利用股票市场证据为竞争法中的产品市场定义提供依据

P. Grout, F. Windmeijer, A. Zalewska
{"title":"利用股票市场证据为竞争法中的产品市场定义提供依据","authors":"P. Grout, F. Windmeijer, A. Zalewska","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1545502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market definition, and, in particular, being able to identify who is in which product market, lies at the heart of competition law. The identification of demand elasticities necessary to conduct a formal definition of product market can be time consuming and often there is insufficient data to provide an accurate answer. This paper suggests a possible tool for market definition using stock market data. The method is informative, simple and very quick to undertake. The approach assumes that a company’s returns depend on an economy wide factor, a product market specific factor and company specific idiosyncratic shocks. Given this assumption, the residuals from Market Model regressions will be more correlated for firms in the same product market than between firms in different product markets. To test the validity of this assumption, the central section of the paper looks at whether these correlations do indeed contain information about product markets. Using 51 companies and 13 product markets suggested by the Competition Commission (the “CC”), we calculate the correlation matrix of residuals and for each company identify the company with which it has the highest correlation. If the correlation matrix contains information about product markets then there should be some relationship between the correlations and the suggested CC markets. If the correlation of residuals contains no information with regard to relevant product market, then the chance of the highest correlation for a company being with a company from the same CC defined relevant product market would be roughly 7.5%. However, we find that in 82% of the cases the highest correlation for a company is with a company from the same CC defined relevant market. Finally, we examine the banking, the home credit and the ex-building society markets.","PeriodicalId":204227,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Corporate Law Including Merger & Acquisitions Law (Sub-Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Stock Market Evidence to Inform the Definition of Product Markets in Competition Law\",\"authors\":\"P. Grout, F. Windmeijer, A. Zalewska\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1545502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Market definition, and, in particular, being able to identify who is in which product market, lies at the heart of competition law. The identification of demand elasticities necessary to conduct a formal definition of product market can be time consuming and often there is insufficient data to provide an accurate answer. This paper suggests a possible tool for market definition using stock market data. The method is informative, simple and very quick to undertake. The approach assumes that a company’s returns depend on an economy wide factor, a product market specific factor and company specific idiosyncratic shocks. Given this assumption, the residuals from Market Model regressions will be more correlated for firms in the same product market than between firms in different product markets. To test the validity of this assumption, the central section of the paper looks at whether these correlations do indeed contain information about product markets. Using 51 companies and 13 product markets suggested by the Competition Commission (the “CC”), we calculate the correlation matrix of residuals and for each company identify the company with which it has the highest correlation. If the correlation matrix contains information about product markets then there should be some relationship between the correlations and the suggested CC markets. If the correlation of residuals contains no information with regard to relevant product market, then the chance of the highest correlation for a company being with a company from the same CC defined relevant product market would be roughly 7.5%. However, we find that in 82% of the cases the highest correlation for a company is with a company from the same CC defined relevant market. Finally, we examine the banking, the home credit and the ex-building society markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Corporate Law Including Merger & Acquisitions Law (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Corporate Law Including Merger & Acquisitions Law (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1545502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Corporate Law Including Merger & Acquisitions Law (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1545502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

市场定义,特别是能够识别谁在哪个产品市场,是竞争法的核心。对产品市场进行正式定义所必需的需求弹性的识别可能是耗时的,而且往往没有足够的数据来提供准确的答案。本文提出了一种利用股票市场数据进行市场定义的可能工具。该方法信息量大,简单,易于操作。该方法假设一家公司的回报取决于一个整体经济因素、一个产品市场特定因素和一家公司特定的特殊冲击。基于这一假设,市场模型回归的残差在相同产品市场的企业之间比在不同产品市场的企业之间更具有相关性。为了检验这一假设的有效性,本文的中心部分考察了这些相关性是否确实包含有关产品市场的信息。利用竞争委员会(“CC”)建议的51家公司和13个产品市场,我们计算残差的相关矩阵,并为每个公司确定与其相关性最高的公司。如果相关矩阵包含有关产品市场的信息,那么在相关性和建议的CC市场之间应该存在一些关系。如果残差的相关性不包含有关相关产品市场的信息,那么一个公司与来自相同CC定义的相关产品市场的公司的最高相关性的机会大约是7.5%。然而,我们发现,在82%的情况下,一家公司的最高相关性是来自同一CC定义的相关市场的公司。最后,我们考察了银行、住房信贷和前建房互助会市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Stock Market Evidence to Inform the Definition of Product Markets in Competition Law
Market definition, and, in particular, being able to identify who is in which product market, lies at the heart of competition law. The identification of demand elasticities necessary to conduct a formal definition of product market can be time consuming and often there is insufficient data to provide an accurate answer. This paper suggests a possible tool for market definition using stock market data. The method is informative, simple and very quick to undertake. The approach assumes that a company’s returns depend on an economy wide factor, a product market specific factor and company specific idiosyncratic shocks. Given this assumption, the residuals from Market Model regressions will be more correlated for firms in the same product market than between firms in different product markets. To test the validity of this assumption, the central section of the paper looks at whether these correlations do indeed contain information about product markets. Using 51 companies and 13 product markets suggested by the Competition Commission (the “CC”), we calculate the correlation matrix of residuals and for each company identify the company with which it has the highest correlation. If the correlation matrix contains information about product markets then there should be some relationship between the correlations and the suggested CC markets. If the correlation of residuals contains no information with regard to relevant product market, then the chance of the highest correlation for a company being with a company from the same CC defined relevant product market would be roughly 7.5%. However, we find that in 82% of the cases the highest correlation for a company is with a company from the same CC defined relevant market. Finally, we examine the banking, the home credit and the ex-building society markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信