亚15nm纳米压印模板制造的自对准双图型工艺

Photomask Japan Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI:10.1117/12.2603907
Yoshinori Kagawa, M. Suenaga, H. Sasaki, Koji Murano, S. Magoshi, Ryu Komatsu, K. Takai, M. Kondo, H. Sakurai, S. Kanamitsu
{"title":"亚15nm纳米压印模板制造的自对准双图型工艺","authors":"Yoshinori Kagawa, M. Suenaga, H. Sasaki, Koji Murano, S. Magoshi, Ryu Komatsu, K. Takai, M. Kondo, H. Sakurai, S. Kanamitsu","doi":"10.1117/12.2603907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nanoimprint lithography (NIL) is a promising technology on next generation lithography for the fabrication of semiconductor devices. NIL is a one-to-one lithographic technology with a contact transfer methodology using templates. Therefore, critical dimension (CD) error and defect performance of templates has direct impact on wafer performance. The previous paper reported that the self-aligned double patterning (SADP) process on master template had better performance on resolution and defect performance [2]. In proceeding with development of SADP template process technology, we found that CD errors occurred in the area with a pattern density change. CD control over any pattern density is one of the critical issues. In this report, we have investigated the impact of the proximity effect correction (PEC) and fogging effect correction (FEC) parameters for electron beam writing on gap space and core space. It was found that the optimal PEC parameter for resist CD is not the best for the core space and the gap space. The resist CD is uniform, but there is a difference in resist shape on the local pattern density variation. It was also found that the core space had dependency on global pattern density even if the optimal FEC parameter for resist CD was applied. FEC can correct resist CD, but it cannot adjust resist shape. By using the optimal PEC and FEC parameters for SADP process, the gap space range of 0.6 nm and the core space range of 0.5 nm were successfully obtained.","PeriodicalId":138407,"journal":{"name":"Photomask Japan","volume":"11908 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-aligned double patterning process for sub-15nm nanoimprint template fabrication\",\"authors\":\"Yoshinori Kagawa, M. Suenaga, H. Sasaki, Koji Murano, S. Magoshi, Ryu Komatsu, K. Takai, M. Kondo, H. Sakurai, S. Kanamitsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2603907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nanoimprint lithography (NIL) is a promising technology on next generation lithography for the fabrication of semiconductor devices. NIL is a one-to-one lithographic technology with a contact transfer methodology using templates. Therefore, critical dimension (CD) error and defect performance of templates has direct impact on wafer performance. The previous paper reported that the self-aligned double patterning (SADP) process on master template had better performance on resolution and defect performance [2]. In proceeding with development of SADP template process technology, we found that CD errors occurred in the area with a pattern density change. CD control over any pattern density is one of the critical issues. In this report, we have investigated the impact of the proximity effect correction (PEC) and fogging effect correction (FEC) parameters for electron beam writing on gap space and core space. It was found that the optimal PEC parameter for resist CD is not the best for the core space and the gap space. The resist CD is uniform, but there is a difference in resist shape on the local pattern density variation. It was also found that the core space had dependency on global pattern density even if the optimal FEC parameter for resist CD was applied. FEC can correct resist CD, but it cannot adjust resist shape. By using the optimal PEC and FEC parameters for SADP process, the gap space range of 0.6 nm and the core space range of 0.5 nm were successfully obtained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photomask Japan\",\"volume\":\"11908 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photomask Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2603907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photomask Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2603907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳米压印光刻技术是下一代半导体器件光刻技术的发展方向。NIL是一种一对一的光刻技术,使用模板进行接触转移。因此,模板的临界尺寸误差和缺陷性能直接影响到晶圆的性能。前人报道了主模板上的自对齐双图案化(SADP)工艺在分辨率和缺陷性能方面都有较好的表现。随着SADP模板加工技术的发展,我们发现在图案密度变化的区域会出现CD误差。任意模式密度的CD控制都是关键问题之一。本文研究了电子束写入过程中邻近效应校正(PEC)和雾化效应校正(FEC)参数对电子束写入间隙和磁芯空间的影响。研究发现,抗蚀CD的最佳PEC参数在芯区和间隙区都不是最佳的。抗蚀剂CD是均匀的,但抗蚀剂形状在局部图案密度变化上存在差异。同时发现,即使采用抗蚀CD的最优FEC参数,核心空间也依赖于全局模式密度。FEC可以校正电阻CD,但不能调整电阻形状。采用最优的PEC和FEC工艺参数,成功地获得了0.6 nm的间隙范围和0.5 nm的芯间距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-aligned double patterning process for sub-15nm nanoimprint template fabrication
Nanoimprint lithography (NIL) is a promising technology on next generation lithography for the fabrication of semiconductor devices. NIL is a one-to-one lithographic technology with a contact transfer methodology using templates. Therefore, critical dimension (CD) error and defect performance of templates has direct impact on wafer performance. The previous paper reported that the self-aligned double patterning (SADP) process on master template had better performance on resolution and defect performance [2]. In proceeding with development of SADP template process technology, we found that CD errors occurred in the area with a pattern density change. CD control over any pattern density is one of the critical issues. In this report, we have investigated the impact of the proximity effect correction (PEC) and fogging effect correction (FEC) parameters for electron beam writing on gap space and core space. It was found that the optimal PEC parameter for resist CD is not the best for the core space and the gap space. The resist CD is uniform, but there is a difference in resist shape on the local pattern density variation. It was also found that the core space had dependency on global pattern density even if the optimal FEC parameter for resist CD was applied. FEC can correct resist CD, but it cannot adjust resist shape. By using the optimal PEC and FEC parameters for SADP process, the gap space range of 0.6 nm and the core space range of 0.5 nm were successfully obtained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信