生产系统中缺陷产品和退货产品的确定:在某纺织企业中的应用

Ezgi Demir, S. E. Dinçer
{"title":"生产系统中缺陷产品和退货产品的确定:在某纺织企业中的应用","authors":"Ezgi Demir, S. E. Dinçer","doi":"10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2020.1281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose- In this study, it is aimed to improve the production and quality control processes of a company operating in the textile industry. For this purpose predicting faulty and refund products by using simulation of oversampling and undersampling applications. Methodology– In this study, there are 250 different variables and 72959 lines of data on the production line. These data have been taken from the last 1-year data of the firm. In this study, simulation has been done. New machine learning methods have been used by simulating. The reason for the simulation is that it was easy to detect the refund and faulty conditions made in a large lot group production in previous studies. However, the aim is to investigate whether the accuracy of the prediction algorithms will yield consistent results in terms of the increase in the number of refund and faulty products when production is made in a larger structure. In the simulation method, \"oversampling\" and \"undersampling\" methods have been used. While making simulation prediction, in the literature, boosting algorithms, which are used as ensemble machine learning techniques, have been used. In this study, simulation has been done as follows, while the number of production lots increased, refund and faulty products were increased within the same application. The reason for doing this is to investigate whether the prediction status in normal machine learning algorithms can be captured in a larger data stack. This process is called oversampling. Then, the \"undersampling\" method was applied. According to the “undersampling” method, it is aimed to determine the refund and defect situations in a smaller lot by taking samples of refund and defective products with less frequency. At the end of the study, the results were interpreted by applying boosting algorithms. Findings- As a result of the study, it is concluded that \"undersampling\" and \"oversampling\" simulations predict better than usual machine learning methodology. Conclusion- In this study, it has been observed that the ensemble machine learning algorithms (adaboost, xgboost, gradient boosting algorithms), which are one of the ensemble machine learning methods that emerged in 2016, were applied to the production data for the first time and showed success in the prediction of faulty and refund products.","PeriodicalId":376357,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Business Management","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the faulty and refund products in manufacturing system: application on a textile Firm\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Demir, S. E. Dinçer\",\"doi\":\"10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2020.1281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose- In this study, it is aimed to improve the production and quality control processes of a company operating in the textile industry. For this purpose predicting faulty and refund products by using simulation of oversampling and undersampling applications. Methodology– In this study, there are 250 different variables and 72959 lines of data on the production line. These data have been taken from the last 1-year data of the firm. In this study, simulation has been done. New machine learning methods have been used by simulating. The reason for the simulation is that it was easy to detect the refund and faulty conditions made in a large lot group production in previous studies. However, the aim is to investigate whether the accuracy of the prediction algorithms will yield consistent results in terms of the increase in the number of refund and faulty products when production is made in a larger structure. In the simulation method, \\\"oversampling\\\" and \\\"undersampling\\\" methods have been used. While making simulation prediction, in the literature, boosting algorithms, which are used as ensemble machine learning techniques, have been used. In this study, simulation has been done as follows, while the number of production lots increased, refund and faulty products were increased within the same application. The reason for doing this is to investigate whether the prediction status in normal machine learning algorithms can be captured in a larger data stack. This process is called oversampling. Then, the \\\"undersampling\\\" method was applied. According to the “undersampling” method, it is aimed to determine the refund and defect situations in a smaller lot by taking samples of refund and defective products with less frequency. At the end of the study, the results were interpreted by applying boosting algorithms. Findings- As a result of the study, it is concluded that \\\"undersampling\\\" and \\\"oversampling\\\" simulations predict better than usual machine learning methodology. Conclusion- In this study, it has been observed that the ensemble machine learning algorithms (adaboost, xgboost, gradient boosting algorithms), which are one of the ensemble machine learning methods that emerged in 2016, were applied to the production data for the first time and showed success in the prediction of faulty and refund products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Journal of Business Management\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Journal of Business Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2020.1281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2020.1281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的-在本研究中,旨在改善一家纺织行业公司的生产和质量控制过程。为此目的,通过模拟过采样和欠采样应用来预测故障和退款产品。方法-在本研究中,有250个不同的变量和72959条生产线上的数据。这些数据取自该公司最近一年的数据。在本研究中,进行了仿真。新的机器学习方法通过模拟得到应用。之所以进行仿真,是因为以往的研究很容易检测到大批量成批生产中出现的退货和故障情况。然而,我们的目的是调查预测算法的准确性是否会在更大的结构中生产时,在退款和故障产品数量的增加方面产生一致的结果。在仿真方法中,采用了过采样和欠采样两种方法。在进行模拟预测时,在文献中,已经使用了作为集成机器学习技术的增强算法。在本研究中,在同一应用程序中,随着生产批数的增加,退款和不良产品的增加,模拟如下。这样做的原因是为了研究是否可以在更大的数据堆栈中捕获正常机器学习算法中的预测状态。这个过程被称为过采样。然后,采用“欠采样”方法。“欠采样”法的目的是在较小的批次内,以较少的频率对退货产品和次品进行取样,以确定退货和次品的情况。在研究结束时,通过应用增强算法对结果进行解释。研究结果-研究的结果是,“欠采样”和“过采样”模拟比通常的机器学习方法预测得更好。在本研究中,我们观察到2016年出现的集成机器学习方法之一的集成机器学习算法(adaboost、xgboost、梯度提升算法)首次应用于生产数据,并成功预测了故障产品和退货产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining the faulty and refund products in manufacturing system: application on a textile Firm
Purpose- In this study, it is aimed to improve the production and quality control processes of a company operating in the textile industry. For this purpose predicting faulty and refund products by using simulation of oversampling and undersampling applications. Methodology– In this study, there are 250 different variables and 72959 lines of data on the production line. These data have been taken from the last 1-year data of the firm. In this study, simulation has been done. New machine learning methods have been used by simulating. The reason for the simulation is that it was easy to detect the refund and faulty conditions made in a large lot group production in previous studies. However, the aim is to investigate whether the accuracy of the prediction algorithms will yield consistent results in terms of the increase in the number of refund and faulty products when production is made in a larger structure. In the simulation method, "oversampling" and "undersampling" methods have been used. While making simulation prediction, in the literature, boosting algorithms, which are used as ensemble machine learning techniques, have been used. In this study, simulation has been done as follows, while the number of production lots increased, refund and faulty products were increased within the same application. The reason for doing this is to investigate whether the prediction status in normal machine learning algorithms can be captured in a larger data stack. This process is called oversampling. Then, the "undersampling" method was applied. According to the “undersampling” method, it is aimed to determine the refund and defect situations in a smaller lot by taking samples of refund and defective products with less frequency. At the end of the study, the results were interpreted by applying boosting algorithms. Findings- As a result of the study, it is concluded that "undersampling" and "oversampling" simulations predict better than usual machine learning methodology. Conclusion- In this study, it has been observed that the ensemble machine learning algorithms (adaboost, xgboost, gradient boosting algorithms), which are one of the ensemble machine learning methods that emerged in 2016, were applied to the production data for the first time and showed success in the prediction of faulty and refund products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信