潮流计算的准牛顿方法

A. Sangadiev, Andrey Poddubny, David Pozo, A. Gonzalez-Castellanos
{"title":"潮流计算的准牛顿方法","authors":"A. Sangadiev, Andrey Poddubny, David Pozo, A. Gonzalez-Castellanos","doi":"10.1109/REEPE49198.2020.9059230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we compared the performance of the ordinary Newton-Raphson method for calculating power flows against three quasi-Newton methods: chord, “good” and “bad” Broyden's methods. First, we illustrated compared the performance of each method on systems of equations of different sizes. Secondly, we compared these methods on power flow calculation for grids of different sizes. We found that an ill-suited initial approximation strongly affects the quasi-Newton methods and makes them slower than the Newton-Raphson one. Finally, in order to fix this issue, we introduced a mixed-method: a few iterations of Newton-Raphson are used to determine a more accurate initial approximation, which can then be used in quasi-Newton methods. Numerical tests showed that this approach outperforms ordinal Newton-Raphson and quasi-Newton methods.","PeriodicalId":142369,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quasi-Newton Methods for Power Flow Calculation\",\"authors\":\"A. Sangadiev, Andrey Poddubny, David Pozo, A. Gonzalez-Castellanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REEPE49198.2020.9059230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we compared the performance of the ordinary Newton-Raphson method for calculating power flows against three quasi-Newton methods: chord, “good” and “bad” Broyden's methods. First, we illustrated compared the performance of each method on systems of equations of different sizes. Secondly, we compared these methods on power flow calculation for grids of different sizes. We found that an ill-suited initial approximation strongly affects the quasi-Newton methods and makes them slower than the Newton-Raphson one. Finally, in order to fix this issue, we introduced a mixed-method: a few iterations of Newton-Raphson are used to determine a more accurate initial approximation, which can then be used in quasi-Newton methods. Numerical tests showed that this approach outperforms ordinal Newton-Raphson and quasi-Newton methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE49198.2020.9059230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE49198.2020.9059230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在这项工作中,我们比较了计算功率流的普通牛顿-拉夫森方法与三种准牛顿方法的性能:和弦,“好”和“坏”布洛登方法。首先,我们举例比较了每种方法在不同大小的方程组上的性能。其次,对不同规模电网的潮流计算方法进行了比较。我们发现一个不合适的初始近似强烈地影响准牛顿方法,使它们比牛顿-拉夫森方法慢。最后,为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一种混合方法:使用Newton-Raphson的几次迭代来确定更精确的初始近似,然后可以将其用于准牛顿方法。数值试验表明,该方法优于有序牛顿-拉夫森方法和准牛顿方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quasi-Newton Methods for Power Flow Calculation
In this work, we compared the performance of the ordinary Newton-Raphson method for calculating power flows against three quasi-Newton methods: chord, “good” and “bad” Broyden's methods. First, we illustrated compared the performance of each method on systems of equations of different sizes. Secondly, we compared these methods on power flow calculation for grids of different sizes. We found that an ill-suited initial approximation strongly affects the quasi-Newton methods and makes them slower than the Newton-Raphson one. Finally, in order to fix this issue, we introduced a mixed-method: a few iterations of Newton-Raphson are used to determine a more accurate initial approximation, which can then be used in quasi-Newton methods. Numerical tests showed that this approach outperforms ordinal Newton-Raphson and quasi-Newton methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信