审计师独立性与审计师议价能力:关于持续经营决策审计错误的一些西班牙证据

Marcos Antón Renart, P. Barnes
{"title":"审计师独立性与审计师议价能力:关于持续经营决策审计错误的一些西班牙证据","authors":"Marcos Antón Renart, P. Barnes","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that where an auditor's relative bargaining power is high, this may help its independence and prevent a Type II error (no qualification but corporate failure). It is less well known that this may also lead to a lack of independence in the form of over‐conservatism and an unjustified inclination by an auditor to qualify to protect its reputation leading to a Type I error (a qualification but no corporate failure). We therefore hypothesize that there is a positive relationship between the auditor's relative bargaining power and Type I errors (‘H’) and a negative relationship between it and Type II errors (‘H’). The empirical study supports H but rejects H. Taken together, these results suggest that Spanish auditors have a high propensity to qualify to protect their reputation, undeterred by pressure from client companies, in order to protect their reputation – ‘over‐conservatism’ as we have called it.","PeriodicalId":134477,"journal":{"name":"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditor Independence and Auditor Bargaining Power: Some Spanish Evidence Concerning Audit Error in the Going Concern Decision\",\"authors\":\"Marcos Antón Renart, P. Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijau.12003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well known that where an auditor's relative bargaining power is high, this may help its independence and prevent a Type II error (no qualification but corporate failure). It is less well known that this may also lead to a lack of independence in the form of over‐conservatism and an unjustified inclination by an auditor to qualify to protect its reputation leading to a Type I error (a qualification but no corporate failure). We therefore hypothesize that there is a positive relationship between the auditor's relative bargaining power and Type I errors (‘H’) and a negative relationship between it and Type II errors (‘H’). The empirical study supports H but rejects H. Taken together, these results suggest that Spanish auditors have a high propensity to qualify to protect their reputation, undeterred by pressure from client companies, in order to protect their reputation – ‘over‐conservatism’ as we have called it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

众所周知,当审计师的相对议价能力较高时,这可能有助于其独立性并防止第二类错误(没有资格但公司失败)。不太为人所知的是,这也可能导致审计师以过度保守的形式缺乏独立性,以及不合理地倾向于通过资格认证来保护其声誉,从而导致第一类错误(有资格认证,但没有公司失败)。因此,我们假设审计师的相对议价能力与第一类错误(“H”)之间存在正相关关系,与第二类错误(“H”)之间存在负相关关系。实证研究支持H,但拒绝H。综上所述,这些结果表明,西班牙审计师有很高的倾向,有资格保护自己的声誉,不被客户公司的压力吓住,为了保护自己的声誉——我们称之为“过度保守主义”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditor Independence and Auditor Bargaining Power: Some Spanish Evidence Concerning Audit Error in the Going Concern Decision
It is well known that where an auditor's relative bargaining power is high, this may help its independence and prevent a Type II error (no qualification but corporate failure). It is less well known that this may also lead to a lack of independence in the form of over‐conservatism and an unjustified inclination by an auditor to qualify to protect its reputation leading to a Type I error (a qualification but no corporate failure). We therefore hypothesize that there is a positive relationship between the auditor's relative bargaining power and Type I errors (‘H’) and a negative relationship between it and Type II errors (‘H’). The empirical study supports H but rejects H. Taken together, these results suggest that Spanish auditors have a high propensity to qualify to protect their reputation, undeterred by pressure from client companies, in order to protect their reputation – ‘over‐conservatism’ as we have called it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信