当软件架构导致社会债务时

D. Tamburri, E. D. Nitto
{"title":"当软件架构导致社会债务时","authors":"D. Tamburri, E. D. Nitto","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2015.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social and technical debt both represent the state of software development organizations as a result of accumulated decisions. In the case of social debt, decisions (and connected debt) weigh on people and their socio-technical interactions/characteristics. Digging deeper into social debt with an industrial case-study, we found that software architecture, the prince of development artefacts, plays a major role in causing social debt. This paper discusses a key circumstance wherefore social debt is connected to software architectures and what can be done and measured in response, as observed in our case-study. Also, we introduce DAHLIA, that is \"Debt-Aimed Architecture-Level Incommunicability Analysis\" - a framework to elicit some of the causes behind social debt for further analysis.","PeriodicalId":414931,"journal":{"name":"2015 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Software Architecture Leads to Social Debt\",\"authors\":\"D. Tamburri, E. D. Nitto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICSA.2015.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social and technical debt both represent the state of software development organizations as a result of accumulated decisions. In the case of social debt, decisions (and connected debt) weigh on people and their socio-technical interactions/characteristics. Digging deeper into social debt with an industrial case-study, we found that software architecture, the prince of development artefacts, plays a major role in causing social debt. This paper discusses a key circumstance wherefore social debt is connected to software architectures and what can be done and measured in response, as observed in our case-study. Also, we introduce DAHLIA, that is \\\"Debt-Aimed Architecture-Level Incommunicability Analysis\\\" - a framework to elicit some of the causes behind social debt for further analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2015.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2015.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

社会债务和技术债务都代表了软件开发组织作为累积决策的结果的状态。在社会债务的情况下,决策(和相关债务)对人和他们的社会技术互动/特征有影响。通过一个工业案例研究深入挖掘社会债务,我们发现软件架构,开发工件的王子,在造成社会债务方面起着主要作用。本文讨论了社会债务与软件架构相关的一个关键情况,以及在我们的案例研究中所观察到的响应中可以做什么和测量什么。此外,我们还介绍了DAHLIA,即“以债务为目标的架构级不可通用性分析”——这是一个框架,用于引出社会债务背后的一些原因,以便进一步分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Software Architecture Leads to Social Debt
Social and technical debt both represent the state of software development organizations as a result of accumulated decisions. In the case of social debt, decisions (and connected debt) weigh on people and their socio-technical interactions/characteristics. Digging deeper into social debt with an industrial case-study, we found that software architecture, the prince of development artefacts, plays a major role in causing social debt. This paper discusses a key circumstance wherefore social debt is connected to software architectures and what can be done and measured in response, as observed in our case-study. Also, we introduce DAHLIA, that is "Debt-Aimed Architecture-Level Incommunicability Analysis" - a framework to elicit some of the causes behind social debt for further analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信