初级玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗作为单一疗法与联合玻璃体内贝伐单抗与氩激光光凝治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的比较研究

Y. Alahmadawy, R. Eltanamly, M. Khattab, Mosatafa Hamed Nabih
{"title":"初级玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗作为单一疗法与联合玻璃体内贝伐单抗与氩激光光凝治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的比较研究","authors":"Y. Alahmadawy, R. Eltanamly, M. Khattab, Mosatafa Hamed Nabih","doi":"10.4103/2347-5617.179349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of bevacizumab versus bevacizumab with macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. Patients and Methods: Forty eyes of 31 patients with macular edema were enrolled in this study; Group A, twenty eyes received baseline three monthly injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml), then monthly reinjection according to pro re nata (PRN) regimen, and Group B, twenty eyes received one injection plus laser 1 month later, then monthly injections according to PRN regimen (? according to PRN also). Results: In Group A, no significant change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) throughout 1 year (P = 0.165), as compared to Group B (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA in Group B at 12 months was 0.46 ± 0.30 compared with 0.75 ± 0.33 in Group A (P = 0.041).The mean number of injections in Group A was 5.55 times while in Group B was 1.4 times (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Combined treatment resulted in marked reduction of the number of injections required to control edema.","PeriodicalId":201997,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Retina Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary intravitreal bevacizumab injection as a monotherapy versus combined intravitreal bevacizumab with argon laser photocoagulation in management of diabetic macular edema: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Y. Alahmadawy, R. Eltanamly, M. Khattab, Mosatafa Hamed Nabih\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2347-5617.179349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of bevacizumab versus bevacizumab with macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. Patients and Methods: Forty eyes of 31 patients with macular edema were enrolled in this study; Group A, twenty eyes received baseline three monthly injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml), then monthly reinjection according to pro re nata (PRN) regimen, and Group B, twenty eyes received one injection plus laser 1 month later, then monthly injections according to PRN regimen (? according to PRN also). Results: In Group A, no significant change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) throughout 1 year (P = 0.165), as compared to Group B (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA in Group B at 12 months was 0.46 ± 0.30 compared with 0.75 ± 0.33 in Group A (P = 0.041).The mean number of injections in Group A was 5.55 times while in Group B was 1.4 times (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Combined treatment resulted in marked reduction of the number of injections required to control edema.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Retina Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Retina Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-5617.179349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Retina Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-5617.179349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价贝伐单抗与贝伐单抗联合黄斑激光光凝治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效。患者与方法:选取31例黄斑水肿患者40只眼;A组20只眼基线3次/月注射贝伐单抗(1.25 mg/0.05 ml),然后按PRN方案每月再注射;B组20只眼1个月后接受1次注射加激光,然后按PRN方案每月注射(?根据PRN也)。结果:A组1年内平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)与B组相比无显著变化(P = 0.165) (P < 0.001)。B组12个月平均BCVA为0.46±0.30,A组为0.75±0.33 (P = 0.041)。A组平均注射次数为5.55次,B组为1.4次(P < 0.001)。结论:综合治疗可显著减少水肿控制所需的注射次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary intravitreal bevacizumab injection as a monotherapy versus combined intravitreal bevacizumab with argon laser photocoagulation in management of diabetic macular edema: A comparative study
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of bevacizumab versus bevacizumab with macular laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema. Patients and Methods: Forty eyes of 31 patients with macular edema were enrolled in this study; Group A, twenty eyes received baseline three monthly injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml), then monthly reinjection according to pro re nata (PRN) regimen, and Group B, twenty eyes received one injection plus laser 1 month later, then monthly injections according to PRN regimen (? according to PRN also). Results: In Group A, no significant change in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) throughout 1 year (P = 0.165), as compared to Group B (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA in Group B at 12 months was 0.46 ± 0.30 compared with 0.75 ± 0.33 in Group A (P = 0.041).The mean number of injections in Group A was 5.55 times while in Group B was 1.4 times (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Combined treatment resulted in marked reduction of the number of injections required to control edema.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信