基于规则模式分析的控制流检测优化

Zhiqi Zhu, Joseph Callenes-Sloan, Benjamin Carrión Schäfer
{"title":"基于规则模式分析的控制流检测优化","authors":"Zhiqi Zhu, Joseph Callenes-Sloan, Benjamin Carrión Schäfer","doi":"10.1109/PRDC.2018.00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the continuous sub-micron process scaling, reliability of integrated circuits has quickly become a first-order design concern. In modern computing systems, transient errors are increasingly likely to corrupt the computation by altering the control flow or sequencing of instructions, leading to catastrophic failures. Prior work on control flow checking provides good coverage but at a high cost. In this paper, by exploring regular control flow patterns found in most applications, we propose the optimization schemes for software signature control flow checking that could reduce the error detection overheads. Specifically, we leverage the fact that most applications have: (1) simple fan-in / fan-out control flow patterns, and (2) most of control flows can be predicted during the compilation stage through static branch prediction heuristics. By exploiting these opportunities, we propose two techniques to reduce the number of inserted codes at common paths and simplify control flow checking of irregular patterns with minimal overheads. Experimental results on a variety of applications demonstrate that our approaches could reduce checking overhead by almost 2.5x on average while leading to similar fault coverage compared to traditional control flow checking.","PeriodicalId":409301,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 23rd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control Flow Checking Optimization Based on Regular Patterns Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqi Zhu, Joseph Callenes-Sloan, Benjamin Carrión Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRDC.2018.00036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the continuous sub-micron process scaling, reliability of integrated circuits has quickly become a first-order design concern. In modern computing systems, transient errors are increasingly likely to corrupt the computation by altering the control flow or sequencing of instructions, leading to catastrophic failures. Prior work on control flow checking provides good coverage but at a high cost. In this paper, by exploring regular control flow patterns found in most applications, we propose the optimization schemes for software signature control flow checking that could reduce the error detection overheads. Specifically, we leverage the fact that most applications have: (1) simple fan-in / fan-out control flow patterns, and (2) most of control flows can be predicted during the compilation stage through static branch prediction heuristics. By exploiting these opportunities, we propose two techniques to reduce the number of inserted codes at common paths and simplify control flow checking of irregular patterns with minimal overheads. Experimental results on a variety of applications demonstrate that our approaches could reduce checking overhead by almost 2.5x on average while leading to similar fault coverage compared to traditional control flow checking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 23rd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 23rd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRDC.2018.00036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 23rd Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRDC.2018.00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着亚微米制程的不断缩小,集成电路的可靠性已迅速成为一级设计关注的问题。在现代计算系统中,瞬态错误越来越有可能通过改变控制流或指令顺序来破坏计算,从而导致灾难性故障。先前对控制流检查的工作提供了良好的覆盖,但成本很高。在本文中,我们通过探索在大多数应用中发现的规则控制流模式,提出了可以减少错误检测开销的软件签名控制流检查的优化方案。具体来说,我们利用了大多数应用程序具有以下事实:(1)简单的扇入/扇出控制流模式;(2)大多数控制流可以在编译阶段通过静态分支预测启发式预测。通过利用这些机会,我们提出了两种技术来减少在公共路径上插入代码的数量,并以最小的开销简化不规则模式的控制流检查。各种应用的实验结果表明,与传统的控制流检查相比,我们的方法可以将检查开销平均减少近2.5倍,同时导致相似的故障覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control Flow Checking Optimization Based on Regular Patterns Analysis
With the continuous sub-micron process scaling, reliability of integrated circuits has quickly become a first-order design concern. In modern computing systems, transient errors are increasingly likely to corrupt the computation by altering the control flow or sequencing of instructions, leading to catastrophic failures. Prior work on control flow checking provides good coverage but at a high cost. In this paper, by exploring regular control flow patterns found in most applications, we propose the optimization schemes for software signature control flow checking that could reduce the error detection overheads. Specifically, we leverage the fact that most applications have: (1) simple fan-in / fan-out control flow patterns, and (2) most of control flows can be predicted during the compilation stage through static branch prediction heuristics. By exploiting these opportunities, we propose two techniques to reduce the number of inserted codes at common paths and simplify control flow checking of irregular patterns with minimal overheads. Experimental results on a variety of applications demonstrate that our approaches could reduce checking overhead by almost 2.5x on average while leading to similar fault coverage compared to traditional control flow checking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信