{"title":"摩洛哥Gharb地区甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)的最短无草期","authors":"Bennasseur S. Alaoui, D. Wyse, A. Dexter","doi":"10.5274/JSBR.40.4.251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research was to determine the minimum period during which fall-seeded sugarbeet should b e kept weed-free in the Gharb region of Morocco to limit root and extractable sucrose yield loss, and to determine the persistence of weed control with preemergence (PRE) or postemergence (POST) herbicides. Continuous post-planting hand-weeding for 17 weeks and 15 weeks in 1990, and for 15 weeks and 12.5 weeks in 1991 were required to limit sugarbeet root yield loss to 5% and 10%, respectively. Sucrose content did not vary with increasing weed-free duration. Weed dry weight produced during the growing season and the reduction of cumulative leaf area duration explained most of the reduction in sugarbeet root yields. High cumulative leafarea duration was the result of high leaf area expansion rate. PRE herbicides gave poor weed control and resulted in 100% and 85% sugarbeet yield loss in 1990 and 1991, respectively. The combination of P RE and POST herbicides improved weed control, but yield loss was still significant ; 34% in 1990 and 48% in 1991. Nomenclature: Pyrazon, 5-amino-4-chloro-2 phenyl-3(2H )-pyridazinone; Ethofumesate, «±)-2 eth oxy-2,3-dih ydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate); Fluazifop, (R)-2-[ 4-[[5-( trifluoro meth y 1)-2-pyrid inyl]oxy]ph enoxy] propanoic acid; Lena cil, (3-cyclohexyl-6,7-dihydro-l H-cyclopenta pyrimidine-2,4(3H, 5H )-dione; Phenmedipham, 3","PeriodicalId":403165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum weed-free period for sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the Gharb region of Morocco\",\"authors\":\"Bennasseur S. Alaoui, D. Wyse, A. Dexter\",\"doi\":\"10.5274/JSBR.40.4.251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research was to determine the minimum period during which fall-seeded sugarbeet should b e kept weed-free in the Gharb region of Morocco to limit root and extractable sucrose yield loss, and to determine the persistence of weed control with preemergence (PRE) or postemergence (POST) herbicides. Continuous post-planting hand-weeding for 17 weeks and 15 weeks in 1990, and for 15 weeks and 12.5 weeks in 1991 were required to limit sugarbeet root yield loss to 5% and 10%, respectively. Sucrose content did not vary with increasing weed-free duration. Weed dry weight produced during the growing season and the reduction of cumulative leaf area duration explained most of the reduction in sugarbeet root yields. High cumulative leafarea duration was the result of high leaf area expansion rate. PRE herbicides gave poor weed control and resulted in 100% and 85% sugarbeet yield loss in 1990 and 1991, respectively. The combination of P RE and POST herbicides improved weed control, but yield loss was still significant ; 34% in 1990 and 48% in 1991. Nomenclature: Pyrazon, 5-amino-4-chloro-2 phenyl-3(2H )-pyridazinone; Ethofumesate, «±)-2 eth oxy-2,3-dih ydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate); Fluazifop, (R)-2-[ 4-[[5-( trifluoro meth y 1)-2-pyrid inyl]oxy]ph enoxy] propanoic acid; Lena cil, (3-cyclohexyl-6,7-dihydro-l H-cyclopenta pyrimidine-2,4(3H, 5H )-dione; Phenmedipham, 3\",\"PeriodicalId\":403165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sugarbeet Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.40.4.251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sugarbeet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5274/JSBR.40.4.251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本研究的目的是确定摩洛哥Gharb地区落籽甜菜应保持无杂草的最短时间,以限制根和可提取蔗糖产量损失,并确定出苗期前(PRE)或出苗期后(POST)除草剂控制杂草的持久性。1990年种植后连续手工除草17周和15周,1991年连续手工除草15周和12.5周,分别将甜菜根产量损失限制在5%和10%。蔗糖含量不随除草时间的延长而变化。在生长季节产生的杂草干重和累积叶面积持续时间的减少是甜菜根产量减少的主要原因。高累积叶面积持续时间是高叶面积扩张率的结果。PRE除草剂对杂草的控制效果较差,分别导致1990年和1991年甜菜产量损失100%和85%。P、RE、POST两种除草剂联用对杂草控制效果较好,但产量损失仍显著;1990年是34%,1991年是48%。名称:5-氨基-4-氯-2 -苯基-3(2H)-吡嗪酮;乙氧乙酯(±)-2 -乙氧-2,3-二氢-3,3-二甲基-5-苯并呋喃基甲烷磺酸盐);(R)-2-[4-[[5-(三氟-甲基1)-2-吡啶基]氧]ph氧]丙酸;(3-环己基-6,7-二氢- 1 - h -环五-嘧啶-2,4(3H, 5H)-二酮;Phenmedipham, 3 -
Minimum weed-free period for sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the Gharb region of Morocco
The objective of this research was to determine the minimum period during which fall-seeded sugarbeet should b e kept weed-free in the Gharb region of Morocco to limit root and extractable sucrose yield loss, and to determine the persistence of weed control with preemergence (PRE) or postemergence (POST) herbicides. Continuous post-planting hand-weeding for 17 weeks and 15 weeks in 1990, and for 15 weeks and 12.5 weeks in 1991 were required to limit sugarbeet root yield loss to 5% and 10%, respectively. Sucrose content did not vary with increasing weed-free duration. Weed dry weight produced during the growing season and the reduction of cumulative leaf area duration explained most of the reduction in sugarbeet root yields. High cumulative leafarea duration was the result of high leaf area expansion rate. PRE herbicides gave poor weed control and resulted in 100% and 85% sugarbeet yield loss in 1990 and 1991, respectively. The combination of P RE and POST herbicides improved weed control, but yield loss was still significant ; 34% in 1990 and 48% in 1991. Nomenclature: Pyrazon, 5-amino-4-chloro-2 phenyl-3(2H )-pyridazinone; Ethofumesate, «±)-2 eth oxy-2,3-dih ydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonate); Fluazifop, (R)-2-[ 4-[[5-( trifluoro meth y 1)-2-pyrid inyl]oxy]ph enoxy] propanoic acid; Lena cil, (3-cyclohexyl-6,7-dihydro-l H-cyclopenta pyrimidine-2,4(3H, 5H )-dione; Phenmedipham, 3