阿姆斯特丹市立博物馆125周年纪念-社论

Yvette Mutumba, Maurice Rummens
{"title":"阿姆斯特丹市立博物馆125周年纪念-社论","authors":"Yvette Mutumba, Maurice Rummens","doi":"10.54533/stedstud.vol011.art01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Museums are processes,” suggested the Brazilian ICOM delegation as part of their proposal for a new museum definition in 2019.[1] This might sound to some like the complete opposite of what, at least in Europe, museums seemingly represent: preservation and permanence. However, processes, in the sense of changes and shifts, have to increasingly define the dynamics of museums in the twenty-first century. The debate around the “new museum” or the “museum of the future” is not a phenomenon of this century, as Nora Sternfeld points out, but rather has again become a major concern.[2] Sternfeld quotes Alfred Lichtwark, who in 1904 argued “Solange die Museen nicht versteinern, werden sie sich wandeln müssen. (As long as museums do not petrify, they will have to change.)”[3] Lichtwark’s statement came at the height of European colonialism. Today “Western”[4] museums cannot plan their future without acknowledging their history of legitimizing racist and colonial violence.","PeriodicalId":143043,"journal":{"name":"Stedelijk Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam at 125 Years – Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Yvette Mutumba, Maurice Rummens\",\"doi\":\"10.54533/stedstud.vol011.art01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Museums are processes,” suggested the Brazilian ICOM delegation as part of their proposal for a new museum definition in 2019.[1] This might sound to some like the complete opposite of what, at least in Europe, museums seemingly represent: preservation and permanence. However, processes, in the sense of changes and shifts, have to increasingly define the dynamics of museums in the twenty-first century. The debate around the “new museum” or the “museum of the future” is not a phenomenon of this century, as Nora Sternfeld points out, but rather has again become a major concern.[2] Sternfeld quotes Alfred Lichtwark, who in 1904 argued “Solange die Museen nicht versteinern, werden sie sich wandeln müssen. (As long as museums do not petrify, they will have to change.)”[3] Lichtwark’s statement came at the height of European colonialism. Today “Western”[4] museums cannot plan their future without acknowledging their history of legitimizing racist and colonial violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stedelijk Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stedelijk Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54533/stedstud.vol011.art01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stedelijk Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54533/stedstud.vol011.art01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“博物馆是一个过程,”巴西国际博协代表团在2019年提出的新博物馆定义提案中提出。[1]对某些人来说,这听起来可能与博物馆所代表的东西完全相反,至少在欧洲,博物馆似乎代表着:保存和永久。然而,在变化和转变的意义上,进程必须越来越多地定义21世纪博物馆的动态。正如诺拉·斯特恩菲尔德所指出的那样,围绕“新博物馆”或“未来博物馆”的争论不是本世纪的现象,而是再次成为一个主要问题。[2]斯特恩菲尔德引用了阿尔弗雷德·利希特瓦克(Alfred Lichtwark)在1904年提出的观点:“博物馆之夜,是博物馆之夜,是博物馆之夜,是博物馆之夜。”(只要博物馆不僵化,它们就必须改变。)”[3]Lichtwark的声明是在欧洲殖民主义达到顶峰时发表的。今天,“西方”[4]博物馆如果不承认自己为种族主义和殖民暴力合法化的历史,就无法规划自己的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam at 125 Years – Editorial
“Museums are processes,” suggested the Brazilian ICOM delegation as part of their proposal for a new museum definition in 2019.[1] This might sound to some like the complete opposite of what, at least in Europe, museums seemingly represent: preservation and permanence. However, processes, in the sense of changes and shifts, have to increasingly define the dynamics of museums in the twenty-first century. The debate around the “new museum” or the “museum of the future” is not a phenomenon of this century, as Nora Sternfeld points out, but rather has again become a major concern.[2] Sternfeld quotes Alfred Lichtwark, who in 1904 argued “Solange die Museen nicht versteinern, werden sie sich wandeln müssen. (As long as museums do not petrify, they will have to change.)”[3] Lichtwark’s statement came at the height of European colonialism. Today “Western”[4] museums cannot plan their future without acknowledging their history of legitimizing racist and colonial violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信