Murabahah的会计-审查对独家会计准则的需要

O. Siddiqui, Muhammad Khaleequzzaman, M. S. Afzal
{"title":"Murabahah的会计-审查对独家会计准则的需要","authors":"O. Siddiqui, Muhammad Khaleequzzaman, M. S. Afzal","doi":"10.51239/nrjss.vi.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:\nThis paper examines the need for exclusive financial reporting standards for Islamic financial transactions by considering the accounting treatment of deferred payment Murabahah, as practiced in Pakistan. Being analogous to the conventional banking model, Murabahah is one of the most widely deployed modes in Islamic banks. The paper compares the quality of presentation of deferred payment Murabahah as practiced, following both conventional and Islamic accounting standards.\nDesign:\nThe paper presents the deferred payment Murabahah (credit sale) using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and Islamic Financial Accounting Standards (IFASs) and collects the opinion of experts (accountants, academicians, and Islamic bankers) on the extracts of the prepared financial statements. The opinions are centered on three qualitative characteristics of the financial information (relevance, faithful representation, and comparability) and a t-test is applied to examine the statistical significance of the difference of opinions received.\nFindings:\nThe results show that the overall quality score for IFRSs is higher than the IFASs for the selected qualitative characteristics. However, the difference observed is not significant, advocating the possibility of the harmonization among both Islamic and conventional accounting practices of the financial intuitions operating in Pakistan.\nOriginality:\nEarlier studies (Morshed (2022); El-Halaby, Albarrak, and Grassa (2020); Ullah (2020); Ibrahim and Ling (2016)) do not directly compare the presentation of the Islamic financial instruments by applying the financial reporting standards issued by AAOIFI and IASB on same instrument. This paper addresses this gap by comparing the qualitative characteristics of presented financial information for deferred payment Murabahah as guided by conventional and Islamic accounting standards by introducing an innovative approach for presentation (from the perspective of a credit sale). The paper also compares the accounting treatment of IFRSs with IFAS 1 (Pakistan), which has not yet been done.\nImplications:\nBased on the findings of the paper, it is recommended that, like Malaysia, the IFIs in Pakistan should adopt the IFRS framework. The focus of the regulatory bodies functioning in Pakistan should be to improve existing accounting standards through meaningful engagement with standard-setting bodies and take an active part in making IFRSs more compatible with the nature of Islamic financial transactions. An instrument-wise handbook should be published for the IFIs to help in the application of the IFRS framework, ensuring a Shariah-compliant presentation where alternative measuring and valuing approaches are allowed by the framework.","PeriodicalId":286621,"journal":{"name":"NICE Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for Murabahah – Reviewing the Need for Exclusive Accounting Standards\",\"authors\":\"O. Siddiqui, Muhammad Khaleequzzaman, M. S. Afzal\",\"doi\":\"10.51239/nrjss.vi.369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose:\\nThis paper examines the need for exclusive financial reporting standards for Islamic financial transactions by considering the accounting treatment of deferred payment Murabahah, as practiced in Pakistan. Being analogous to the conventional banking model, Murabahah is one of the most widely deployed modes in Islamic banks. The paper compares the quality of presentation of deferred payment Murabahah as practiced, following both conventional and Islamic accounting standards.\\nDesign:\\nThe paper presents the deferred payment Murabahah (credit sale) using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and Islamic Financial Accounting Standards (IFASs) and collects the opinion of experts (accountants, academicians, and Islamic bankers) on the extracts of the prepared financial statements. The opinions are centered on three qualitative characteristics of the financial information (relevance, faithful representation, and comparability) and a t-test is applied to examine the statistical significance of the difference of opinions received.\\nFindings:\\nThe results show that the overall quality score for IFRSs is higher than the IFASs for the selected qualitative characteristics. However, the difference observed is not significant, advocating the possibility of the harmonization among both Islamic and conventional accounting practices of the financial intuitions operating in Pakistan.\\nOriginality:\\nEarlier studies (Morshed (2022); El-Halaby, Albarrak, and Grassa (2020); Ullah (2020); Ibrahim and Ling (2016)) do not directly compare the presentation of the Islamic financial instruments by applying the financial reporting standards issued by AAOIFI and IASB on same instrument. This paper addresses this gap by comparing the qualitative characteristics of presented financial information for deferred payment Murabahah as guided by conventional and Islamic accounting standards by introducing an innovative approach for presentation (from the perspective of a credit sale). The paper also compares the accounting treatment of IFRSs with IFAS 1 (Pakistan), which has not yet been done.