物联网智能篮子的发展:边缘计算与云计算系统的性能比较

Nandiwardhana Waranugraha, M. Suryanegara
{"title":"物联网智能篮子的发展:边缘计算与云计算系统的性能比较","authors":"Nandiwardhana Waranugraha, M. Suryanegara","doi":"10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to develop the Internet-of Things (IoT) Smart-Basket, working on 2 different systems, i.e. Edge Computing and Cloud Computing. To identify the best system, we compare the performance between “Edge Computing” system and “Cloud Computing” system. The system consists of Raspberry Pi hardware and webcam. Python, TFLite, OpenCV, and Google Cloud Vision API software to detect shopping objects. The object detection results are calculated and sent to end-users through the Telegram application. Discussions are presented concerning the Time Performance and RSSI Value between two systems. The results show “Edge Computing” systems have a more stable system with an average processing time of 1.74 sec on Line-of-Sight (LOS) condition and 1.75 sec on Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) condition compared to “Cloud Computing” systems with an average processing time of 10.46 sec on LOS condition and 5.36 sec on NLOS condition.","PeriodicalId":211983,"journal":{"name":"2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of IoT-Smart Basket: Performance Comparison between Edge Computing and Cloud Computing System\",\"authors\":\"Nandiwardhana Waranugraha, M. Suryanegara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to develop the Internet-of Things (IoT) Smart-Basket, working on 2 different systems, i.e. Edge Computing and Cloud Computing. To identify the best system, we compare the performance between “Edge Computing” system and “Cloud Computing” system. The system consists of Raspberry Pi hardware and webcam. Python, TFLite, OpenCV, and Google Cloud Vision API software to detect shopping objects. The object detection results are calculated and sent to end-users through the Telegram application. Discussions are presented concerning the Time Performance and RSSI Value between two systems. The results show “Edge Computing” systems have a more stable system with an average processing time of 1.74 sec on Line-of-Sight (LOS) condition and 1.75 sec on Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) condition compared to “Cloud Computing” systems with an average processing time of 10.46 sec on LOS condition and 5.36 sec on NLOS condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文旨在开发物联网(IoT)智能篮,工作在两个不同的系统上,即边缘计算和云计算。为了确定最佳系统,我们比较了“边缘计算”系统和“云计算”系统的性能。系统由树莓派硬件和网络摄像头组成。Python, TFLite, OpenCV,和谷歌云视觉API软件来检测购物对象。计算对象检测结果并通过Telegram应用程序发送给最终用户。讨论了两个系统之间的时间性能和RSSI值。结果表明,“边缘计算”系统在视距条件下的平均处理时间为1.74秒,在非视距条件下的平均处理时间为1.75秒,而“云计算”系统在视距条件下的平均处理时间为10.46秒,在非视距条件下的平均处理时间为5.36秒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Development of IoT-Smart Basket: Performance Comparison between Edge Computing and Cloud Computing System
This paper aims to develop the Internet-of Things (IoT) Smart-Basket, working on 2 different systems, i.e. Edge Computing and Cloud Computing. To identify the best system, we compare the performance between “Edge Computing” system and “Cloud Computing” system. The system consists of Raspberry Pi hardware and webcam. Python, TFLite, OpenCV, and Google Cloud Vision API software to detect shopping objects. The object detection results are calculated and sent to end-users through the Telegram application. Discussions are presented concerning the Time Performance and RSSI Value between two systems. The results show “Edge Computing” systems have a more stable system with an average processing time of 1.74 sec on Line-of-Sight (LOS) condition and 1.75 sec on Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) condition compared to “Cloud Computing” systems with an average processing time of 10.46 sec on LOS condition and 5.36 sec on NLOS condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信