犬免疫介导的多发性关节炎:皮质类固醇是最好的选择吗?

Hannah K Walker
{"title":"犬免疫介导的多发性关节炎:皮质类固醇是最好的选择吗?","authors":"Hannah K Walker","doi":"10.18849/ve.v8i1.584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO question\nIn dogs with type I immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA), is sole treatment with other immunosuppressive agents as effective as treatment with corticosteroids at reducing clinical signs?\n \nClinical bottom line\nCategory of research question\nTreatment.\nNumber and type of study designs reviews\nOne pragmatic open-label randomised controlled clinical trial.\nStrength of evidence\nWeak.\nOutcomes reported\nIn the single randomised controlled clinical trial reviewed, 7/10 (70%) of dogs in both treatment groups (prednisone or cyclosporine), were reported to have shown resolution of owner-reported symptoms, clinical symptoms and improved locomotor scores and cytologic signs of disease at the end of the 90 day trial period. Of the remaining dogs, 2/3 cyclosporine treated dogs required change to prednisone, and 2/3 prednisone treated dogs required combination therapy to achieve clinical response.\nConclusion\nThere is insufficient evidence to support the use of alternative immunosuppressive agents in place of corticosteroids for the treatment of IMPA type I. Further controlled clinical trials are needed before a change to clinical practice can be considered.\n \nHow to apply this evidence in practice\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune-mediated polyarthritis in dogs: Are corticosteroids the best bet?\",\"authors\":\"Hannah K Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.18849/ve.v8i1.584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PICO question\\nIn dogs with type I immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA), is sole treatment with other immunosuppressive agents as effective as treatment with corticosteroids at reducing clinical signs?\\n \\nClinical bottom line\\nCategory of research question\\nTreatment.\\nNumber and type of study designs reviews\\nOne pragmatic open-label randomised controlled clinical trial.\\nStrength of evidence\\nWeak.\\nOutcomes reported\\nIn the single randomised controlled clinical trial reviewed, 7/10 (70%) of dogs in both treatment groups (prednisone or cyclosporine), were reported to have shown resolution of owner-reported symptoms, clinical symptoms and improved locomotor scores and cytologic signs of disease at the end of the 90 day trial period. Of the remaining dogs, 2/3 cyclosporine treated dogs required change to prednisone, and 2/3 prednisone treated dogs required combination therapy to achieve clinical response.\\nConclusion\\nThere is insufficient evidence to support the use of alternative immunosuppressive agents in place of corticosteroids for the treatment of IMPA type I. Further controlled clinical trials are needed before a change to clinical practice can be considered.\\n \\nHow to apply this evidence in practice\\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.\\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Evidence\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i1.584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i1.584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于患有I型免疫介导性多关节炎(IMPA)的狗,单独使用其他免疫抑制剂治疗在减少临床症状方面是否与皮质类固醇治疗同样有效?临床底线研究问题类别治疗。研究设计的数量和类型综述一项实用的开放标签随机对照临床试验。证据强度:弱。在回顾的单随机对照临床试验中,据报道,在90天的试验结束时,两个治疗组(泼尼松或环孢素)中有7/10(70%)的狗显示出主人报告的症状、临床症状和改善的运动评分和疾病的细胞学体征。其余三分之二的环孢素治疗犬需要改为强的松治疗,三分之二的强的松治疗犬需要联合治疗才能达到临床疗效。结论支持使用替代免疫抑制剂替代糖皮质激素治疗i型IMPA的证据不足,需要进一步的对照临床试验才能考虑改变临床实践。如何将证据应用于实践应考虑多种因素,不限于:个人临床专业知识、患者的情况和所有者的价值观、您工作的国家、地点或诊所、您面前的个案、治疗方法和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune-mediated polyarthritis in dogs: Are corticosteroids the best bet?
PICO question In dogs with type I immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA), is sole treatment with other immunosuppressive agents as effective as treatment with corticosteroids at reducing clinical signs?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviews One pragmatic open-label randomised controlled clinical trial. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported In the single randomised controlled clinical trial reviewed, 7/10 (70%) of dogs in both treatment groups (prednisone or cyclosporine), were reported to have shown resolution of owner-reported symptoms, clinical symptoms and improved locomotor scores and cytologic signs of disease at the end of the 90 day trial period. Of the remaining dogs, 2/3 cyclosporine treated dogs required change to prednisone, and 2/3 prednisone treated dogs required combination therapy to achieve clinical response. Conclusion There is insufficient evidence to support the use of alternative immunosuppressive agents in place of corticosteroids for the treatment of IMPA type I. Further controlled clinical trials are needed before a change to clinical practice can be considered.   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信