裸露手指或刚性探针接触表面时的力变化

S. Lederman, R. Howe, R. Klatzky, C. Hamilton
{"title":"裸露手指或刚性探针接触表面时的力变化","authors":"S. Lederman, R. Howe, R. Klatzky, C. Hamilton","doi":"10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study evaluated subjects' ability to control finger force during contact with a smooth plate. They were instructed to maintain a constant \"light\" or \"medium\" force when statically contacting the surface or when moving the end effector (finger or rigid probe) back and forth at 20 or 222 mm/s. Subjects pressed harder when using the probe (cf. finger) and during static contact (cf. both motion conditions). Conversely, the coefficient of variation for force (standard deviation/mean) was smallest for static conditions and when the probe is used. Force variability proved to be relatively high in the current experimental conditions, which are typically used during texture discrimination. Despite such variability, psychophysical research has shown that texture discrimination is in fact excellent. This finding markedly contrasts with grasping tasks, where both force control and outcome measures are excellent. We consider a number of implications of these results.","PeriodicalId":384123,"journal":{"name":"12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings.","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Force variability during surface contact with bare finger or rigid probe\",\"authors\":\"S. Lederman, R. Howe, R. Klatzky, C. Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study evaluated subjects' ability to control finger force during contact with a smooth plate. They were instructed to maintain a constant \\\"light\\\" or \\\"medium\\\" force when statically contacting the surface or when moving the end effector (finger or rigid probe) back and forth at 20 or 222 mm/s. Subjects pressed harder when using the probe (cf. finger) and during static contact (cf. both motion conditions). Conversely, the coefficient of variation for force (standard deviation/mean) was smallest for static conditions and when the probe is used. Force variability proved to be relatively high in the current experimental conditions, which are typically used during texture discrimination. Despite such variability, psychophysical research has shown that texture discrimination is in fact excellent. This finding markedly contrasts with grasping tasks, where both force control and outcome measures are excellent. We consider a number of implications of these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2004. HAPTICS '04. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2004.1287191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

目前的研究评估了受试者在接触光滑板时控制手指力量的能力。他们被要求在静态接触表面或以20或222毫米/秒的速度来回移动末端执行器(手指或刚性探头)时保持恒定的“轻”或“中等”力。受试者在使用探针时(如手指)和在静态接触时(如两种运动条件下)用力按压。相反,力的变异系数(标准差/平均值)在静态条件下和使用探针时最小。在当前的实验条件下,力变异性被证明是相对较高的,这通常用于纹理识别。尽管存在这样的差异,心理物理学研究表明,纹理辨别实际上是非常出色的。这一发现与抓握任务形成鲜明对比,抓握任务的力控制和结果测量都很好。我们考虑了这些结果的一些含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Force variability during surface contact with bare finger or rigid probe
The current study evaluated subjects' ability to control finger force during contact with a smooth plate. They were instructed to maintain a constant "light" or "medium" force when statically contacting the surface or when moving the end effector (finger or rigid probe) back and forth at 20 or 222 mm/s. Subjects pressed harder when using the probe (cf. finger) and during static contact (cf. both motion conditions). Conversely, the coefficient of variation for force (standard deviation/mean) was smallest for static conditions and when the probe is used. Force variability proved to be relatively high in the current experimental conditions, which are typically used during texture discrimination. Despite such variability, psychophysical research has shown that texture discrimination is in fact excellent. This finding markedly contrasts with grasping tasks, where both force control and outcome measures are excellent. We consider a number of implications of these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信