\\nImplications:\\nBased on the findings of the paper, it is recommended that, like Malaysia, the IFIs in Pakistan should adopt the IFRS framework. The focus of the regulatory bodies functioning in Pakistan should be to improve existing accounting standards through meaningful engagement with standard-setting bodies and take an active part in making IFRSs more compatible with the nature of Islamic financial transactions. An instrument-wise handbook should be published for the IFIs to help in the application of the IFRS framework, ensuring a Shariah-compliant presentation where alternative measuring and valuing approaches are allowed by the framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NICE Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NICE Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51239/nrjss.vi.369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NICE Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51239/nrjss.vi.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本文通过考虑巴基斯坦延期付款Murabahah的会计处理,考察了伊斯兰金融交易的独家财务报告标准的必要性。与传统银行模式类似,Murabahah是伊斯兰银行中应用最广泛的模式之一。本文比较了按照传统会计准则和伊斯兰会计准则实施的延期付款Murabahah的列报质量。设计:本文采用国际财务报告准则(ifrs)和伊斯兰财务会计准则(IFASs)介绍了延期付款Murabahah(信用销售),并收集了专家(会计师、学者和伊斯兰银行家)对编制的财务报表摘录的意见。这些意见集中在财务信息的三个定性特征(相关性、忠实代表性和可比性)上,并采用t检验来检验收到的意见差异的统计显著性。研究结果:结果表明,国际财务报告准则的总体质量得分高于国际财务报告准则所选择的质量特征。然而,观察到的差异并不显著,主张在巴基斯坦经营的金融机构的伊斯兰和传统会计做法之间进行协调的可能性。原创性:早期研究(Morshed, 2022);El-Halaby, Albarrak和Grassa (2020);Ullah (2020);Ibrahim和Ling(2016))没有通过将AAOIFI和IASB发布的财务报告准则应用于同一工具来直接比较伊斯兰金融工具的列报。本文通过引入一种创新的列报方法(从信用销售的角度),在传统会计准则和伊斯兰会计准则的指导下,通过比较递延付款Murabahah的财务信息的质量特征,解决了这一差距。本文还比较了国际财务报告准则与国际财务报告准则1(巴基斯坦)的会计处理,该准则尚未完成。启示:根据本文的研究结果,建议巴基斯坦的国际金融机构像马来西亚一样采用国际财务报告准则框架。在巴基斯坦运作的监管机构的重点应该是通过与标准制定机构进行有意义的接触来改进现有的会计标准,并积极参与使国际财务报告准则更符合伊斯兰金融交易的性质。应为国际金融机构发布工具手册,以帮助其应用国际财务报告准则框架,确保在框架允许采用替代计量和估值方法的情况下,采用符合伊斯兰教法的列报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accounting for Murabahah – Reviewing the Need for Exclusive Accounting Standards
Purpose: This paper examines the need for exclusive financial reporting standards for Islamic financial transactions by considering the accounting treatment of deferred payment Murabahah, as practiced in Pakistan. Being analogous to the conventional banking model, Murabahah is one of the most widely deployed modes in Islamic banks. The paper compares the quality of presentation of deferred payment Murabahah as practiced, following both conventional and Islamic accounting standards. Design: The paper presents the deferred payment Murabahah (credit sale) using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) and Islamic Financial Accounting Standards (IFASs) and collects the opinion of experts (accountants, academicians, and Islamic bankers) on the extracts of the prepared financial statements. The opinions are centered on three qualitative characteristics of the financial information (relevance, faithful representation, and comparability) and a t-test is applied to examine the statistical significance of the difference of opinions received. Findings: The results show that the overall quality score for IFRSs is higher than the IFASs for the selected qualitative characteristics. However, the difference observed is not significant, advocating the possibility of the harmonization among both Islamic and conventional accounting practices of the financial intuitions operating in Pakistan. Originality: Earlier studies (Morshed (2022); El-Halaby, Albarrak, and Grassa (2020); Ullah (2020); Ibrahim and Ling (2016)) do not directly compare the presentation of the Islamic financial instruments by applying the financial reporting standards issued by AAOIFI and IASB on same instrument. This paper addresses this gap by comparing the qualitative characteristics of presented financial information for deferred payment Murabahah as guided by conventional and Islamic accounting standards by introducing an innovative approach for presentation (from the perspective of a credit sale). The paper also compares the accounting treatment of IFRSs with IFAS 1 (Pakistan), which has not yet been done. Implications: Based on the findings of the paper, it is recommended that, like Malaysia, the IFIs in Pakistan should adopt the IFRS framework. The focus of the regulatory bodies functioning in Pakistan should be to improve existing accounting standards through meaningful engagement with standard-setting bodies and take an active part in making IFRSs more compatible with the nature of Islamic financial transactions. An instrument-wise handbook should be published for the IFIs to help in the application of the IFRS framework, ensuring a Shariah-compliant presentation where alternative measuring and valuing approaches are allowed by the framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信