选举数据中的异常检测及其对美国基础设施脆弱性的表征

Jason Green
{"title":"选举数据中的异常检测及其对美国基础设施脆弱性的表征","authors":"Jason Green","doi":"10.1109/iemcon53756.2021.9623111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to showcase an idea to research election data fraud attempting to alter outcomes and to assess if the implications fall in line with weaknesses of the U.S. infrastructures. By employing supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Isolation Forest on the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and Polling datasets, this paper explores potential data fraud via any possible detected anomalies. Through the experiment and analysis, results indicate a ~9% anomalous data entries in the polling results dataset. Due to lack of ground truth on the latter dataset, it is impossible to determine its accuracy. Therefore, the link between possible anomalies and data fraud attempts cannot be drawn. Further research can be done to better examine this link. Despite that, sufficient known publications about the dangers of data manipulation, especially to US infrastructures, can already indicate an alarming vulnerability of the US infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":272590,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anomaly Detection in Election Data and its Representation of U.S. Infrastructure Vulnerability\",\"authors\":\"Jason Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iemcon53756.2021.9623111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to showcase an idea to research election data fraud attempting to alter outcomes and to assess if the implications fall in line with weaknesses of the U.S. infrastructures. By employing supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Isolation Forest on the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and Polling datasets, this paper explores potential data fraud via any possible detected anomalies. Through the experiment and analysis, results indicate a ~9% anomalous data entries in the polling results dataset. Due to lack of ground truth on the latter dataset, it is impossible to determine its accuracy. Therefore, the link between possible anomalies and data fraud attempts cannot be drawn. Further research can be done to better examine this link. Despite that, sufficient known publications about the dangers of data manipulation, especially to US infrastructures, can already indicate an alarming vulnerability of the US infrastructures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iemcon53756.2021.9623111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iemcon53756.2021.9623111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是展示一种研究试图改变结果的选举数据欺诈的想法,并评估其影响是否符合美国基础设施的弱点。通过对2016年美国总统选举和投票数据集采用决策树、随机森林和隔离森林等监督和无监督机器学习技术,本文通过任何可能检测到的异常来探索潜在的数据欺诈。通过实验和分析,结果表明,投票结果数据集中有9%的异常数据条目。由于后者的数据集缺乏真实值,因此无法确定其准确性。因此,无法将可能的异常与数据欺诈企图联系起来。可以做进一步的研究来更好地检验这种联系。尽管如此,关于数据操纵危险的足够多的已知出版物,特别是对美国基础设施的危险,已经可以表明美国基础设施的惊人脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anomaly Detection in Election Data and its Representation of U.S. Infrastructure Vulnerability
The purpose of this paper is to showcase an idea to research election data fraud attempting to alter outcomes and to assess if the implications fall in line with weaknesses of the U.S. infrastructures. By employing supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques such as Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Isolation Forest on the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and Polling datasets, this paper explores potential data fraud via any possible detected anomalies. Through the experiment and analysis, results indicate a ~9% anomalous data entries in the polling results dataset. Due to lack of ground truth on the latter dataset, it is impossible to determine its accuracy. Therefore, the link between possible anomalies and data fraud attempts cannot be drawn. Further research can be done to better examine this link. Despite that, sufficient known publications about the dangers of data manipulation, especially to US infrastructures, can already indicate an alarming vulnerability of the US infrastructures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信