胫骨截肢患者踝足假体刚度差异阈值的研究

Max K. Shepherd, Alejandro F. Azocar, M. Major, Elliott J. Rouse
{"title":"胫骨截肢患者踝足假体刚度差异阈值的研究","authors":"Max K. Shepherd, Alejandro F. Azocar, M. Major, Elliott J. Rouse","doi":"10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most prosthetic feet behave like springs, and their stiffness affects many important facets of amputee gait. Despite the importance of prosthesis stiffness, the ability of amputees to sense stiffness changes-that is, distinguish between more or less stiff feet-is unknown. This perceptual resolution has implications for the methodology and overall significance of selecting the optimal foot stiffness during prescription. In this experiment, we used a custom, variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to make small adjustments to stiffness in between steps, and below-knee amputees were asked to identify whether the ankle became more or less stiff. We determined that the average difference threshold of stiffness was 8%, meaning that subjects could correctly identify an 8% change in stiffness 75% of the time. This high sensitivity underscores the importance of optimizing prosthesis stiffness on an individual basis, and suggests a shift is needed in the characterization of commercial feet and the use of stiffness variation during the prescription process.","PeriodicalId":382522,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Difference Threshold of Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Stiffness for Persons with Transtibial Amputation\",\"authors\":\"Max K. Shepherd, Alejandro F. Azocar, M. Major, Elliott J. Rouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most prosthetic feet behave like springs, and their stiffness affects many important facets of amputee gait. Despite the importance of prosthesis stiffness, the ability of amputees to sense stiffness changes-that is, distinguish between more or less stiff feet-is unknown. This perceptual resolution has implications for the methodology and overall significance of selecting the optimal foot stiffness during prescription. In this experiment, we used a custom, variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to make small adjustments to stiffness in between steps, and below-knee amputees were asked to identify whether the ankle became more or less stiff. We determined that the average difference threshold of stiffness was 8%, meaning that subjects could correctly identify an 8% change in stiffness 75% of the time. This high sensitivity underscores the importance of optimizing prosthesis stiffness on an individual basis, and suggests a shift is needed in the characterization of commercial feet and the use of stiffness variation during the prescription process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2018.8488075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

大多数假肢脚的行为像弹簧,它们的刚度影响截肢者步态的许多重要方面。尽管义肢僵硬度很重要,但截肢者感知僵硬度变化的能力——即区分僵硬程度的能力——尚不清楚。这种感知分辨率对处方中选择最佳足部刚度的方法和总体意义具有影响。在这个实验中,我们使用了一个定制的可变刚度踝关节假体,在每一步之间对刚度进行小的调整,并要求膝盖以下截肢者识别脚踝是否变得更僵硬或更不僵硬。我们确定刚度的平均差异阈值为8%,这意味着受试者可以在75%的时间内正确识别8%的刚度变化。这种高灵敏度强调了在个体基础上优化假体刚度的重要性,并建议在处方过程中对商业足的表征和刚度变化的使用进行转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Difference Threshold of Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Stiffness for Persons with Transtibial Amputation
Most prosthetic feet behave like springs, and their stiffness affects many important facets of amputee gait. Despite the importance of prosthesis stiffness, the ability of amputees to sense stiffness changes-that is, distinguish between more or less stiff feet-is unknown. This perceptual resolution has implications for the methodology and overall significance of selecting the optimal foot stiffness during prescription. In this experiment, we used a custom, variable-stiffness ankle prosthesis to make small adjustments to stiffness in between steps, and below-knee amputees were asked to identify whether the ankle became more or less stiff. We determined that the average difference threshold of stiffness was 8%, meaning that subjects could correctly identify an 8% change in stiffness 75% of the time. This high sensitivity underscores the importance of optimizing prosthesis stiffness on an individual basis, and suggests a shift is needed in the characterization of commercial feet and the use of stiffness variation during the prescription process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信