在著名的学术和科学期刊上发表文章:被接受的关键标准

Palto Datta, Mark T. Jones
{"title":"在著名的学术和科学期刊上发表文章:被接受的关键标准","authors":"Palto Datta, Mark T. Jones","doi":"10.24052/ijhem/v05n01/art05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In scholarly journal publication, blind peer review has become an integral part of the process that helps maintain the standard and quality of academic papers that are accepted for publication. The main purpose of this study was to understand the reasons for the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript by analysing the reviewers’ comments based on the ratings on eight specific areas of concern and their written comments.","PeriodicalId":148689,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Higher Education Management","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Being published in reputable academic and scientific journals: Key criteria for acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Palto Datta, Mark T. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.24052/ijhem/v05n01/art05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: In scholarly journal publication, blind peer review has become an integral part of the process that helps maintain the standard and quality of academic papers that are accepted for publication. The main purpose of this study was to understand the reasons for the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript by analysing the reviewers’ comments based on the ratings on eight specific areas of concern and their written comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Higher Education Management\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Higher Education Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24052/ijhem/v05n01/art05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Higher Education Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/ijhem/v05n01/art05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在学术期刊出版中,盲目同行评议已经成为维持被接受发表的学术论文的标准和质量的过程中不可或缺的一部分。本研究的主要目的是通过分析审稿人对八个具体关注领域的评分和他们的书面评论,来了解稿件被接受或被拒绝的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Being published in reputable academic and scientific journals: Key criteria for acceptance
Purpose: In scholarly journal publication, blind peer review has become an integral part of the process that helps maintain the standard and quality of academic papers that are accepted for publication. The main purpose of this study was to understand the reasons for the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript by analysing the reviewers’ comments based on the ratings on eight specific areas of concern and their written comments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信