冷战可信性

R. Kuo
{"title":"冷战可信性","authors":"R. Kuo","doi":"10.11126/stanford/9781503628434.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The second case highlights how Middle East and Southeast Asian countries pushed the United States to create NATO-like security institutions in their regions early in the Cold War. These countries evaluated American reliability based on alliance emulation: only strategies matching NATO’s design signaled commitment. Washington’s refusal to adopt the Atlantic Alliance’s strategy in other alliances undermined efforts to demonstrate resolve and consolidate power against the Soviet Union.","PeriodicalId":166648,"journal":{"name":"Following the Leader","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cold War Credibility\",\"authors\":\"R. Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.11126/stanford/9781503628434.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The second case highlights how Middle East and Southeast Asian countries pushed the United States to create NATO-like security institutions in their regions early in the Cold War. These countries evaluated American reliability based on alliance emulation: only strategies matching NATO’s design signaled commitment. Washington’s refusal to adopt the Atlantic Alliance’s strategy in other alliances undermined efforts to demonstrate resolve and consolidate power against the Soviet Union.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Following the Leader\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Following the Leader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503628434.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Following the Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503628434.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二个案例凸显了中东和东南亚国家在冷战初期如何推动美国在他们的地区建立类似北约的安全机构。这些国家基于联盟模拟来评估美国的可靠性:只有与北约设计相匹配的战略才表明承诺。华盛顿拒绝在其他联盟中采用大西洋联盟的战略,破坏了展示对抗苏联的决心和巩固实力的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cold War Credibility
The second case highlights how Middle East and Southeast Asian countries pushed the United States to create NATO-like security institutions in their regions early in the Cold War. These countries evaluated American reliability based on alliance emulation: only strategies matching NATO’s design signaled commitment. Washington’s refusal to adopt the Atlantic Alliance’s strategy in other alliances undermined efforts to demonstrate resolve and consolidate power against the Soviet Union.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信