学生对参与数据库领域和结构的看法

Daphne Miedema, Toni Taipalus, Efthimia Aivaloglou
{"title":"学生对参与数据库领域和结构的看法","authors":"Daphne Miedema, Toni Taipalus, Efthimia Aivaloglou","doi":"10.1145/3545945.3569727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several educational studies have argued for the contextualization of assignments, i.e., for providing a context or a story instead of an abstract or symbolic problem statement. Such contextualization may have beneficial effects such as higher student engagement and lower dropout rates. In the domain of database education, textbooks and educators typically provide an example database for context. These are then used to introduce key concepts related to database design, and to illustrate querying. However, it remains unstudied what kinds of database contexts are engaging for novices. In this paper, we study which aspects of database domain and complexity students find engaging through student reflections on a database creation assignment. We identify six factors regarding engaging domains, and five factors for engaging complexity. The main factor for domain-related engagement was Personal interest, the main factor for complexity engagement was Matching information requirements. Our findings can help database educators and book authors to design engaging exercise databases targeted for novices.","PeriodicalId":371326,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students' Perceptions on Engaging Database Domains and Structures\",\"authors\":\"Daphne Miedema, Toni Taipalus, Efthimia Aivaloglou\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3545945.3569727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several educational studies have argued for the contextualization of assignments, i.e., for providing a context or a story instead of an abstract or symbolic problem statement. Such contextualization may have beneficial effects such as higher student engagement and lower dropout rates. In the domain of database education, textbooks and educators typically provide an example database for context. These are then used to introduce key concepts related to database design, and to illustrate querying. However, it remains unstudied what kinds of database contexts are engaging for novices. In this paper, we study which aspects of database domain and complexity students find engaging through student reflections on a database creation assignment. We identify six factors regarding engaging domains, and five factors for engaging complexity. The main factor for domain-related engagement was Personal interest, the main factor for complexity engagement was Matching information requirements. Our findings can help database educators and book authors to design engaging exercise databases targeted for novices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一些教育研究支持作业的情境化,即提供一个背景或故事,而不是抽象或象征性的问题陈述。这种情境化可能会产生有益的影响,比如提高学生的参与度和降低辍学率。在数据库教育领域,教科书和教育工作者通常会为上下文提供一个示例数据库。然后使用这些概念介绍与数据库设计相关的关键概念,并说明查询。然而,对于新手来说,什么类型的数据库上下文更有吸引力还没有研究。在本文中,我们通过学生对数据库创建作业的反思来研究学生对数据库领域和复杂性的哪些方面感兴趣。我们确定了涉及领域的六个因素,以及涉及复杂性的五个因素。领域相关参与的主要因素是个人兴趣,复杂性参与的主要因素是匹配信息需求。我们的发现可以帮助数据库教育者和书籍作者设计针对新手的有吸引力的练习数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students' Perceptions on Engaging Database Domains and Structures
Several educational studies have argued for the contextualization of assignments, i.e., for providing a context or a story instead of an abstract or symbolic problem statement. Such contextualization may have beneficial effects such as higher student engagement and lower dropout rates. In the domain of database education, textbooks and educators typically provide an example database for context. These are then used to introduce key concepts related to database design, and to illustrate querying. However, it remains unstudied what kinds of database contexts are engaging for novices. In this paper, we study which aspects of database domain and complexity students find engaging through student reflections on a database creation assignment. We identify six factors regarding engaging domains, and five factors for engaging complexity. The main factor for domain-related engagement was Personal interest, the main factor for complexity engagement was Matching information requirements. Our findings can help database educators and book authors to design engaging exercise databases targeted for novices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信