州立法监督-一个案例研究:纽约州立法机构和大量水力压裂天然气

K. Dopp
{"title":"州立法监督-一个案例研究:纽约州立法机构和大量水力压裂天然气","authors":"K. Dopp","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1855323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New York’s position following other States’ development of fossil gas via high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) drilling, and the actions of its State Assembly and Senate Environmental Conservation (EnCon) Committees integrated the efforts and facilitated the communications of a wide network of stakeholder organizations and independent experts. These networking efforts were key factors explaining how New York State Legislature performed more effective oversight over agency HVHF well permitting processes than other states. In overseeing the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) HVHF permitting process, the legislature held committee investigations and hearings, reviewed agency regulations, made dozens of oversight recommendations to NYSDEC, and passed a temporary moratorium on issuing permits for hydraulic fracturing. Governor Paterson vetoed the moratorium because he felt it would deny new permits for low-volume hydraulic fracturing operations conforming to current requirements, and issued an executive order suspending “high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing,” thus potentially allowing vertical drilling HVHF. Vertical HVHF requires more well pads and vertical bores to produce the same amount of gas, potentially increasing risk of upwards migration of gas and carcinogenic and radioactive fluids into aquifers from well casing failures caused by high-pressure fracking. Will Patterson’s failure to suspend all HVHF create pressure on NYSDEC to issue vertical HVHF permits, or will NYSDEC continue revising its permitting processes in response to public input and legislative oversight requests? If NYSDEC continues its process, oil & gas companies are likely to be subject to more stringent requirements and to experience fewer financial pressures to employ risky drilling practices in New York than in other states thanks in large part to New York State’s effective legislative oversight.","PeriodicalId":388507,"journal":{"name":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Legislative Oversight - A Case Study: New York State Legislature and High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing of Natural Gas\",\"authors\":\"K. Dopp\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1855323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New York’s position following other States’ development of fossil gas via high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) drilling, and the actions of its State Assembly and Senate Environmental Conservation (EnCon) Committees integrated the efforts and facilitated the communications of a wide network of stakeholder organizations and independent experts. These networking efforts were key factors explaining how New York State Legislature performed more effective oversight over agency HVHF well permitting processes than other states. In overseeing the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) HVHF permitting process, the legislature held committee investigations and hearings, reviewed agency regulations, made dozens of oversight recommendations to NYSDEC, and passed a temporary moratorium on issuing permits for hydraulic fracturing. Governor Paterson vetoed the moratorium because he felt it would deny new permits for low-volume hydraulic fracturing operations conforming to current requirements, and issued an executive order suspending “high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing,” thus potentially allowing vertical drilling HVHF. Vertical HVHF requires more well pads and vertical bores to produce the same amount of gas, potentially increasing risk of upwards migration of gas and carcinogenic and radioactive fluids into aquifers from well casing failures caused by high-pressure fracking. Will Patterson’s failure to suspend all HVHF create pressure on NYSDEC to issue vertical HVHF permits, or will NYSDEC continue revising its permitting processes in response to public input and legislative oversight requests? If NYSDEC continues its process, oil & gas companies are likely to be subject to more stringent requirements and to experience fewer financial pressures to employ risky drilling practices in New York than in other states thanks in large part to New York State’s effective legislative oversight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1855323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1855323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

纽约州的立场紧随其他州通过大体积水力压裂(HVHF)钻井开发化石天然气的做法,其州议会和参议院环境保护(EnCon)委员会的行动整合了各方的努力,并促进了利益相关者组织和独立专家的广泛网络的沟通。这些网络工作是解释纽约州立法机构如何比其他州更有效地监督机构HVHF许可程序的关键因素。在监督纽约州环境保护部(NYSDEC)的HVHF许可过程中,立法机构举行了委员会调查和听证会,审查了机构法规,向NYSDEC提出了数十项监督建议,并通过了一项临时暂停发放水力压裂许可的规定。Paterson州长否决了这一禁令,因为他认为这将否决符合当前要求的小容量水力压裂作业的新许可,并发布了一项暂停“大容量水平水力压裂”的行政命令,从而可能允许垂直钻探HVHF。垂直HVHF需要更多的井台和垂直井来生产相同数量的天然气,这潜在地增加了高压压裂导致的套管损坏导致的天然气向上运移、致癌和放射性流体进入含水层的风险。帕特森未能暂停所有HVHF是否会给NYSDEC颁发垂直HVHF许可证带来压力,或者NYSDEC是否会根据公众意见和立法监督要求继续修改其许可流程?如果NYSDEC继续其进程,石油和天然气公司可能会受到更严格的要求,并且在很大程度上由于纽约州有效的立法监督,在纽约采用风险钻井作业的财务压力会比在其他州要小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Legislative Oversight - A Case Study: New York State Legislature and High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing of Natural Gas
New York’s position following other States’ development of fossil gas via high-volume hydraulic fracturing (HVHF) drilling, and the actions of its State Assembly and Senate Environmental Conservation (EnCon) Committees integrated the efforts and facilitated the communications of a wide network of stakeholder organizations and independent experts. These networking efforts were key factors explaining how New York State Legislature performed more effective oversight over agency HVHF well permitting processes than other states. In overseeing the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) HVHF permitting process, the legislature held committee investigations and hearings, reviewed agency regulations, made dozens of oversight recommendations to NYSDEC, and passed a temporary moratorium on issuing permits for hydraulic fracturing. Governor Paterson vetoed the moratorium because he felt it would deny new permits for low-volume hydraulic fracturing operations conforming to current requirements, and issued an executive order suspending “high-volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing,” thus potentially allowing vertical drilling HVHF. Vertical HVHF requires more well pads and vertical bores to produce the same amount of gas, potentially increasing risk of upwards migration of gas and carcinogenic and radioactive fluids into aquifers from well casing failures caused by high-pressure fracking. Will Patterson’s failure to suspend all HVHF create pressure on NYSDEC to issue vertical HVHF permits, or will NYSDEC continue revising its permitting processes in response to public input and legislative oversight requests? If NYSDEC continues its process, oil & gas companies are likely to be subject to more stringent requirements and to experience fewer financial pressures to employ risky drilling practices in New York than in other states thanks in large part to New York State’s effective legislative oversight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信