实现RCP在真实网络中的大规模部署

Chia-Hui Tai, Jiang Zhu, Nandita Dukkipati
{"title":"实现RCP在真实网络中的大规模部署","authors":"Chia-Hui Tai, Jiang Zhu, Nandita Dukkipati","doi":"10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We recently proposed the rate control protocol (RCP) as a way to minimize download times (or flow-completion times). Simulations suggest that if RCP were widely deployed, downloads would frequently finish an order of magnitude faster than with TCP. This is because RCP involves explicit feedback from the routers along the path, allowing a sender to pick a fast starting rate, and adapt quickly to network conditions. RCP is particularly appealing because it can be shown to be stable under broad operating conditions, and its performance is independent of the flow-size distribution and the RTT. Although it requires changes to the routers, the changes are small: The routers keep no per-flow state or per-flow queues, and the per-packet processing is minimal. However, the bar is high for a new congestion control mechanism - introducing a new scheme requires enormous change, and the argument needs to be compelling. And so, to enable incremental deployment of RCP, we have built and tested an open and public implementation of RCP, and proposed solutions for deployments that require no fork-lift network upgrades. In this paper we describe our end-host and router implementation of RCP in Linux, and solutions to how RCP can coexist in a network carrying predominantly non-RCP traffic, and coordinate with routers that don't implement RCP. We hope that these solutions will take us closer to having an impact in real networks, not just for RCP but also for many other explicit congestion control protocols proposed in literature.","PeriodicalId":447520,"journal":{"name":"IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Large Scale Deployment of RCP Practical for Real Networks\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Hui Tai, Jiang Zhu, Nandita Dukkipati\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We recently proposed the rate control protocol (RCP) as a way to minimize download times (or flow-completion times). Simulations suggest that if RCP were widely deployed, downloads would frequently finish an order of magnitude faster than with TCP. This is because RCP involves explicit feedback from the routers along the path, allowing a sender to pick a fast starting rate, and adapt quickly to network conditions. RCP is particularly appealing because it can be shown to be stable under broad operating conditions, and its performance is independent of the flow-size distribution and the RTT. Although it requires changes to the routers, the changes are small: The routers keep no per-flow state or per-flow queues, and the per-packet processing is minimal. However, the bar is high for a new congestion control mechanism - introducing a new scheme requires enormous change, and the argument needs to be compelling. And so, to enable incremental deployment of RCP, we have built and tested an open and public implementation of RCP, and proposed solutions for deployments that require no fork-lift network upgrades. In this paper we describe our end-host and router implementation of RCP in Linux, and solutions to how RCP can coexist in a network carrying predominantly non-RCP traffic, and coordinate with routers that don't implement RCP. We hope that these solutions will take us closer to having an impact in real networks, not just for RCP but also for many other explicit congestion control protocols proposed in literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

我们最近提出了速率控制协议(RCP)作为最小化下载时间(或流完成时间)的一种方法。模拟表明,如果RCP被广泛部署,下载的完成速度通常会比TCP快一个数量级。这是因为RCP涉及到路径上路由器的显式反馈,允许发送方选择一个快速的启动速率,并快速适应网络条件。RCP特别具有吸引力,因为它可以在广泛的操作条件下保持稳定,并且其性能与流量分布和RTT无关。虽然它需要对路由器进行更改,但更改很小:路由器不保留每流状态或每流队列,并且每个数据包的处理是最小的。然而,对于一个新的拥塞控制机制来说,门槛很高——引入一个新的方案需要巨大的改变,而且争论需要令人信服。因此,为了实现RCP的增量部署,我们已经构建并测试了一个开放和公开的RCP实现,并提出了不需要叉式网络升级的部署解决方案。在本文中,我们描述了Linux中RCP的终端主机和路由器实现,以及RCP如何在主要承载非RCP流量的网络中共存,并与不实现RCP的路由器协调的解决方案。我们希望这些解决方案将使我们更接近于在现实网络中产生影响,不仅对RCP,而且对文献中提出的许多其他显式拥塞控制协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making Large Scale Deployment of RCP Practical for Real Networks
We recently proposed the rate control protocol (RCP) as a way to minimize download times (or flow-completion times). Simulations suggest that if RCP were widely deployed, downloads would frequently finish an order of magnitude faster than with TCP. This is because RCP involves explicit feedback from the routers along the path, allowing a sender to pick a fast starting rate, and adapt quickly to network conditions. RCP is particularly appealing because it can be shown to be stable under broad operating conditions, and its performance is independent of the flow-size distribution and the RTT. Although it requires changes to the routers, the changes are small: The routers keep no per-flow state or per-flow queues, and the per-packet processing is minimal. However, the bar is high for a new congestion control mechanism - introducing a new scheme requires enormous change, and the argument needs to be compelling. And so, to enable incremental deployment of RCP, we have built and tested an open and public implementation of RCP, and proposed solutions for deployments that require no fork-lift network upgrades. In this paper we describe our end-host and router implementation of RCP in Linux, and solutions to how RCP can coexist in a network carrying predominantly non-RCP traffic, and coordinate with routers that don't implement RCP. We hope that these solutions will take us closer to having an impact in real networks, not just for RCP but also for many other explicit congestion control protocols proposed in literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信