Markus Floris Christensen
{"title":"Angst som eksistentiale i Inger Christensens det","authors":"Markus Floris Christensen","doi":"10.7146/pas.v36i86.130766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis article offers a systematic reading of the representation of anxiety in Inger Christensen’s it (1969) by chronologically mapping the development of the theme across the work’s three main sections, Prologos, Logos and Epilogos. Moreover, this article posits a new approach to the material, arguing that, rather than Søren Kierkegaard’s theological-psychological framework, Martin Heidegger’s fundamental ontological concept of anxiety may positively shed light on Christensen’s thematization of anxiety in the work. It is one of the aims of the article to show that Heidegger’s concept of anxiety can advantageously expand the understanding of Christensen’s representation of anxiety, as Heidegger’s confrontation with metaphysics, his In-Frage-stellen of the forgetfulness of Being, seems particularly compatible with Christensen’s poetics of systemic modernism. I examine how anxiety manifests itself in the architecture of the work, and I argue that Heidegger’s fundamental ontological interpretation of the concept may highlight some central features of the representation of anxiety that Kierkegaard’s theory of anxiety does not seem to capture. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":360035,"journal":{"name":"Passage - Tidsskrift for litteratur og kritik","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passage - Tidsskrift for litteratur og kritik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/pas.v36i86.130766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对英格·克里斯滕森(Inger Christensen)的《it》(1969)中焦虑的表现进行了系统的解读,通过按时间顺序绘制了作品三个主要部分(Prologos, Logos和Epilogos)主题的发展。此外,本文对材料提出了一种新的方法,认为马丁·海德格尔关于焦虑的基本本体论概念,而不是Søren Kierkegaard的神学-心理学框架,可能对克里斯滕森在作品中对焦虑的主题化有积极的启示。本文的目的之一是表明海德格尔的焦虑概念可以有利地扩展对克里斯滕森焦虑表现的理解,因为海德格尔与形而上学的对抗,他对存在的遗忘的in - frage - steellen,似乎与克里斯滕森的系统现代主义诗学特别兼容。我研究了焦虑如何在作品的架构中表现出来,我认为海德格尔对这个概念的基本本体论解释可能会突出焦虑表征的一些核心特征,而克尔凯郭尔的焦虑理论似乎没有捕捉到这些特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Angst som eksistentiale i Inger Christensens det
This article offers a systematic reading of the representation of anxiety in Inger Christensen’s it (1969) by chronologically mapping the development of the theme across the work’s three main sections, Prologos, Logos and Epilogos. Moreover, this article posits a new approach to the material, arguing that, rather than Søren Kierkegaard’s theological-psychological framework, Martin Heidegger’s fundamental ontological concept of anxiety may positively shed light on Christensen’s thematization of anxiety in the work. It is one of the aims of the article to show that Heidegger’s concept of anxiety can advantageously expand the understanding of Christensen’s representation of anxiety, as Heidegger’s confrontation with metaphysics, his In-Frage-stellen of the forgetfulness of Being, seems particularly compatible with Christensen’s poetics of systemic modernism. I examine how anxiety manifests itself in the architecture of the work, and I argue that Heidegger’s fundamental ontological interpretation of the concept may highlight some central features of the representation of anxiety that Kierkegaard’s theory of anxiety does not seem to capture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信