{"title":"分布式分支定界算法的负载平衡","authors":"Reinhard Lüling, B. Monien","doi":"10.1109/IPPS.1992.222970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present a new load balancing strategy and its application to distributed branch & bound algorithms and demonstrate its efficiency by solving some NP-complete problems on a network of up to 256 transputers. The parallelization of their branch & bound algorithm is fully distributed. Every processor performs the same algorithm but each on a different part of the solution tree. In this case it is necessary to distribute subproblems among the processors to achieve a well balanced workload. Their load balancing method overcomes the problem of search overhead and idle times by an appropriate load model and avoids trashing effects by a feedback control method. Using this strategy they were able to achieve a speedup of up to 237.32 on a 256 processor network for very short parallel computation times, compared to an efficient sequential algorithm.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":340070,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load balancing for distributed branch & bound algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Reinhard Lüling, B. Monien\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPPS.1992.222970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors present a new load balancing strategy and its application to distributed branch & bound algorithms and demonstrate its efficiency by solving some NP-complete problems on a network of up to 256 transputers. The parallelization of their branch & bound algorithm is fully distributed. Every processor performs the same algorithm but each on a different part of the solution tree. In this case it is necessary to distribute subproblems among the processors to achieve a well balanced workload. Their load balancing method overcomes the problem of search overhead and idle times by an appropriate load model and avoids trashing effects by a feedback control method. Using this strategy they were able to achieve a speedup of up to 237.32 on a 256 processor network for very short parallel computation times, compared to an efficient sequential algorithm.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":340070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1992.222970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Sixth International Parallel Processing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPPS.1992.222970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Load balancing for distributed branch & bound algorithms
The authors present a new load balancing strategy and its application to distributed branch & bound algorithms and demonstrate its efficiency by solving some NP-complete problems on a network of up to 256 transputers. The parallelization of their branch & bound algorithm is fully distributed. Every processor performs the same algorithm but each on a different part of the solution tree. In this case it is necessary to distribute subproblems among the processors to achieve a well balanced workload. Their load balancing method overcomes the problem of search overhead and idle times by an appropriate load model and avoids trashing effects by a feedback control method. Using this strategy they were able to achieve a speedup of up to 237.32 on a 256 processor network for very short parallel computation times, compared to an efficient sequential algorithm.<>