非粘接柔性管道的剧变屈曲:另一种方法

Sean A. Murray, Clara Casanovas, Z. Tan, Euan Trousdale, Jian Liu, Juliana Patrocinio, Linfa Zhu, Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro
{"title":"非粘接柔性管道的剧变屈曲:另一种方法","authors":"Sean A. Murray, Clara Casanovas, Z. Tan, Euan Trousdale, Jian Liu, Juliana Patrocinio, Linfa Zhu, Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro","doi":"10.4043/32279-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Due to their non-linear bending response, low bending stiffness and potentially high axial expansion coefficients, buried unbonded flexible pipes can be susceptible to Upheaval Buckling (UHB). The traditional industry approach is to prevent UHB by providing sufficient download to limit upwards movement of the pipe to very small levels (normally within the mobilisation distance of the soil). Since unbonded flexible pipes offer little resistance to bending, the required download to prevent UHB of unbonded flexible pipes can be significant resulting in prohibitive rock-dump requirements. However, by design, unbonded flexible pipes can accommodate large bending deformations without compromising the cross-sectional integrity of the pipe. The objective of this paper is to propose an approach which takes advantage of the pipes capability to accommodate large deformations and to minimize download requirements.\n This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of the state-of-the-art methods currently adopted in industry for the assessment of UHB of buried unbonded flexible pipelines. An alternative approach which permits significant upwards movement of the flexible pipe, taking advantage of the pipes ability to accommodate such movements, is also presented. A comparison of the potential failure modes, mechanisms and consequences associated with these approaches are studied and acceptance criteria are proposed. Parametric finite element analysis studies are performed to compare the flexible pipe behaviour and download requirements using the traditional approach and the proposed alternative approach.\n This paper presents case studies which demonstrate that significant savings in the volume of rock-dump can be safely made when permitting large deformations when compared to the traditional UHB prevention approach.","PeriodicalId":196855,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upheaval Buckling of Unbonded Flexible Pipes: An Alternative Approach\",\"authors\":\"Sean A. Murray, Clara Casanovas, Z. Tan, Euan Trousdale, Jian Liu, Juliana Patrocinio, Linfa Zhu, Mario Augusto Lopes de Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/32279-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Due to their non-linear bending response, low bending stiffness and potentially high axial expansion coefficients, buried unbonded flexible pipes can be susceptible to Upheaval Buckling (UHB). The traditional industry approach is to prevent UHB by providing sufficient download to limit upwards movement of the pipe to very small levels (normally within the mobilisation distance of the soil). Since unbonded flexible pipes offer little resistance to bending, the required download to prevent UHB of unbonded flexible pipes can be significant resulting in prohibitive rock-dump requirements. However, by design, unbonded flexible pipes can accommodate large bending deformations without compromising the cross-sectional integrity of the pipe. The objective of this paper is to propose an approach which takes advantage of the pipes capability to accommodate large deformations and to minimize download requirements.\\n This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of the state-of-the-art methods currently adopted in industry for the assessment of UHB of buried unbonded flexible pipelines. An alternative approach which permits significant upwards movement of the flexible pipe, taking advantage of the pipes ability to accommodate such movements, is also presented. A comparison of the potential failure modes, mechanisms and consequences associated with these approaches are studied and acceptance criteria are proposed. Parametric finite element analysis studies are performed to compare the flexible pipe behaviour and download requirements using the traditional approach and the proposed alternative approach.\\n This paper presents case studies which demonstrate that significant savings in the volume of rock-dump can be safely made when permitting large deformations when compared to the traditional UHB prevention approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/32279-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/32279-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其非线性弯曲响应、低弯曲刚度和潜在的高轴向膨胀系数,埋地无粘结柔性管容易发生剧变屈曲(UHB)。传统的工业方法是通过提供足够的下载来防止UHB,以限制管道向上移动到非常小的水平(通常在土壤的动员距离内)。由于未粘结的柔性管道几乎不具有弯曲性,因此防止未粘结柔性管道UHB所需的下载可能非常大,从而导致禁止排石要求。然而,通过设计,无粘结柔性管可以适应大的弯曲变形,而不会影响管道的横截面完整性。本文的目的是提出一种利用管道能力来适应大变形和最小化下载要求的方法。本文提出了一个全面的文献综述的最先进的方法,目前采用的工业评估埋地无粘结柔性管道的UHB。另一种方法,允许显著的向上运动的柔性管道,利用管道的能力,以适应这样的运动,也提出了。研究了与这些方法相关的潜在失效模式、机制和后果的比较,并提出了接受标准。进行了参数化有限元分析研究,以比较使用传统方法和提出的替代方法的柔性管道行为和下载要求。本文提出的案例研究表明,与传统的UHB预防方法相比,在允许大变形的情况下,可以安全地节省排石量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upheaval Buckling of Unbonded Flexible Pipes: An Alternative Approach
Due to their non-linear bending response, low bending stiffness and potentially high axial expansion coefficients, buried unbonded flexible pipes can be susceptible to Upheaval Buckling (UHB). The traditional industry approach is to prevent UHB by providing sufficient download to limit upwards movement of the pipe to very small levels (normally within the mobilisation distance of the soil). Since unbonded flexible pipes offer little resistance to bending, the required download to prevent UHB of unbonded flexible pipes can be significant resulting in prohibitive rock-dump requirements. However, by design, unbonded flexible pipes can accommodate large bending deformations without compromising the cross-sectional integrity of the pipe. The objective of this paper is to propose an approach which takes advantage of the pipes capability to accommodate large deformations and to minimize download requirements. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of the state-of-the-art methods currently adopted in industry for the assessment of UHB of buried unbonded flexible pipelines. An alternative approach which permits significant upwards movement of the flexible pipe, taking advantage of the pipes ability to accommodate such movements, is also presented. A comparison of the potential failure modes, mechanisms and consequences associated with these approaches are studied and acceptance criteria are proposed. Parametric finite element analysis studies are performed to compare the flexible pipe behaviour and download requirements using the traditional approach and the proposed alternative approach. This paper presents case studies which demonstrate that significant savings in the volume of rock-dump can be safely made when permitting large deformations when compared to the traditional UHB prevention approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信