{"title":"一项研究“土泊散”在慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者综合治疗中的有效性的比较对照试验的结果。","authors":"A. Smernitsky, S. Krasnyak","doi":"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-116-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The high frequency of recurrence of chronic bacterial prostatitis may be due to the weakening of local and systemic immunity. This determines the need for immunotropic therapy in this disease. Target. To evaluate the effectiveness of «Tubosan» in the complex therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Materials and methods. A comparative controlled cohort study was conducted. The study included 60 men with a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis of chronic bacterial prostatitis. The main group received antibiotic therapy in combination with «Tubosan». Control - only antibiotic therapy. The duration of treatment in both groups was 28 days. All patients underwent an IPSS questionnaire, microscopy, and culture of prostate secretion. Results and discussion. All patients of both groups showed complete eradication of pathogens according to the results of seeding of the secret of the prostate gland. In patients of the main group, a more pronounced decrease in symptoms was observed compared with the control. The sum of points on the IPSS scale before and after treatment in the main group was 21,9±1.3 vs 8.7±2.2, in the control group - 22.2±10.3 vs 10.3±1.4 points, respectively ( p<0.001). In the main group, there was a more significant decrease in the inflammatory process in the prostate. The average number of leukocytes in the field of view in the main group before and after treatment was 101.0±23.2 vs 5.2±1.3 cells (p<0.001), in the control group 101.6±21.5 vs 16.8±6.2 cells (p<0.001), respectively. After treatment, both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in the quality of life of patients, as assessed by the answer to question 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. In the main group, the average score on question No. 7 before and after treatment was 3.9±0.6 vs 1.8±0.5 points, respectively (p<0.001) 3.9±0.6 points vs 2.3±0.4 points, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion. «Tubosan» can be used as an immunotropic agent in the complex therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis to improve treatment outcomes","PeriodicalId":123040,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of a сomparative controlled trial to study the effectiveness of «Tubosan» in the complex therapy of patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis.\",\"authors\":\"A. Smernitsky, S. Krasnyak\",\"doi\":\"10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-116-122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The high frequency of recurrence of chronic bacterial prostatitis may be due to the weakening of local and systemic immunity. This determines the need for immunotropic therapy in this disease. Target. To evaluate the effectiveness of «Tubosan» in the complex therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Materials and methods. A comparative controlled cohort study was conducted. The study included 60 men with a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis of chronic bacterial prostatitis. The main group received antibiotic therapy in combination with «Tubosan». Control - only antibiotic therapy. The duration of treatment in both groups was 28 days. All patients underwent an IPSS questionnaire, microscopy, and culture of prostate secretion. Results and discussion. All patients of both groups showed complete eradication of pathogens according to the results of seeding of the secret of the prostate gland. In patients of the main group, a more pronounced decrease in symptoms was observed compared with the control. The sum of points on the IPSS scale before and after treatment in the main group was 21,9±1.3 vs 8.7±2.2, in the control group - 22.2±10.3 vs 10.3±1.4 points, respectively ( p<0.001). In the main group, there was a more significant decrease in the inflammatory process in the prostate. The average number of leukocytes in the field of view in the main group before and after treatment was 101.0±23.2 vs 5.2±1.3 cells (p<0.001), in the control group 101.6±21.5 vs 16.8±6.2 cells (p<0.001), respectively. After treatment, both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in the quality of life of patients, as assessed by the answer to question 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. In the main group, the average score on question No. 7 before and after treatment was 3.9±0.6 vs 1.8±0.5 points, respectively (p<0.001) 3.9±0.6 points vs 2.3±0.4 points, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion. «Tubosan» can be used as an immunotropic agent in the complex therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis to improve treatment outcomes\",\"PeriodicalId\":123040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and Сlinical Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-116-122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Сlinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2022-15-3-116-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
介绍。慢性细菌性前列腺炎复发率高,可能与局部及全身免疫功能减弱有关。这决定了这种疾病需要免疫治疗。目标。目的:评价土泊散在慢性细菌性前列腺炎综合治疗中的疗效。材料和方法。进行了一项比较对照队列研究。该研究包括60名经微生物学诊断为慢性细菌性前列腺炎的男性。主要组接受抗生素治疗联合«Tubosan»。对照组仅使用抗生素治疗。两组治疗时间均为28 d。所有患者均接受了IPSS问卷、显微镜检查和前列腺分泌物培养。结果和讨论。两组患者均显示前列腺秘密播种的结果,病原体完全根除。在主组患者中,与对照组相比,观察到症状的明显减轻。主组治疗前后IPSS积分和分别为21.9±1.3分vs 8.7±2.2分,对照组治疗前后分别为22.2±10.3分vs 10.3±1.4分(p<0.001)。在主组中,前列腺的炎症过程有更显著的减少。治疗前后,主组视野内平均白细胞数分别为101.0±23.2 vs 5.2±1.3 (p<0.001),对照组为101.6±21.5 vs 16.8±6.2 (p<0.001)。治疗后,两组患者的生活质量均有统计学显著改善,通过IPSS问卷问题7的答案进行评估。主组治疗前后第7题平均得分分别为3.9±0.6分vs 1.8±0.5分(p<0.001) 3.9±0.6分vs 2.3±0.4分(p<0.001)。结论。Tubosan可以作为一种免疫增强剂用于慢性细菌性前列腺炎的综合治疗,以改善治疗效果
Results of a сomparative controlled trial to study the effectiveness of «Tubosan» in the complex therapy of patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis.
Introduction. The high frequency of recurrence of chronic bacterial prostatitis may be due to the weakening of local and systemic immunity. This determines the need for immunotropic therapy in this disease. Target. To evaluate the effectiveness of «Tubosan» in the complex therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Materials and methods. A comparative controlled cohort study was conducted. The study included 60 men with a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis of chronic bacterial prostatitis. The main group received antibiotic therapy in combination with «Tubosan». Control - only antibiotic therapy. The duration of treatment in both groups was 28 days. All patients underwent an IPSS questionnaire, microscopy, and culture of prostate secretion. Results and discussion. All patients of both groups showed complete eradication of pathogens according to the results of seeding of the secret of the prostate gland. In patients of the main group, a more pronounced decrease in symptoms was observed compared with the control. The sum of points on the IPSS scale before and after treatment in the main group was 21,9±1.3 vs 8.7±2.2, in the control group - 22.2±10.3 vs 10.3±1.4 points, respectively ( p<0.001). In the main group, there was a more significant decrease in the inflammatory process in the prostate. The average number of leukocytes in the field of view in the main group before and after treatment was 101.0±23.2 vs 5.2±1.3 cells (p<0.001), in the control group 101.6±21.5 vs 16.8±6.2 cells (p<0.001), respectively. After treatment, both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in the quality of life of patients, as assessed by the answer to question 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. In the main group, the average score on question No. 7 before and after treatment was 3.9±0.6 vs 1.8±0.5 points, respectively (p<0.001) 3.9±0.6 points vs 2.3±0.4 points, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion. «Tubosan» can be used as an immunotropic agent in the complex therapy of chronic bacterial prostatitis to improve treatment outcomes