棕榈油叶活性炭吸附草甘膦的动力学分析

Hartinie Marbawi, Muhammad Arif Mukhriz Ros Saidon Khudri, A. Othman, M. Halmi, J. Gansau, N. A. Yasid
{"title":"棕榈油叶活性炭吸附草甘膦的动力学分析","authors":"Hartinie Marbawi, Muhammad Arif Mukhriz Ros Saidon Khudri, A. Othman, M. Halmi, J. Gansau, N. A. Yasid","doi":"10.54987/bstr.v7i1.461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing techniques for the treatment of pollutants include membrane separation, ion exchange, precipitation, transformation and biosorption. Of all of this technology, biosorption has several positive aspects which include low operating expenses, very efficient detoxification of toxicants at low concentrations, low amount of disposal materials and does not need nutrient requirements as in bacterial-based remediation, the latter of which is limited by the presence of heavy metals and other toxicants. The biosorption of glyphosate on palm oil fronds activated carbon can be an efficient and low-cost tool for remediation of glyphosate. The absorption kinetics data of biosorption isotherm on the biosorption of glyphosate on palm oil fronds activated carbon were analyzed using three models—pseudo-1st, pseudo-2nd and Elovich, and fitted using non-linear regression. The Elovich model was the poorest in fitting the curve based on visual observation followed by the pseudo-1st order. Statistical analysis based on root-mean-square error (RMSE), adjusted coefficient of determination (adjR2), bias factor (BF), accuracy factor (AF), corrected AICc (Akaike Information Criterion), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQC) that showed that the pseudo-second order model is the best model. Kinetic analysis using the pseudo-second order model at 250 mg/L glyphosate gave a value of equilibrium sorption capacity qe of 94.12 mg g-1 (95% confidence interval from 89.913 to 98.332) and a value of the pseudo-second-order rate constant, k2 of 0.02 (95% confidence interval from 0.012 to 0.023). Further analysis is needed to provide proof for the chemisorption mechanism usually tied to this kinetic.","PeriodicalId":436607,"journal":{"name":"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinetic Analysis of the Adsorption of Glyphosate onto Palm Oil Fronds Activated Carbon\",\"authors\":\"Hartinie Marbawi, Muhammad Arif Mukhriz Ros Saidon Khudri, A. Othman, M. Halmi, J. Gansau, N. A. Yasid\",\"doi\":\"10.54987/bstr.v7i1.461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing techniques for the treatment of pollutants include membrane separation, ion exchange, precipitation, transformation and biosorption. Of all of this technology, biosorption has several positive aspects which include low operating expenses, very efficient detoxification of toxicants at low concentrations, low amount of disposal materials and does not need nutrient requirements as in bacterial-based remediation, the latter of which is limited by the presence of heavy metals and other toxicants. The biosorption of glyphosate on palm oil fronds activated carbon can be an efficient and low-cost tool for remediation of glyphosate. The absorption kinetics data of biosorption isotherm on the biosorption of glyphosate on palm oil fronds activated carbon were analyzed using three models—pseudo-1st, pseudo-2nd and Elovich, and fitted using non-linear regression. The Elovich model was the poorest in fitting the curve based on visual observation followed by the pseudo-1st order. Statistical analysis based on root-mean-square error (RMSE), adjusted coefficient of determination (adjR2), bias factor (BF), accuracy factor (AF), corrected AICc (Akaike Information Criterion), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQC) that showed that the pseudo-second order model is the best model. Kinetic analysis using the pseudo-second order model at 250 mg/L glyphosate gave a value of equilibrium sorption capacity qe of 94.12 mg g-1 (95% confidence interval from 89.913 to 98.332) and a value of the pseudo-second-order rate constant, k2 of 0.02 (95% confidence interval from 0.012 to 0.023). Further analysis is needed to provide proof for the chemisorption mechanism usually tied to this kinetic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54987/bstr.v7i1.461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54987/bstr.v7i1.461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

现有的污染物处理技术包括膜分离、离子交换、沉淀、转化和生物吸附。在所有这些技术中,生物吸附有几个积极的方面,包括操作费用低,在低浓度下非常有效地解毒,处理材料的数量少,并且不需要像基于细菌的补救那样需要营养物质,后者受到重金属和其他毒物的限制。棕榈油叶活性炭对草甘膦的生物吸附是一种高效、低成本的草甘膦修复方法。采用伪1、伪2和Elovich模型对棕榈油叶活性炭吸附草甘膦的等温线吸附动力学数据进行分析,并采用非线性回归进行拟合。Elovich模型在拟合基于视觉观察的伪一阶曲线时效果最差。基于均方根误差(RMSE)、调整后的决定系数(adjR2)、偏差因子(BF)、精度因子(AF)、修正后的Akaike信息准则(AICc)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)和hannan - Quinn信息准则(HQC)的统计分析表明,拟二阶模型是最佳模型。在草甘膦浓度为250 mg/L时,采用拟二级模型进行动力学分析,得到平衡吸附容量qe为94.12 mg g-1(95%置信区间为89.913 ~ 98.332),拟二级速率常数k2为0.02(95%置信区间为0.012 ~ 0.023)。需要进一步的分析来证明通常与这种动力学有关的化学吸附机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinetic Analysis of the Adsorption of Glyphosate onto Palm Oil Fronds Activated Carbon
Existing techniques for the treatment of pollutants include membrane separation, ion exchange, precipitation, transformation and biosorption. Of all of this technology, biosorption has several positive aspects which include low operating expenses, very efficient detoxification of toxicants at low concentrations, low amount of disposal materials and does not need nutrient requirements as in bacterial-based remediation, the latter of which is limited by the presence of heavy metals and other toxicants. The biosorption of glyphosate on palm oil fronds activated carbon can be an efficient and low-cost tool for remediation of glyphosate. The absorption kinetics data of biosorption isotherm on the biosorption of glyphosate on palm oil fronds activated carbon were analyzed using three models—pseudo-1st, pseudo-2nd and Elovich, and fitted using non-linear regression. The Elovich model was the poorest in fitting the curve based on visual observation followed by the pseudo-1st order. Statistical analysis based on root-mean-square error (RMSE), adjusted coefficient of determination (adjR2), bias factor (BF), accuracy factor (AF), corrected AICc (Akaike Information Criterion), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQC) that showed that the pseudo-second order model is the best model. Kinetic analysis using the pseudo-second order model at 250 mg/L glyphosate gave a value of equilibrium sorption capacity qe of 94.12 mg g-1 (95% confidence interval from 89.913 to 98.332) and a value of the pseudo-second-order rate constant, k2 of 0.02 (95% confidence interval from 0.012 to 0.023). Further analysis is needed to provide proof for the chemisorption mechanism usually tied to this kinetic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信