斜颈植入设计是否有利于All-on-4手术?三维有限元分析

M. Toprak
{"title":"斜颈植入设计是否有利于All-on-4手术?三维有限元分析","authors":"M. Toprak","doi":"10.5577/jomdi.e230310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In the treatment of edentulous resorbed mandibles using All-on-4 concept, the distal part of posteriorly tilted implants with a conventional flat neck design is usually embedded in the bone, which may lead to improper installation or positioning of angled multiunit abutments. Bone trimming from the distal area, where the implant neck is embedded in the bone, is typically necessary to avoid this complication. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of a sloped marginal neck configuration of implant posteriorly tilted at 30° in edentulous mandibles using a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA).\nMethodology: The sloped neck implants were posteriorly tilted at 30° without any further operation in the edentulous mandibular model designed using the FEA. The tilted conventional flat neck implants were placed at the same length, diameter, and angle, and 2 mm2 of bone was trimmed from the distal area. Similar multiunit abutments, two conventional flat neck implants axially placed on the anterior side, titanium frameworks, and acrylic resin prosthetic dentures were created for both models. The biomechanical behaviors of the models were evaluated by applying a foodstuff force of 50 N to the incisors, 100 N to the premolars, and 150 N to the molar cantilever.\nResults: The von Mises stress value of the sloped neck implants (158.489 MPa) was lower than that of the conventional flat neck implants (177.208 MPa). Both the maximum and minimum principal stress values ​​in the surrounding cortical and cancellous bones were within the acceptable physiological limits.\nConclusion: Sloped neck implants can be placed easily and are less invasive than conventional flat neck implants; thus, they can be a treatment alternative that can facilitate the All-on-4 concept.\n \nHow to cite this article:\nToprak ME. Does a sloped neck implant design facilitate All-on-4 surgeries? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Med Dent Invest 2023;4:e230310. https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e230310\n \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":415108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Dental Investigations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a sloped neck implant design facilitate All-on-4 surgeries? A three-dimensional finite element analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Toprak\",\"doi\":\"10.5577/jomdi.e230310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: In the treatment of edentulous resorbed mandibles using All-on-4 concept, the distal part of posteriorly tilted implants with a conventional flat neck design is usually embedded in the bone, which may lead to improper installation or positioning of angled multiunit abutments. Bone trimming from the distal area, where the implant neck is embedded in the bone, is typically necessary to avoid this complication. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of a sloped marginal neck configuration of implant posteriorly tilted at 30° in edentulous mandibles using a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA).\\nMethodology: The sloped neck implants were posteriorly tilted at 30° without any further operation in the edentulous mandibular model designed using the FEA. The tilted conventional flat neck implants were placed at the same length, diameter, and angle, and 2 mm2 of bone was trimmed from the distal area. Similar multiunit abutments, two conventional flat neck implants axially placed on the anterior side, titanium frameworks, and acrylic resin prosthetic dentures were created for both models. The biomechanical behaviors of the models were evaluated by applying a foodstuff force of 50 N to the incisors, 100 N to the premolars, and 150 N to the molar cantilever.\\nResults: The von Mises stress value of the sloped neck implants (158.489 MPa) was lower than that of the conventional flat neck implants (177.208 MPa). Both the maximum and minimum principal stress values ​​in the surrounding cortical and cancellous bones were within the acceptable physiological limits.\\nConclusion: Sloped neck implants can be placed easily and are less invasive than conventional flat neck implants; thus, they can be a treatment alternative that can facilitate the All-on-4 concept.\\n \\nHow to cite this article:\\nToprak ME. Does a sloped neck implant design facilitate All-on-4 surgeries? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Med Dent Invest 2023;4:e230310. https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e230310\\n \\nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical and Dental Investigations\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical and Dental Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e230310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Dental Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e230310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在All-on-4概念治疗无牙吸收下颌骨时,传统平颈设计的后倾种植体远端部分通常嵌入骨内,这可能导致角度多单元基牙的安装或定位不当。从远端区域(种植体颈部嵌入骨内)进行骨修剪通常是必要的,以避免这种并发症。本研究旨在利用三维有限元分析(FEA)评估无牙下颌骨后倾30°种植体倾斜边缘颈结构的生物力学行为。方法:采用有限元法设计无牙下颌模型,将斜颈种植体后倾30°,无需进一步手术。以相同的长度、直径和角度放置倾斜的传统平颈种植体,并从远端区域修剪2 mm2的骨。为两种模型分别制作了相似的多单元基台,两个传统的平颈种植体轴向放置在前侧,钛框架和丙烯酸树脂义齿。通过对切牙、前磨牙和臼齿悬臂分别施加50 N、100 N和150 N的食物力来评估模型的生物力学行为。结果:斜颈种植体的von Mises应力值(158.489 MPa)低于常规平颈种植体的von Mises应力值(177.208 MPa)。周围皮质骨和松质骨的最大和最小主应力值均在可接受的生理范围内。结论:斜颈种植体较常规平颈种植体放置方便,创伤小;因此,它们可以成为一种治疗替代方案,可以促进All-on-4概念。如何引用本文:Toprak ME。斜颈植入设计是否有利于All-on-4手术?三维有限元分析。中国生物医学工程学报(英文版);2009;31(4):393 - 393。https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e230310语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a sloped neck implant design facilitate All-on-4 surgeries? A three-dimensional finite element analysis
Aim: In the treatment of edentulous resorbed mandibles using All-on-4 concept, the distal part of posteriorly tilted implants with a conventional flat neck design is usually embedded in the bone, which may lead to improper installation or positioning of angled multiunit abutments. Bone trimming from the distal area, where the implant neck is embedded in the bone, is typically necessary to avoid this complication. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of a sloped marginal neck configuration of implant posteriorly tilted at 30° in edentulous mandibles using a three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA). Methodology: The sloped neck implants were posteriorly tilted at 30° without any further operation in the edentulous mandibular model designed using the FEA. The tilted conventional flat neck implants were placed at the same length, diameter, and angle, and 2 mm2 of bone was trimmed from the distal area. Similar multiunit abutments, two conventional flat neck implants axially placed on the anterior side, titanium frameworks, and acrylic resin prosthetic dentures were created for both models. The biomechanical behaviors of the models were evaluated by applying a foodstuff force of 50 N to the incisors, 100 N to the premolars, and 150 N to the molar cantilever. Results: The von Mises stress value of the sloped neck implants (158.489 MPa) was lower than that of the conventional flat neck implants (177.208 MPa). Both the maximum and minimum principal stress values ​​in the surrounding cortical and cancellous bones were within the acceptable physiological limits. Conclusion: Sloped neck implants can be placed easily and are less invasive than conventional flat neck implants; thus, they can be a treatment alternative that can facilitate the All-on-4 concept.   How to cite this article: Toprak ME. Does a sloped neck implant design facilitate All-on-4 surgeries? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Med Dent Invest 2023;4:e230310. https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e230310   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信