回溯期市场分析的特殊性在解决反垄断立法预防问题中的作用

D. V. Sidorov
{"title":"回溯期市场分析的特殊性在解决反垄断立法预防问题中的作用","authors":"D. V. Sidorov","doi":"10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-30-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author analyzes the provisions of the Procedure for analyzing the state of competition in the commodity market, approved by order of the FAS of Russia dated 28.04.2010 No. 220, and comes to the conclusion that, that in accordance with the Procedure for Market Analysis Methods in retrospective and prospective periods do not differ from each other, despite the fact that the market in the retrospective period is characterized by actual indicators, and the market indicators of the prospective period should include forecast elements. In essence, these are different markets with different structures and prices. Failure to take into account the specifics of these markets, in particular, the requirement of the Procedure on the application of the hypothetical monopolist test in the analysis of the retrospective period market, leads to a decrease in the level of validity of the analysis and does not meet the requirement of irrefutability, arising from the rule of Part 4 of Art. 45.1 of the Law on Protection of Competition, according to which the results of the analysis of the state of competition conducted in order, established by the federal antimonopoly authority, refer to written evidence in the case.The author concludes that it is necessary to make changes and additions to the Procedure that reflect the specifics of market analysis in the retrospective period.","PeriodicalId":250547,"journal":{"name":"Russian competition law and economy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peculiarities of Market Analysis in the Retrospective Period in Solving the Problem of Preventing Violations of Antimonopoly Legislation\",\"authors\":\"D. V. Sidorov\",\"doi\":\"10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-30-37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author analyzes the provisions of the Procedure for analyzing the state of competition in the commodity market, approved by order of the FAS of Russia dated 28.04.2010 No. 220, and comes to the conclusion that, that in accordance with the Procedure for Market Analysis Methods in retrospective and prospective periods do not differ from each other, despite the fact that the market in the retrospective period is characterized by actual indicators, and the market indicators of the prospective period should include forecast elements. In essence, these are different markets with different structures and prices. Failure to take into account the specifics of these markets, in particular, the requirement of the Procedure on the application of the hypothetical monopolist test in the analysis of the retrospective period market, leads to a decrease in the level of validity of the analysis and does not meet the requirement of irrefutability, arising from the rule of Part 4 of Art. 45.1 of the Law on Protection of Competition, according to which the results of the analysis of the state of competition conducted in order, established by the federal antimonopoly authority, refer to written evidence in the case.The author concludes that it is necessary to make changes and additions to the Procedure that reflect the specifics of market analysis in the retrospective period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian competition law and economy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian competition law and economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-30-37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian competition law and economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-3-31-30-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对2010年4月28日俄罗斯联邦调查局第220号命令批准的《商品市场竞争状况分析程序》的规定进行了分析,得出结论:根据《市场分析方法程序》,尽管回顾期的市场具有实际指标的特点,但回顾期和预期期的市场分析方法并没有区别。预期期的市场指标应包含预测要素。从本质上讲,这些是不同的市场,具有不同的结构和价格。未考虑到这些市场的具体情况,特别是《程序》关于在追溯期市场分析中适用假设垄断者测试的要求,导致分析有效性水平下降,不符合《竞争保护法》第45.1条第4部分规定的不可辩驳性要求。据此,联邦反垄断机构所建立的有序的竞争状况分析结果参考了本案中的书面证据。作者认为,有必要对程序进行修改和补充,以反映回顾性市场分析的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peculiarities of Market Analysis in the Retrospective Period in Solving the Problem of Preventing Violations of Antimonopoly Legislation
The author analyzes the provisions of the Procedure for analyzing the state of competition in the commodity market, approved by order of the FAS of Russia dated 28.04.2010 No. 220, and comes to the conclusion that, that in accordance with the Procedure for Market Analysis Methods in retrospective and prospective periods do not differ from each other, despite the fact that the market in the retrospective period is characterized by actual indicators, and the market indicators of the prospective period should include forecast elements. In essence, these are different markets with different structures and prices. Failure to take into account the specifics of these markets, in particular, the requirement of the Procedure on the application of the hypothetical monopolist test in the analysis of the retrospective period market, leads to a decrease in the level of validity of the analysis and does not meet the requirement of irrefutability, arising from the rule of Part 4 of Art. 45.1 of the Law on Protection of Competition, according to which the results of the analysis of the state of competition conducted in order, established by the federal antimonopoly authority, refer to written evidence in the case.The author concludes that it is necessary to make changes and additions to the Procedure that reflect the specifics of market analysis in the retrospective period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信