Frizka Fitriana, Ema Utami, Hanif Al Fatta
{"title":"Analisis Sentimen Opini Terhadap Vaksin Covid - 19 pada Media Sosial Twitter Menggunakan Support Vector Machine dan Naive Bayes","authors":"Frizka Fitriana, Ema Utami, Hanif Al Fatta","doi":"10.31603/KOMTIKA.V5I1.5185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The corona virus outbreak, commonly referred to as COVID-19, has been officially designated a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). To minimize the impact caused by the virus, one of the right steps is to develop a vaccine, however, with the vaccination for the Indonesian people, it is controversial so that it invites many people to give an opinion assessment, but the limited space makes it difficult for the public to express their opinion, because Therefore, people choose social media as a place to channel public opinion. Support vector machine algorithm has better performance in terms of accuracy, precision and recall with values ​​of 90.47%, 90.23%, 90.78% with performance values ​​on the Bayes algorithm, namely 88.64%, 87.32%, 88, 13%, with a difference of 1.83% accuracy, 2.91% precision and 2.65% recall, while for time the Naive Bayes algorithm has a better performance level with a value of 8.1 seconds and the Support vector machine algorithm gets a time speed of 11 seconds with a difference of 2, 9 seconds. With the results of sentiment analysis neutral 8.76%, negative 42.92% and positive 48.32% for Bayes and neutral 10.56%, negative 41.28% and positive 48.16% for SVM.","PeriodicalId":292404,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi dan Informatika)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi dan Informatika)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/KOMTIKA.V5I1.5185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

通常被称为COVID-19的冠状病毒爆发已被世界卫生组织(世卫组织)正式指定为全球大流行。为了尽量减少病毒造成的影响,正确的步骤之一是开发疫苗,然而,为印度尼西亚人民接种疫苗,这是有争议的,因此它邀请了很多人给出意见评估,但有限的空间使得公众很难表达自己的意见,因为因此,人们选择社交媒体作为引导民意的地方。支持向量机算法具有更好的性能在准确性方面,精度和召回值的90.47%,90.23%,90.78%,贝叶斯算法性能值,即88.64%,87.32%,13%,88年1.83%的准确率差,精度2.91%和2.65%的回忆,虽然时间朴素贝叶斯算法有更好的性能水平值为8.1秒,支持向量机算法得到一段时间的速度11秒2的差异,9秒。情感分析结果贝叶斯为中性8.76%,负42.92%,正48.32%,支持向量机为中性10.56%,负41.28%,正48.16%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Sentimen Opini Terhadap Vaksin Covid - 19 pada Media Sosial Twitter Menggunakan Support Vector Machine dan Naive Bayes
The corona virus outbreak, commonly referred to as COVID-19, has been officially designated a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). To minimize the impact caused by the virus, one of the right steps is to develop a vaccine, however, with the vaccination for the Indonesian people, it is controversial so that it invites many people to give an opinion assessment, but the limited space makes it difficult for the public to express their opinion, because Therefore, people choose social media as a place to channel public opinion. Support vector machine algorithm has better performance in terms of accuracy, precision and recall with values ​​of 90.47%, 90.23%, 90.78% with performance values ​​on the Bayes algorithm, namely 88.64%, 87.32%, 88, 13%, with a difference of 1.83% accuracy, 2.91% precision and 2.65% recall, while for time the Naive Bayes algorithm has a better performance level with a value of 8.1 seconds and the Support vector machine algorithm gets a time speed of 11 seconds with a difference of 2, 9 seconds. With the results of sentiment analysis neutral 8.76%, negative 42.92% and positive 48.32% for Bayes and neutral 10.56%, negative 41.28% and positive 48.16% for SVM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信