从程序到复杂的理性关系:被观察系统与被观察系统

A. Isla
{"title":"从程序到复杂的理性关系:被观察系统与被观察系统","authors":"A. Isla","doi":"10.1051/EJESS:2000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Procedural rationality and substantive rationality call for two different approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. While in the first case, the question of interest is \"what is it made of?\" The appropriate methodology is analytic and the epistemology, positivist. In the second case, the question will be \"what does it make, and why?\" the methodology complex and the epistemology, constructivist. The object of study will be different in both cases. The choice of a methodology also reflects a different view of uncertainty. As a consequence, it is impossible to use simultaneously the two rationality concepts and to study the behavior of an economic agent. How can we then classify the economical theories according to either one of the rationality concept and reasoning approach (complex or analytic)? The Economics of Convention School, developed in France, offers a conceptual framework consistent with a complex approach. It still has to adhere to that complex approach in a more total way, by assuming the economist observer's projects and aims.","PeriodicalId":352454,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From procedural to complex rationality relations: Observed system and observing system\",\"authors\":\"A. Isla\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/EJESS:2000102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Procedural rationality and substantive rationality call for two different approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. While in the first case, the question of interest is \\\"what is it made of?\\\" The appropriate methodology is analytic and the epistemology, positivist. In the second case, the question will be \\\"what does it make, and why?\\\" the methodology complex and the epistemology, constructivist. The object of study will be different in both cases. The choice of a methodology also reflects a different view of uncertainty. As a consequence, it is impossible to use simultaneously the two rationality concepts and to study the behavior of an economic agent. How can we then classify the economical theories according to either one of the rationality concept and reasoning approach (complex or analytic)? The Economics of Convention School, developed in France, offers a conceptual framework consistent with a complex approach. It still has to adhere to that complex approach in a more total way, by assuming the economist observer's projects and aims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2000102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/EJESS:2000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

程序理性与实体理性在方法论和认识论上要求两种不同的途径。而在第一种情况下,感兴趣的问题是“它是由什么制成的?”恰当的方法论是分析的,认识论是实证的。在第二种情况下,问题将是"它制造了什么,为什么?"方法论复杂,认识论,建构主义。在这两种情况下,研究的对象是不同的。方法论的选择也反映了对不确定性的不同看法。因此,不可能同时使用这两个理性概念来研究经济主体的行为。那么,我们如何根据理性概念和推理方法(复杂或分析)中的任何一种对经济理论进行分类呢?法国的惯例经济学派提供了一个与复杂方法相一致的概念框架。它仍然必须以一种更全面的方式坚持这种复杂的方法,通过假设《经济学人观察》的项目和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From procedural to complex rationality relations: Observed system and observing system
Procedural rationality and substantive rationality call for two different approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. While in the first case, the question of interest is "what is it made of?" The appropriate methodology is analytic and the epistemology, positivist. In the second case, the question will be "what does it make, and why?" the methodology complex and the epistemology, constructivist. The object of study will be different in both cases. The choice of a methodology also reflects a different view of uncertainty. As a consequence, it is impossible to use simultaneously the two rationality concepts and to study the behavior of an economic agent. How can we then classify the economical theories according to either one of the rationality concept and reasoning approach (complex or analytic)? The Economics of Convention School, developed in France, offers a conceptual framework consistent with a complex approach. It still has to adhere to that complex approach in a more total way, by assuming the economist observer's projects and aims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信