{"title":"比较回归测试策略的成本模型","authors":"H. Leung, L. White","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.1991.160330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A software test cost model which can be used to compare the retest-all strategy to a selective strategy is proposed. A test cost model is presented, and the conditions under which the selective strategy is more economical than the retest-all strategy are identified. Recently introduced regression testing strategies are reviewed. It is found that the relative cost depends on four factors: the selection, the execution, the checking cost, and the ratio of the size of the selected previous test to the size of the total previous test.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":269572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1991","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"176","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cost model to compare regression test strategies\",\"authors\":\"H. Leung, L. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.1991.160330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A software test cost model which can be used to compare the retest-all strategy to a selective strategy is proposed. A test cost model is presented, and the conditions under which the selective strategy is more economical than the retest-all strategy are identified. Recently introduced regression testing strategies are reviewed. It is found that the relative cost depends on four factors: the selection, the execution, the checking cost, and the ratio of the size of the selected previous test to the size of the total previous test.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":269572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1991\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"176\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1991\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1991.160330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Conference on Software Maintenance 1991","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1991.160330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A cost model to compare regression test strategies
A software test cost model which can be used to compare the retest-all strategy to a selective strategy is proposed. A test cost model is presented, and the conditions under which the selective strategy is more economical than the retest-all strategy are identified. Recently introduced regression testing strategies are reviewed. It is found that the relative cost depends on four factors: the selection, the execution, the checking cost, and the ratio of the size of the selected previous test to the size of the total previous test.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
