项目管理从业者对技术债务的看法调查——堆栈交换的初步研究

Felipe G. S. Gomes, Eder Pereira dos Santos, Sávio Freire, Manoel G. Mendonça, T. Mendes, R. Spínola
{"title":"项目管理从业者对技术债务的看法调查——堆栈交换的初步研究","authors":"Felipe G. S. Gomes, Eder Pereira dos Santos, Sávio Freire, Manoel G. Mendonça, T. Mendes, R. Spínola","doi":"10.1145/3524843.3528095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Technical debt (TD) can bring short-term benefits to software projects, but its presence is also associated with is-sues such as decreasing product quality. Recent literature has proposed indicator-based strategies for TD identification and different approaches for TD management, but most of them focused on the point of view of software developers. Little is still known about how project management practition-ers actually discuss, experience, and manage TD. Goal: This work investigates, from the point of view of project manage-ment practitioners, how they commonly discuss, experience, and manage TD. Method: We mined, curated, and selected a total of 42 TD discussions on Stack Exchange Project Man-agement (SEPM), totaling 583 messages. We analyzed this data set quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: The most commonly discussed types of debt are process and people, revealing 47 indicators for recognizing debt items. We also found 72 practices related to TD management. Conclusion: The perspective considered by project management practitioners to analyze the TD phenomenon is different from the one considered by other roles in the software development process. This work organizes the TD indicators and manage-ment practices identified in SEPM into a Sankey diagram, which may assist practitioners and serve as guidance for future research.","PeriodicalId":149335,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange\",\"authors\":\"Felipe G. S. Gomes, Eder Pereira dos Santos, Sávio Freire, Manoel G. Mendonça, T. Mendes, R. Spínola\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3524843.3528095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Technical debt (TD) can bring short-term benefits to software projects, but its presence is also associated with is-sues such as decreasing product quality. Recent literature has proposed indicator-based strategies for TD identification and different approaches for TD management, but most of them focused on the point of view of software developers. Little is still known about how project management practition-ers actually discuss, experience, and manage TD. Goal: This work investigates, from the point of view of project manage-ment practitioners, how they commonly discuss, experience, and manage TD. Method: We mined, curated, and selected a total of 42 TD discussions on Stack Exchange Project Man-agement (SEPM), totaling 583 messages. We analyzed this data set quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: The most commonly discussed types of debt are process and people, revealing 47 indicators for recognizing debt items. We also found 72 practices related to TD management. Conclusion: The perspective considered by project management practitioners to analyze the TD phenomenon is different from the one considered by other roles in the software development process. This work organizes the TD indicators and manage-ment practices identified in SEPM into a Sankey diagram, which may assist practitioners and serve as guidance for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524843.3528095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524843.3528095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:技术债务(TD)可以为软件项目带来短期利益,但是它的存在也与诸如降低产品质量之类的问题相关。最近的文献提出了基于指标的TD识别策略和TD管理的不同方法,但大多数都集中在软件开发人员的观点上。对于项目管理从业人员实际上是如何讨论、体验和管理TD的,我们所知甚少。目标:从项目管理实践者的角度来看,这项工作调查了他们通常是如何讨论、体验和管理TD的。方法:我们挖掘、整理并选择了42个关于堆栈交换项目管理(SEPM)的TD讨论,共计583条消息。我们对这些数据集进行了定量和定性分析。结果:最常讨论的债务类型是过程和人,揭示了47个识别债务项目的指标。我们还发现了72个与TD管理相关的实践。结论:项目管理从业者分析TD现象的视角不同于软件开发过程中其他角色所考虑的视角。这项工作将在SEPM中确定的TD指标和管理实践组织到Sankey图中,这可能有助于从业者并为未来的研究提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Point of View of Project Management Practitioners on Technical Debt - A Preliminary Study on Stack Exchange
Context: Technical debt (TD) can bring short-term benefits to software projects, but its presence is also associated with is-sues such as decreasing product quality. Recent literature has proposed indicator-based strategies for TD identification and different approaches for TD management, but most of them focused on the point of view of software developers. Little is still known about how project management practition-ers actually discuss, experience, and manage TD. Goal: This work investigates, from the point of view of project manage-ment practitioners, how they commonly discuss, experience, and manage TD. Method: We mined, curated, and selected a total of 42 TD discussions on Stack Exchange Project Man-agement (SEPM), totaling 583 messages. We analyzed this data set quantitatively and qualitatively. Results: The most commonly discussed types of debt are process and people, revealing 47 indicators for recognizing debt items. We also found 72 practices related to TD management. Conclusion: The perspective considered by project management practitioners to analyze the TD phenomenon is different from the one considered by other roles in the software development process. This work organizes the TD indicators and manage-ment practices identified in SEPM into a Sankey diagram, which may assist practitioners and serve as guidance for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信