可持续投资实践:简化复杂性

R. Urwin
{"title":"可持续投资实践:简化复杂性","authors":"R. Urwin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1656988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The model of “sustainable investing” presented in this paper is of long-term investing that is inter-generationally efficient. This model combines the opportunities in the traditional areas of institutional decisions – asset allocation and manager line-up – with the newer fields of extra-financial factors including ESG (environment, social and governance) and active ownership. The development of this model relies heavily on complexity theory in which a system has the properties of: being dynamic and often away from equilibrium; is characterised by agent behaviours; behaves interactively including network effects; produces the emergence of macro patterns from micro-level behaviours; and evolves its characteristics from survival and growth factors. We conclude there are significant investment opportunities for those that focus their attention on “sustainable investing” which can be seen to comprise three broad areas: the asset allocation and manager areas where large costs are incurred as a result of poor sustainability practices; the ESG area when an integrated approach is desirable; and the sustainability mandates area where more sophisticated beliefs are necessary. We see a particular opportunity for sustainable mandates. These will require asset allocation disciplines and we put forward a process for determining appropriate figures in this regard. We include a process by which funds that have dual missions can make such an allocation. We see retirement and economic sustainability as critically positioned at tipping points in their development; developed world aging and shrinking workforce are leading to big increases in the dependency ratio – raising issues about sustainable retirement; while at the same time population growth and development are challenging the carrying capacity limits of the planet – raising issues about sustainable development. Sustainable investing provides a link between these two issues and presents a win-win: more sustainable investing returns produce both better retirement outcomes and environmental outcomes. Institutional investment funds need to raise their game and play a part in these challenges by employing integrated and/or targeted sustainable investing. Those funds will be able to do so only if they strengthen their governance.","PeriodicalId":227461,"journal":{"name":"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series","volume":"16 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable Investing Practice: Simplified Complexity\",\"authors\":\"R. Urwin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1656988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The model of “sustainable investing” presented in this paper is of long-term investing that is inter-generationally efficient. This model combines the opportunities in the traditional areas of institutional decisions – asset allocation and manager line-up – with the newer fields of extra-financial factors including ESG (environment, social and governance) and active ownership. The development of this model relies heavily on complexity theory in which a system has the properties of: being dynamic and often away from equilibrium; is characterised by agent behaviours; behaves interactively including network effects; produces the emergence of macro patterns from micro-level behaviours; and evolves its characteristics from survival and growth factors. We conclude there are significant investment opportunities for those that focus their attention on “sustainable investing” which can be seen to comprise three broad areas: the asset allocation and manager areas where large costs are incurred as a result of poor sustainability practices; the ESG area when an integrated approach is desirable; and the sustainability mandates area where more sophisticated beliefs are necessary. We see a particular opportunity for sustainable mandates. These will require asset allocation disciplines and we put forward a process for determining appropriate figures in this regard. We include a process by which funds that have dual missions can make such an allocation. We see retirement and economic sustainability as critically positioned at tipping points in their development; developed world aging and shrinking workforce are leading to big increases in the dependency ratio – raising issues about sustainable retirement; while at the same time population growth and development are challenging the carrying capacity limits of the planet – raising issues about sustainable development. Sustainable investing provides a link between these two issues and presents a win-win: more sustainable investing returns produce both better retirement outcomes and environmental outcomes. Institutional investment funds need to raise their game and play a part in these challenges by employing integrated and/or targeted sustainable investing. Those funds will be able to do so only if they strengthen their governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"16 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出的“可持续投资”模式是一种代际高效的长期投资模式。这种模式将传统的机构决策领域(资产配置和经理人阵容)的机会,与ESG(环境、社会和治理)和主动所有权等非财务因素的新领域结合起来。该模型的发展在很大程度上依赖于复杂性理论,在复杂性理论中,系统具有以下特性:动态且经常远离平衡;以代理行为为特征;交互性行为,包括网络效应;从微观层面的行为产生宏观模式的出现;并从生存因子和生长因子演化出其特征。我们得出的结论是,对于那些将注意力集中在“可持续投资”上的人来说,存在重大的投资机会,这可以被视为包括三个广泛的领域:资产配置和管理领域,由于糟糕的可持续性实践而产生了巨大的成本;需要采用综合方法的ESG领域;而在可持续发展领域需要更复杂的信念。我们看到了可持续授权的特别机会。这将需要资产配置纪律,我们提出了在这方面确定适当数字的程序。我们包括一个程序,通过这个程序,具有双重使命的基金可以进行这种分配。我们认为退休和经济可持续性处于发展的关键转折点;发达国家的老龄化和劳动力萎缩导致抚养比率大幅上升,引发了有关可持续退休的问题;与此同时,人口增长和发展正在挑战地球的承载能力极限-提出了有关可持续发展的问题。可持续投资在这两个问题之间建立了联系,并带来了双赢:更可持续的投资回报既能带来更好的退休结果,也能带来更好的环境结果。机构投资基金需要通过采用综合和/或有针对性的可持续投资来提高自己的水平,并在这些挑战中发挥作用。这些基金只有在加强治理的情况下才能做到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable Investing Practice: Simplified Complexity
The model of “sustainable investing” presented in this paper is of long-term investing that is inter-generationally efficient. This model combines the opportunities in the traditional areas of institutional decisions – asset allocation and manager line-up – with the newer fields of extra-financial factors including ESG (environment, social and governance) and active ownership. The development of this model relies heavily on complexity theory in which a system has the properties of: being dynamic and often away from equilibrium; is characterised by agent behaviours; behaves interactively including network effects; produces the emergence of macro patterns from micro-level behaviours; and evolves its characteristics from survival and growth factors. We conclude there are significant investment opportunities for those that focus their attention on “sustainable investing” which can be seen to comprise three broad areas: the asset allocation and manager areas where large costs are incurred as a result of poor sustainability practices; the ESG area when an integrated approach is desirable; and the sustainability mandates area where more sophisticated beliefs are necessary. We see a particular opportunity for sustainable mandates. These will require asset allocation disciplines and we put forward a process for determining appropriate figures in this regard. We include a process by which funds that have dual missions can make such an allocation. We see retirement and economic sustainability as critically positioned at tipping points in their development; developed world aging and shrinking workforce are leading to big increases in the dependency ratio – raising issues about sustainable retirement; while at the same time population growth and development are challenging the carrying capacity limits of the planet – raising issues about sustainable development. Sustainable investing provides a link between these two issues and presents a win-win: more sustainable investing returns produce both better retirement outcomes and environmental outcomes. Institutional investment funds need to raise their game and play a part in these challenges by employing integrated and/or targeted sustainable investing. Those funds will be able to do so only if they strengthen their governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信