business ("you used our money to write that?") at the Harvard Law School. Berkeley Business Law Journal Vol. 2.1, 2005 Economizing Legal D-B8 Economizing Legal D-B8